Skip to comments.
Work of the Hague tribunal in Racak case criticized
BERLINER ZEITUNG ^
| 2004-01-17
| Markus Bickel
Posted on 01/19/2004 11:27:35 AM PST by DTA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
To: Wraith
Wraith, you couldn't flame your way out of an oxygen tent if someone handed you an acetylene torch.
You've already proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that arguing the merits of a case is beyond your severely abbreviated abilities, which is forgivable.
What is damnable, however, is your appalling incompetence when it comes to issuing meaningful, cogent insults.
41
posted on
01/22/2004 10:11:50 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
Again I take your babble as a compliment by once again getting under your old leathery skin......
42
posted on
01/23/2004 2:55:24 PM PST
by
Wraith
To: Wraith
Zzz...
43
posted on
01/23/2004 2:57:59 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: wonders; getoffmylawn; Incorrigible; joan; DTA; Fusion
A very good observation Wonders. Its as if the scene would have served is purpose and no longer of any use. The leader of the OSCE? Justice by imagination or premeditated positioning on Walkers part.
44
posted on
01/23/2004 3:57:53 PM PST
by
Wraith
To: Hoplite
Who died at Racek? What are the names again? Post them please.
45
posted on
01/23/2004 8:47:05 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: Burkeman1
What for?
If you're too lazy to find them yourself, even when you know where to look, the possibility of your doing anything useful with the information once you have it isn't too good, is it.
46
posted on
01/24/2004 8:32:35 AM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite; Burkeman1
You can't post names that do not exist.
47
posted on
01/25/2004 9:52:21 PM PST
by
Destro
(Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
To: Destro
True.
But the names do exist, and what's more, you've been told where to find them - you're just playing stupid again.
(A daytime Emmy worthy performance, were it not for the fact that you're just being yourself).
48
posted on
01/25/2004 10:51:14 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite; Burkeman1; Destro; joan; DTA
There are names, but they are not easily found. You have to dig deep to find them, and there is good reason for that. Much of indictment does not make any sense.
According to witnesses of alleged massacre Yugoslav Government War Crimes in Racak
Source (HRW):
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/kosovo98/racak.shtml Ten households of the Beqa family live in the part of Racak called Upper Mahalla on the edge of the village. According to one member of the family, whose son and husband were both killed, at around 7:00 a.m. thirty members of the Beqa family tried to run toward the nearby forest when they heard the police. She told Human Rights Watch that more then forty policemen wearing blue uniforms and without masks began shooting at them from a distance of twenty meters from the top of the hill.
More then forty policemen armed with automatic weapons without masks began shooting at them from a distance of twenty meters, and result -- only 3 dead and 2 wounded!!! Incredible luck, I guess.
Second, only alleged victim old 22 years is SHABANI, Bajrush; note that he is not Beqa he is Shabani.
Source (indictment):
http://www.un.org/icty/indictment/english/mil-ii990524e.htm Also note, there is mention only of BEQIRI victims in the indictment, there are no Beqa on that list.
According to the indictment,
MEHMETI, Bajram Male
MEHMETI, Hanumshah Female
are victims. Allegedly they are villagers living in Racak, everybody should know them but there is no mention of age. Or any other data! No address, no ID, no description nothing, nada, zero! And they are not only ones. For 24 names!!!! out of 45 they are not able to tell age (at least approximately) for fellow villagers.
Take for example this:
HRW: Searching for Weapons and the Killing of Nazmi Ymeri (76)
indictment ZYMERI, Njazi Male (mo age)
HRW: Mufail Hajrizi
indictment - HAJRIZI, Myfail
But let us not dwell on such details - names and positive ID.
What really amazes me is Serb incompetence! Their policeman and soldiers are really bungling and inept!
HRW: Two or three policeman beat them with wooden sticks. One was kicking them in the face with his boots. The others were just watching. It was terrible. The men were screaming, and their heads were covered with blood. A policeman locked me in the cellar with the women, but I could hear screaming for the next half an hour.
They are beating people with wooden sticks for half an hour and they are still able to scream!! Amazing toughness. It is strange and gets stranger!
HRW: One bullet crossed through his pocket, and another one is still in his belt.
And so on, and so forth.
HRW: Some time around 1:00 p.m. the police led the twenty-three men out of Osmani's yard.
indictment - A group of approximately 25 men attempted to hide in a building, but were discovered by the Serb police.
HRW: His throat and half his face had been cut by a knife. On the top of his head was a wooden stick with some paper.
Or this
Journalists at the scene early on January 16 told Human Rights Watch that many of these twenty-three men also had signs of torture, such as missing finger nails.
According to so-called indictment.
In one such incident, on 15 January 1999, 45 unarmed Kosovo Albanians were murdered in the village of Racak in the municipality of Stimlje/Shtime.
No mention of this torture in indictment. unarmed, but wait according to witnesses:
HRW: I heard the police ask them [the men] where is the headquarters of our army [the KLA], and they answered where it was.
So, Racak really was KLA military stronghold, terrorist base, second Srebrenica. Which, according to HRW, means:
All of them (victims) were wearing rubber boots typical of Kosovo farmers rather than military footwear.
But from Rantas testimony we learn following:
Milosevic::
But in Dunjic's report, for example, it says these military boots
13 on 23 persons. As you can see, they were not able to take these boots off
14 because had they removed the footwear because of religious custom, they
15 would have removed the footwear of all the persons. But they removed only
16 the footwear of those wearing military boots. They were unable to take
17 off the underwear showing their military status.
and much, much more
9 Q. Mrs. Ranta, on all these photographs here, you have people wearing
10 military boots. Here, have a look at them. And in the report of
11 Professor Dunjic and other professors, expert witnesses, it says that they
12 even have markings, a "O" signifying that they were made in Germany. And
13 here, have a look at these photographs. There you can see the military
14 boots.
Source:
http://www.un.org/icty/transe54/030312ED.htm Conclusion: So-called Hague tribunal's indictment is not a serious legal document supported by probative evidence.
49
posted on
01/26/2004 5:31:43 PM PST
by
moroz
(Genesis 49:16-18)
To: moroz
ut they are not easily foundThe low expectations started at that point and were completely fulfilled when you quoted Milosevic's attempt to try to run the 'Military footwear' BS past Ranta during his cross examination as if it were, how would you put it - 'probative' evidence.
Try it again, but with some intellectual honesty this time, Ok?
50
posted on
01/26/2004 6:26:37 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
I think the Serbs themselves disagree with your description of Milosevic's defense:
http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,8277274%255E1702,00.html I guess we haven't pumped in 75 to 100 million dollars (in a nation of under 10 million) to "opposition" figures lately like we did in 1999 (about the same time we "conservatives" were complaining about foreign money in our campaigns). I guess they are too busy killing each other.
51
posted on
01/26/2004 6:45:43 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: moroz
The indictment was written without evidence by Nancy Patterson. Later shreds of data were spliced in to resemble legal document. The problem ICTY encountered were HRW transparent that were used as "evidence". That's why there are no approximate ages and positive I.D.
THis is entrapment, not indictment.
If Nancy Patterson wrote Indictment without evidence in any court in U.S.A. she would probably lose licence to practice law.
No wonder Ms. Patterson faded into obscurity after her stint as prosecutor in ICTY.
She ought to be disbarred.
52
posted on
01/26/2004 6:49:11 PM PST
by
DTA
(you ain't seen nothing yet)
To: Hoplite
53
posted on
01/26/2004 6:50:27 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: Burkeman1
Marion Barry was re-elected as well.
Guess all that talk about him smoking crack was just the MAN trying to victimize him.
I really don't know where you're going with the Tibet thing.
54
posted on
01/26/2004 7:22:43 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
Not going anywhere- just thought you would like the article and find it interesting. LOL on the Marion Barry thing. And I can go one better- Mayor Curley from Boston was also elected from prison.
55
posted on
01/26/2004 7:29:53 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: Burkeman1
Great, Barry and Curley - what was the point of your post about Milosevic being re-elected then?
56
posted on
01/26/2004 7:46:20 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
Neither had an opposition being pumped full of foreign money.
57
posted on
01/26/2004 7:51:52 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: Burkeman1
Neither had stolen elections in the past either.
Strike three, and Slobo was out, thanks in part to the election monitoring system our funds helped emplace.
58
posted on
01/26/2004 7:57:42 PM PST
by
Hoplite
To: Hoplite
Wrong- Curley had stolen elections (The Rascal King). As did Gore most likely as well in the popular vote at least but the Bush admin was to chicken poop to say so as it would bring up some very unPC issues- so they ran to the USSC like cowards.
It looks like the people who view the Slobo trial on TV daily- namely the Serbs- disagree with you. The same people who ousted him in a "popular" revolution in 1999 (with the aid of multi millions from us and the backing of gangsters- but shhhhh!)
You are indeed a true believer. God bless you.
59
posted on
01/26/2004 8:06:15 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: Burkeman1
You've taken the Talking Head's "stop making sense" advice too close to heart.
Let's not waste any more of each other's time.
60
posted on
01/26/2004 8:41:55 PM PST
by
Hoplite
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson