Skip to comments.
Feds arrest medical marijauna patients the moment State dismissed charges.
marijuana.com ^
| 1 -14 -03
| William Dolphin
Posted on 01/16/2004 7:47:17 AM PST by freepatriot32
Feds Grab Medical Marijuana Patients from California State Courtroom
Couple Arrested As Attorneys and Judge Meet in Chambers; State Charges Dismissed
Press Conference, Emergency Action at Sacramento Federal Building at Noon Friday
Sacramento (Wednesday, January 14, 2004) In a stunning display of duplicitous double dealing, federal agents yesterday seized two medical marijuana patients from a California state courtroom after the local prosecutor lured the couples defense counsel into the judges chambers to dismiss the state charges filed against them.
David Davidson and Cynthia Blake were in state court on a motion seeking to have charges of marijuana cultivation and distribution dismissed, based on the Compassionate Use Act of 1996 which made medical use of marijuana legal in California. Both Ms. Blake and Mr. Davidson have doctors authorizations to use marijuana for medical conditions. Fewer than 30 plants, little more than a pound of dried marijuana and some cuttings were seized by the Tehama Sheriffs Department during the July 29th raid on the Red Bluff home of Ms. Blake that resulted in her and Mr. Davidsons arrest.
As Davidson and Blakes attorneys, Omar Figueroa and Shari Greenberger, met in the judges chambers with prosecutor Lynn Strom to discuss the details of dismissing the charges, prosecutor Strom informed them that she was dropping the charges only because federal officers were at that moment arresting Davidson and Blake in the courtroom.
These federal arrests are utterly outrageous, said Steph Sherer, Executive Director of Americans for Safe Access, a national medical marijuana coalition. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has already said they are violating the Constitution when they arrest patients. And now they are tricking defense attorneys to separate them from their clients. How many rights have to be trampled before we fix this?
Americans for Safe Access has called for emergency actions on Friday at noon at federal buildings across the country. Demonstrations are currently planned in Los Angeles, San Francisco, Oakland, Sacramento, Cincinnatti, and Spokane, with more in the works.
A press conference with Ms Blake, Mr. Davidson, attorney Tony Serra, and Steph Sherer will also take place in front of the Sacramento federal building at 5th and I. David Davidson and Cynthia Blake were released yesterday on $50,000 bond each, and will be arraigned Friday at 2 pm in Sacramento. The government alleges that they were conspiring to cultivate and distribute 1000+ plants (a 10 year mandatory minimum if convicted); and that they were in actual possession of 100+ plants.( a 5 year mandatory minimum if convicted)
Their lawyers are confident they will be exonerated. You may recall that Bryan Epis was convicted in this same court of conspiracy (based on some misrepresented computer files).
Please organize something locally for tomorrow if you can - sample press release, flyers, and Citation orders can be downloaded from: ASA
WHAT: Press Conference and protest of the federal arrest of David Davidson and Cynthia Blake.
WHO: David Davidson and Cynthia Blake. Attorney Tony Serra. Steph Sherer, Executive Director of Americans for Safe Access.
WHEN: Friday, January 16, 2004 at Noon
WHERE: Federal building in Sacramento (5th and I). Federal buildings across the country.
A grassroots coalition of 5,500 patients, doctors and advocates, Americans for Safe Access is the leading national organization working on medical marijuana. For more information, contact William Dolphin (510) 919-1498.
# # #
Hilary McQuie Campaign Director Americans for Safe Access 1678 Shattuck Ave. #317 Berkeley, CA 94709 510-486-8083 www.safeaccessnow.org
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aclulist; billofrights; california; constitutionlist; donutwatch; govwatch; libertarians; noteworthy; philosophytime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
is it just me or is everyone having a hard time telling the difference from george bushs federal agents and bill clintons? Any day now i expect to turn on the news and see a religious compound burning down with women and children in it but the firestarters would have a (R) next to thier name so it would be peachy keen right ?
To: freepatriot32
The Federal government is fighting a rearguard action on this issue. I predict that, within a decade, marijuana will be legal for personal use in this country.
2
posted on
01/16/2004 7:52:59 AM PST
by
Modernman
(Providence protects idiots, drunkards, children and the United States of America- Otto von Bismarck)
To: freepatriot32
They pulled this same thing in Santa Cruz County about a year ago. The whole thing is like the Twilight Zone.
3
posted on
01/16/2004 7:56:01 AM PST
by
EggsAckley
(...................Repeal the Fourteenth Amendment.......................)
