[TrebleRebel]

"The J-Lo letter was passed around to several people besides Bob Stevens, yet none of the others tested positive for exposure."

What you fail to add here is that nasal swabs are notoriously unreliable - the fact that others tested negative for nasal swabs is almost meaningless. A positive nasal swab is an indicator of exposure, but a negative does NOT mean there was no exposure.

Once again, you ignore the FACTS, and you present opinion as fact. You are forced to do this because your arguments are all political, and you don't consider ALL the FACTS.

[EdLake]

What you fail to add here is that nasal swabs are notoriously unreliable - the fact that others tested negative for nasal swabs is almost meaningless. A positive nasal swab is an indicator of exposure, but a negative does NOT mean there was no exposure.

I was just looking at the evidence. You are saying the evidence means nothing because it doesn't fit your theory.

You say you are looking at all the evidence but you ignore the fact that the third floor where the J-Lo letter was opened and examined has less contamination than both of the other floors in the building. How do you twist the facts to explain that?

Ed