To: Jeff Gannon
He should have given them all a recess appointment.
To: Jeff Gannon
My only question of this is: Why did he wait so long? He has known since Day 1 that the Dems would deep-six and delay on every jurist he puts up. As soon as a recess comes up he should just install them.
3 posted on
01/19/2004 7:39:29 AM PST by
theDentist
(Boston: So much Liberty, you can buy a Politician already owned by someone else.)
To: Jeff Gannon
Ralph Neas, NOW, NARAL, Daschle and Schumer are all outraged, thus proving that this is a good thing.
4 posted on
01/19/2004 7:42:08 AM PST by
sam_paine
(X .................................)
To: Jeff Gannon
I'm saddened, and troubled that Sen Tammy Daschound (D-Munchkinland) did not say he was ''deeply disappointed, etc, etc, etc.''
5 posted on
01/19/2004 7:42:16 AM PST by
Condor51
("Leftists are moral and intellectual parasites." -- Standing Wolf)
To: Jeff Gannon
Stand by for an endless series of Rep ads this fall, as the RNC replays Liberal *ssh*les in the Senate slandering conservative judicial nominees.
7 posted on
01/19/2004 7:44:45 AM PST by
pabianice
To: Jeff Gannon
How dare he! Shock! Outrage! Into the streets! ;)
I suppose a three year obstruction process and a final executive appointment could work pretty well at that (Didn't krinton pioneer this method?). Now, let's see if Robert Bork could be persuaded to return to the bench...
To: Registered
Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY), a Judiciary Committee member, called the appointment "a finger in the eye"
Graphic request.
14 posted on
01/19/2004 7:56:10 AM PST by
Xthe17th
("What is the use of being elected or re-elected unless you stand for something?" - Grover Cleveland)
To: Jeff Gannon
When the democrats start to whine and cry and complain, you KNOW the President is doing something right! Good job!
To: Jeff Gannon
Bush Defies Senate DemocratsNo. They defied HIM. They can give advise & council...they're not supposed to fillibuster, or gain a super majority. They was not the intent of our Forefathers.
18 posted on
01/19/2004 8:02:17 AM PST by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Jeff Gannon
Oh, he's out for the throat of the Dem party. The Timing is absolutely excellent. No muss. No fuss. No more filibuster. Looks like Hillary! and co have been forcibly dministered a dose of Senate Ex Lax. At a time when they can do NOTHING about it but whine that the president is "frustrated with the slow pace of his dismemberment of the federal judiciary," and "forcibly installed" Pickering.
The above is a real quote from this article in The Chatanoogan... which also says Bush is Rove's "sock puppet". Sound familiar?
19 posted on
01/19/2004 8:02:28 AM PST by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Jeff Gannon
About time.
To: Jeff Gannon
So far I am entirely satisfied with Bush's handling of judicial appointments, probably the single most important thing he needs to do as president.
Unlike earlier Republican presidents he has come up with genuinely conservative candidates and has stuck with them, instead of withdrawing them after a token fight and putting up lousy "compromise" candidates instead, like Justice Souter.
It would have been politically destructive for him to rush a bunch of interim appointments. Keep in mind that interim appointments last only a year, and what we need is to put hundreds of judges on the bench for a lifetime. It wouldn't help politically if he gave the impression of being rushed and arbitrary about the process.
Most important is to put heavy pressure on the Democrats to break their obstruction of appointments. That can be done by a) increasing the number of Republican senators in the next congress; and b) demonstrating to sitting Democrat senators, especially southerners, that they are risking their seats by their obstructionism.
Ever since the impeachment trial, the Democrats have hung together on every important issue, and regardless of the potential political damage, unlike the Republicans. Bush needs to break that habit decisively. This is the way to do it.
As long as he refrains from making BAD judicial appointments, I think he can be trusted after reelection, on this fundamental issue.
22 posted on
01/19/2004 8:10:45 AM PST by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Jeff Gannon
Dear Mr. President, Please rescind Judge Pickering's recess appointment. The holier-than-thou conservatives don't like your motives behind the appointment. It's wonderful that you did make this appointment, but they still don't like it.
37 posted on
01/19/2004 9:00:53 AM PST by
rdb3
(If Jesse Jack$on and I meet, face to face, it's gonna be a misunderstanding...)
To: Jeff Gannon
hrmn... Chuckie Schumer, Paddy Leahy, Tommy Dasshole, ole Weak-Neas, and the shrewish crones of NOW and NARAL...
All the usual suspects. All the usual pap.
almost all: what has Teddy to say of this?
as if I care, aside from possible amusement value.
Finally, Dubya has begun to paddle the damned dims on a subject which will matter after he is gone.
About damned time.
49 posted on
01/19/2004 10:12:25 AM PST by
King Prout
("Islam" is to "Peace" as a Zen Koan is to a binary logical "if-then" statement)
To: Jeff Gannon
Just heard about this GREAT NEWS !!.. I missed this big news while I was in Drill Sgt. School...
David
53 posted on
01/28/2004 9:20:04 AM PST by
davidosborne
(www.davidosborne.net)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson