[EdLake]

What you fail to add here is that nasal swabs are notoriously unreliable - the fact that others tested negative for nasal swabs is almost meaningless. A positive nasal swab is an indicator of exposure, but a negative does NOT mean there was no exposure.

I was just looking at the evidence. You are saying the evidence means nothing because it doesn't fit your theory.

You say you are looking at all the evidence but you ignore the fact that the third floor where the J-Lo letter was opened and examined has less contamination than both of the other floors in the building. How do you twist the facts to explain that?

Ed

[TrebleRebel]

"I was just looking at the evidence."

I've got news for you - that is not "evidence". Negative results are meaningless. You may call it "evidence" - it is not.

Once again you are manufaturing evidence to achieve a political goal.

You need to look at ALL the FACTS.

Negative nasal swabs do NOT indicate no exposure - FACT.

I realize it's difficult for you to grasp that.

[TrebleRebel]

Who's more credible? Come on Ed, you can say it. You're his number one fan, you can do it.

Just tell us you think Mesleson is more credible, given all the FACTS I have stated above.

[TrebleRebel]

I just read the kind letter Mesleson wrote to you a while back, he says:

"You should insist on official confirmation of any claims of additives before believing there are any in the Daschle/ Leahy material."

It seems since then that we HAVE had official confirmation of additives. I guess the matter is now closed.

The question is - why aren't you following Meselson's original advice? You got the official confirmation. Could it be that you just DON'T LIKE the official confirmation?