To: jmc813; **California; *ACLU_List; *libertarians; *gov_watch; *Constitution List; *Donut watch; ...
ping
4
posted on
01/16/2004 7:56:08 AM PST
by
freepatriot32
(today it was the victory act tomorrow its victory coffee, victory cigarettes...)
To: freepatriot32; Admin Moderator
Why was this thread SBRed?
Is the site linked obnoxious?
The story itself certainly seems appropriate to this forum.
5
posted on
01/16/2004 7:58:25 AM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: freepatriot32
is it just me .......
Probably.
The issue here is the federal law and a general California reluctance to eliminate pot.
The federal law is being enforced in California. The folks in California are not being allowed to cherry pick which laws they will obey and which laws they will not obey.
If you can't differentiate Ashcroft from the the Clinton Alcoholic Lesbo Reno, there is a significant problem.
6
posted on
01/16/2004 7:58:26 AM PST
by
bert
(Have you offended a liberal today?)
To: Admin Moderator
Oh , short-bussed, not SBRed.
Same question.
7
posted on
01/16/2004 7:59:48 AM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: headsonpikes
Oops! NOW it's SBRed!
Pardon my French, but WTF?
8
posted on
01/16/2004 8:01:41 AM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: headsonpikes
Because the owners don't want you to know that busting patients is high on the Bush prirority list.
9
posted on
01/16/2004 8:22:36 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
Think they'll try this tactic with the Denver case?
To: philman_36
They'll keep it up until local voters hold local elected officials responsible. The Feds busting patients who aren't violating State law is one thing, State law enforcment being complicit in the arrests is another.
11
posted on
01/16/2004 8:36:34 AM PST
by
Wolfie
To: headsonpikes; Admin Moderator
thats a good question it cant be because of a flame war since there isnt one on this thread and this is definitly news that should be on free republic unless support of the tenth amendment has all of the sudden becomea liberal issue best left to the democrat underground forums ?
12
posted on
01/16/2004 9:33:06 AM PST
by
freepatriot32
(today it was the victory act tomorrow its victory coffee, victory cigarettes...)
To: bert; freepatriot32
If you can't differentiate Ashcroft from the the Clinton Alcoholic Lesbo Reno, there is a significant problem. I think that was what freepatriot32 was saying.
13
posted on
01/16/2004 10:46:05 AM PST
by
Oztrich Boy
(The King of Cups expects a picnic. But today is not his birthday)
To: philman_36; headsonpikes; freepatriot32; jmc813; No King but Jesus; Protagoras; William Terrell; ...
Found this little tidbit in another article.
When they did, Tehama County Sheriff's deputies -- acting on federal authority under a local-federal drug task force's auspices -- arrested the pair on the federal charges, issued last week by a grand jury in Sacramento.
So not only are the State's attorneys playing for the Feds, so are the local troops. National Police Force, anyone?
14
posted on
01/16/2004 1:48:05 PM PST
by
Wolfie
To: bert
The issue here is the federal law and a general California reluctance to eliminate pot. Query: Exactly how would you go about eliminating pot?
15
posted on
01/16/2004 1:57:45 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: Admin Moderator
I'm in agreement with these other folks. Why in the world did you move this article to the Smokey Back Room and out of the line of sight?
This is a rather egregious development in the tactics of the feds, don't you think? Is it your purpose to screen this kind of federal brutality, playing fast and loose with our justice system, from the rest of the forum?
Why would you want to hide it?
Do you condone this duplicitous, vile alliance on the part of our federal and state justice system? What if it occured in an area of regulation like firearms, which it could easily do, having established preecedent and become custom?
Let everybody in the forum see it. Let them consider its implications. I would have expected this sort of thing from DU.
16
posted on
01/16/2004 2:17:26 PM PST
by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: William Terrell
There is apparently no effective way to eliminate pot.
There are laws and they should be obeyed.
Otherwise it'll be open season on lawyers.
17
posted on
01/16/2004 2:50:47 PM PST
by
bert
(Have you offended a liberal today?)
To: William Terrell; Wolfie; jmc813; headsonpikes
good question, why move to the SBR, when this is very interesting case
arrest someone on fed charges as case is being dismissed on local level.
I guess they were guilty of violating the interstate laws.
18
posted on
01/16/2004 2:57:52 PM PST
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
To: vin-one
Any bets as to wheather the word "interstate" appears anywhere on the warrant?
19
posted on
01/16/2004 3:01:16 PM PST
by
tacticalogic
(Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
To: tacticalogic
depends on the odds your offering, but they would have to be pretty darn good.
20
posted on
01/16/2004 3:14:28 PM PST
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson