To: dmzTahoe
The only way to end the McNabb hype and fraud is to let it leak out to the press that he is a conservative, Republican Bush-backer...let's not forget that it was rush who picked this fight, not donovan. oh right, we're not FORGETTING, just IGNORING...
61 posted on
01/19/2004 9:52:38 AM PST by
Libertarian4Bush
(may contain traces of peanuts)
To: Libertarian4Bush
shesh, if you think it was rush who picked the fight with McNabb, you sure weren't listening to what Rush said initially that started all of this.
It was the MEDIA Rush was talking about not McNabb per se.
Sounds to me like you're just another Rush hater.
71 posted on
01/19/2004 9:56:22 AM PST by
el_texicano
("Anyone who says he can see through women is missing a lot." - Groucho)
To: Libertarian4Bush
Rush picked a fight with the media - not McPansy
83 posted on
01/19/2004 9:59:53 AM PST by
CyberCowboy777
(Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.)
To: Libertarian4Bush
"let's not forget that it was rush who picked this fight, not donovan. oh right, we're not FORGETTING, just IGNORING..."Neither forgetting nor ignoring. Just telling it "the way it is" like howard Cosell used to.
It was a sad and sorry display by the media's "chosen one", Donovan McNabb.
The Eagles won this year in spite of McNabb, not because of him. They lost the NFC Championship game because of his lack of effort and his willingness to take himself out of a pressure situetion and turn over the chance to go to the Super Bowl to a journeyman QB. Can one imagine a Favre, Montana, Staubach (any of the great ones) going out without a fight?
If McQuit is as great as they say, would not a 50% McNabb be more effective than a 100% Detmer?
84 posted on
01/19/2004 10:00:02 AM PST by
dmzTahoe
(1.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson