Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's immigration plan hurts re-election war chest
The Washington Times ^ | January 16, 2004 | Bill Sammon

Posted on 01/15/2004 10:20:48 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182

Edited on 07/12/2004 4:12:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last
To: Action-America
Action-America. Are you running for some sort of office? I ask this because your page looks like some sort of political ad.
201 posted on 01/16/2004 8:21:15 PM PST by jim35 (A vote for Tancredo is a vote for the DemocRATs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
>>>When I think of amnesty, it think of illegals being granted the right to stay and apply for citizenship.

There are many examples of amnesty. Giving legal status to millions of illegal aliens without exacting a penalty, is another example of amnesty.

>>>I would not call a "temporary worker" permit amnesty.

Your wrong. The definitions of pardon and amnesty are quite clear.

pardon: "a release from the legal penalties of an offense"
amnesty: "the act of an authority by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals"

202 posted on 01/16/2004 8:33:50 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
>>>I would not call a "temporary worker" permit amnesty.<<<

Your wrong. The definitions of pardon and amnesty are quite clear.

pardon: "a release from the legal penalties of an offense" amnesty: "the act of an authority by which pardon is granted to a large group of individuals"

I say you're wrong. I don't think a temporary pardon for the purpose of giving people work permits fits the common understanding of amnesty.

We can split hairs if you like over the definition of amnesty forever, but in the end I still support Bush's proposal.

203 posted on 01/16/2004 9:27:10 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: jim35

Action-America. Are you running for some sort of office? I ask this because your page looks like some sort of political ad.

No. I have thought about it a few times. But, the only positions that I have held have been precinct chairman a few times and I have been a delegate to some state GOP conventions. When I had had the time to campaign for a political office, I was in a heavily Rat district (state and national) and just didn't feel like wasting what little time I had on a campaign that couldn't win. Now that I am in a Republican district, I have some serious obligations that take up a lot of my time and make it impossible for me to campaign.

So, since I can't run for office, I have been writing for Action America for about 5 years now, in the hope that I can influence some voters and those who do run for and hold office. When I began writing and the site was only a sub site on the Michael Reagan web site, taking around 100 to 500 hits a month, I didn't really take a lot of time making it look good. However, since that time, our traffic has grown exponentially and we have had to register our own name and have upgraded the site several times, to try to justify the traffic that we were receiving. Today, Action America regularly takes over 150,000 hits per month and has peaked at over 316,000 hits in a single month. What amazes me (and pleases me no end), is that so many people want to read what I write.

In a way, I feel like I am obligated to our readers to maintain a certain level of quality and professionalism on the site and that's what makes me keep trying to improve it. My FR profile page is somewhat like the Action America "About" page, with some personal things added at the bottom, so it too, may have a campaign type of look. In a way, I am campaigning. I'm campaigning for common sense and conservative action at the polls. But alas, I'm not campaigning for me.

 

204 posted on 01/16/2004 10:37:06 PM PST by Action-America (Best President: Reagan * Worst President: Klinton * Worst GOP President: Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
>>>I say you're wrong.
>>>We can split hairs...

This isn't about splitting hairs. The words "pardon" and "amnesty" have specific definitions for use in American English. If you choose to ignore what these words actually stand for, you're being intellectually dishonest.

>>>... but in the end I still support Bush's proposal.

Another member of the pro-amnesty/open borders contingent. Gotcha!

205 posted on 01/16/2004 10:41:29 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
This isn't about splitting hairs. The words "pardon" and "amnesty" have specific definitions for use in American English. If you choose to ignore what these words actually stand for, you're being intellectually dishonest.

Oh please. Anybody can see that there is a difference between a temporary worker status and a permanent amnesty for illegal immigrants.

You can stick to your nit-picking, narrow-minded legalistic generalizations in order to condemn any differing opinions on this subject...but don't even try lecturing me on intellectual honesty.

Jorge" but in the end I still support Bush's proposal."

Another member of the pro-amnesty/open borders contingent. Gotcha!

I oppose open borders.

Why don't you try reading people's posts instead of assigning them positions you feel most comfortable arguing against.
Just a suggestion.

206 posted on 01/16/2004 11:10:44 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I see you still have your intellectual blinders on. LOL
Face it. Bush`s immigration proposals are wrongheaded.

>>>Why don't you try reading people's posts...

I always read peoples posts. You said: "...in the end I still support Bush's proposal."

Bush`s proposals are all about granting legal status to illegal aliens. And no matter how upset you get and no matter how much you engage in your usual juvenile outbursts, in the real world Bush`s proposals stand for a pardon and that means amnesty.

207 posted on 01/16/2004 11:30:30 PM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
Bush`s proposals are all about granting legal status to illegal aliens. And no matter how upset you get and no matter how much you engage in your usual juvenile outbursts, in the real world Bush`s proposals stand for a pardon and that means amnesty.

Bush's proposal has been laid out and explained to you enough times for you to understand.

A temporary worker status IS NOT the same as total amnesty.

The fact that you refuse to acknowledge the difference more than proves your intellectual dishonesty on this subject.

I can understand your characterizing a rational presentation of the facts as a "juvenile outburst" considering your apparent inability to articulate a coherent and consistant position on this issue.
You're wrong and you know it.

208 posted on 01/16/2004 11:41:57 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
"Fundamentally, this is a tough decision the president made to address a tough issue,"

It's not that difficult a decision Mr. President. People are breaking the law. You're supposed to enforce the law. Instead of enforcing the law, you're twisting it so that the lawbreakers aren't breaking the law anymore.

That's absolutely CLINTONIAN!

209 posted on 01/17/2004 12:02:44 AM PST by America's Resolve (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing (hint FRA GER RUS CA UN))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
A lot of the problem is the vagueness of Bush's proposals --- he never mentioned what would be done with those blue card holders who decide they don't want to go back in 3 years, he doesn't say what happens to those who aren't matched to a job --- for example all the illegal unwed mothers from Mexico who are here now collecting welfare checks and food stamps on their anchor babies. It just sounds like we'll end up with a new form of legal worker --- a blue card holder who didn't feel like getting a green card before.
210 posted on 01/17/2004 6:43:27 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
I read PresBush`s entire speech. It's self explanatory. For your benefit, I'll mention this one more time. The President calls for granting legal status to illegal aliens and that is a pardon, which in effect is amnesty. Also, nowhere does Bush call for sealing the borders shut. Those are the facts as they exist and there is no way you can distort the factual truth and be taken seriously on this issue. These continued rants on your part only further damages your credibility.

My position has been very consistent and very coherent. I oppose any form of amnesty that would lead to a legal status for illegal aliens. I have advocated sealing US borders for years. I support going through the proper channels that leads to legal immigration.

Since Bush gave his immigration reform speech, poll after poll has shown a majority of American's oppose his proposals. That includes the current FreeRepublic poll "Question", which states 67% of FReepers oppose Bush`s plan. The majority of threads posted on FR since Bush`s speech are opposed to his plan. You are in the minority on this issue and history is not on your side either.

David Limbaugh summed it up well. He wrote:

"It's a muddled plan, with dubious goals and inevitably negative consequences – which doesn't bode well for the president's image as a decisive leader with moral clarity.

Beyond undermining the rule of law, this plan devalues the uniqueness of American citizenship by trivializing the laws aimed at making it selective and a special privilege. It sends a message that illegal immigration is a trifling matter.

President Bush, whom I deeply admire on many levels, has stretched the patience of conservatives too far on this one. He should reconsider."

211 posted on 01/17/2004 11:04:33 AM PST by Reagan Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
What, an unwilling donor for a willing candidate?
212 posted on 01/17/2004 11:06:03 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ben Ficklin; Happy2BMe
A FReeper's Guide To Immigration Reform

"What remains to be seen is if this country has the capacity to accommodate, and assimilate, an unending wave of mass immigration ¯ because failure to do so will result in a balkanized, fragmented, strife-torn and dysfunctional America."

Federation for American Immigration Reform - FAIR

~ Take the FReeper Immigration Reform Poll ~

213 posted on 01/17/2004 11:23:13 AM PST by Happy2BMe (Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Open borders = closed wallet, here.
214 posted on 01/17/2004 12:46:42 PM PST by lodwick (Wake up, America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
I support our President. I am, however witholding the contribution my wife ask me to make until this disaster is sorted out. I will not be a part of the dismantling of our wonderful nation, its heritage, culture, and borders.

I suspect that this will blow over. It is curious to note that here in Iowa a columnist observed demonrats can ask to see identity proof for participation in the Iowa caucus--but strongly resist such efforts along our borders or for national elections. Gee that is a real baffler.

`
215 posted on 01/18/2004 3:55:36 PM PST by petertare (truth, justice and the American way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
I quit donating to the Republican Party and Bush as of the $2,000,000,000,000.00 Medicare Prescription Drug Entitlement. I use to be good for a few thousand a year. Now, I may give to Club For Growth, but I don't give to big spending government groups like the Republican Party.
216 posted on 01/18/2004 6:10:09 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (Mullahs swinging from lamp posts....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
As was just proven on another thread, GW Bush has spent less on discretionary domestic spending (% of GDP) than did Ronald Reagan at the same point in his presidency.

That's pretty powerful data.
217 posted on 01/19/2004 2:16:06 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: kphockey2
I understand.

I did take my window sign down and my bumper sticker off. I also contacted the reelection office that I would not campaign for President Bush until he changed his mind.

It hurt too, because I like him and I think he has done some great things for us. ( Shh...I am keeping a couple in reserve, in case he changes his mind.)

I am trying to stay hopeful.

218 posted on 01/19/2004 4:28:04 PM PST by Diva Betsy Ross (Every heart beats true for the red ,white and blue!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
and I lost two checks from people who had wanted to come, but wouldn't," Mr. Kent said.

Awwwwwwwww!

219 posted on 01/19/2004 6:31:44 PM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FITZ
A lot of the problem is the vagueness of Bush's proposals ---

He did not write a bill.

He proposed some guidelines for congress to do so.

The law is a blank slate at the present time and we get to fill in the blanks.

I don't know how complicated that can be, and I believe he will sign a bill that has lot's of teeth in it.

How can anyone complain (except the illegals) about a bill that has not been written, but only in the concept stage with general guidelines?

People calling it amnesty and saying it has no teeth are very premature.

220 posted on 01/19/2004 6:40:37 PM PST by Cold Heat ("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-242 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson