There are names, but they are not easily found. You have to dig deep to find them, and there is good reason for that. Much of “indictment” does not make any sense.
According to “witnesses” of alleged massacre “Yugoslav Government War Crimes in Racak”
Source (HRW):
http://www.hrw.org/campaigns/kosovo98/racak.shtml Ten households of the Beqa family live in the part of Racak called Upper Mahalla on the edge of the village. According to one member of the family, whose son and husband were both killed, at around 7:00 a.m. thirty members of the Beqa family tried to run toward the nearby forest when they heard the police. She told Human Rights Watch that more then forty policemen wearing blue uniforms and without masks began shooting at them from a distance of twenty meters from the top of the hill.
More “then forty policemen” armed with automatic weapons “without masks began shooting at them from a distance of twenty meters”, and result -- only 3 dead and 2 wounded!!! Incredible luck, I guess.
Second, only alleged victim old 22 years is SHABANI, Bajrush; note that he is not Beqa he is Shabani.
Source (“indictment”):
http://www.un.org/icty/indictment/english/mil-ii990524e.htm Also note, there is mention only of BEQIRI “victims” in the “indictment”, there are no Beqa on that list.
According to the “indictment”,
MEHMETI, Bajram Male
MEHMETI, Hanumshah Female
are victims. Allegedly they are villagers living in Racak, everybody should know them but there is no mention of age. Or any other data! No address, no ID, no description – nothing, nada, zero! And they are not only ones. For 24 names!!!! out of 45 they are not able to tell age (at least approximately) for fellow villagers.
Take for example this:
HRW: Searching for Weapons and the Killing of Nazmi Ymeri (76)
“indictment” ZYMERI, Njazi Male (mo age)
HRW: Mufail Hajrizi
“indictment” - HAJRIZI, Myfail
But let us not dwell on such details - names and positive ID.
What really amazes me is Serb incompetence! Their policeman and soldiers are really bungling and inept!
HRW: Two or three policeman beat them with wooden sticks. One was kicking them in the face with his boots. The others were just watching. It was terrible. The men were screaming, and their heads were covered with blood. A policeman locked me in the cellar with the women, but I could hear screaming for the next half an hour.
They are beating people “with wooden sticks” for half an hour and they are still able to scream!! Amazing toughness. It is strange and gets stranger!
HRW: One bullet crossed through his pocket, and another one is still in his belt.
And so on, and so forth.
HRW: Some time around 1:00 p.m. the police led the twenty-three men out of Osmani's yard.
“indictment” - A group of approximately 25 men attempted to hide in a building, but were discovered by the Serb police.
HRW: His throat and half his face had been cut by a knife. On the top of his head was a wooden stick with some paper.
Or this
Journalists at the scene early on January 16 told Human Rights Watch that many of these twenty-three men also had signs of torture, such as missing finger nails.
According to so-called “indictment”.
In one such incident, on 15 January 1999, 45 unarmed Kosovo Albanians were murdered in the village of Racak in the municipality of Stimlje/Shtime.
No mention of this torture in “indictment”. “unarmed”, but wait according to witnesses:
HRW: I heard the police ask them [the men] where is the headquarters of our army [the KLA], and they answered where it was.
So, Racak really was KLA military stronghold, terrorist base, second Srebrenica. Which, according to HRW, means:
All of them (“victims”) were wearing rubber boots typical of Kosovo farmers rather than military footwear.
But from Ranta’s testimony we learn following:
Milosevic::
But in Dunjic's report, for example, it says these military boots
13 on 23 persons. As you can see, they were not able to take these boots off
14 because had they removed the footwear because of religious custom, they
15 would have removed the footwear of all the persons. But they removed only
16 the footwear of those wearing military boots. They were unable to take
17 off the underwear showing their military status.
and much, much more
9 Q. Mrs. Ranta, on all these photographs here, you have people wearing
10 military boots. Here, have a look at them. And in the report of
11 Professor Dunjic and other professors, expert witnesses, it says that they
12 even have markings, a "O" signifying that they were made in Germany. And
13 here, have a look at these photographs. There you can see the military
14 boots.
Source:
http://www.un.org/icty/transe54/030312ED.htm Conclusion: So-called Hague tribunal's indictment is not a serious legal document supported by probative evidence.