Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We still need help, NPR tells its listeners
Christian Science Monitor ^ | January 16, 2004 | Tommy Nguyen

Posted on 01/15/2004 5:26:42 PM PST by sarcasm

A huge gift to NPR may mean fewer donations for its member stations

Los Angeles resident Oliver Kendall admits that he hasn't renewed his subscription to his local National Public Radio affiliate, KCRW. Although the medical student cites financial difficulties as an excuse for not contributing, the fact that he tuned out KCRW during its 10-day pledge drive last summer certainly didn't help. "I resent KCRW pledge drives and I avoid them at all cost," says Mr. Kendall.

So one can imagine the rejoicing of Kendall and other KCRW listeners when their hometown newspaper, the Los Angeles Times, declared that the "days when National Public Radio is forced to ask member stations to hold fundraising drives just so it can stay on the air are over."

In that Nov. 7 front-page article, the Times reported on the more than $200 million gift NPR would receive from the estate of the late Joan Kroc, widow of Ray Kroc, the founder of the McDonald's fast-food empire.

But at least one public radio listener, KCRW's general manager Ruth Seymour, reacted differently. "I just about flipped," says Ms. Seymour, who remembers standing on a busy street corner in Manhattan when she read the Times story. "I was screaming into the telephone: 'You have to get me through to the editor!' "

The truth is that the Kroc gift will have no effect on the financial needs or the fundraising efforts of NPR's 750 member stations.

Instead of receiving financial support from NPR, these stations have to pay for NPR programming

In the case of KCRW, the cost is nearly $1.2 million a year. In addition, the stations are solely responsible for their own operating costs, which is the bulk of their yearly budget.

Also, since it takes about $800 million a year to run NPR and its member stations, the $200 million gift is "not the savior of public radio," says NPR spokeswoman Jessamyn Sarmiento.

The Times ran a correction and, a week later, a second piece that clarified the situation. However, the second piece was deep in the paper on page 12 - where it was likely to be viewed by many fewer potential donors.

But if the Kroc gift was able to confuse the Times, clearly much of the public had already been confused long before they read the story.

"No doubt we have a lot of ground to cover to inform the public about the differences between NPR and its member stations," says Ms. Sarmiento, "and where the money will go."

(The money will go entirely to NPR's endowment fund, which will yield about $10 million a year.)

But according to Bill Davis, president of Southern California Public Radio, damage was done to an already off-the-mark public perception.

"Clearly, a lot of people think that when they're sending their support to their public stations, they're writing a check to NPR," says Mr. Davis.

That was partly responsible, says Mr. Davis, for the poor pledge-drive performance of his KPCC station, which serves the large Los Angeles suburb of Pasadena. In December KPCC missed its $1.3 million goal by nearly 25 percent, the largest disappointment in the station's pledge-drive history.

Although he also blames technical difficulties that occurred during the 10-day drive, Davis says that, based on anecdotal feedback and calls from listeners, there is "no doubt in my mind" that the L.A. Times publicity hurt giving to the station.

"How much of that 25 percent can be attributed to the publicity surrounding the Kroc gift, I really can't say," he adds. "My gut instinct says it's probably about half."

As NPR affiliates head into their own fundraising drives in the coming months, station hosts are debating how to best treat the Kroc publicity during this economic downturn when many listeners are already looking for reasons to do less giving.

KCRW's Ms. Seymour predicts the gift will have "no effect" on KCRW's upcoming drive, starting on Jan. 29, because of the station's core group of "loyal and very informed" listeners.

But Laura Walker, president of New York City's WNYC, thinks the station will see an interesting winter drive on Feb. 20.

"I imagine we'll get some questions why we need to pay NPR $2 million a year," says Ms. Walker, whose station pays the largest dues of any NPR affiliate. "I anticipate that many of our donors and members will be confused, thinking that we received that money."

But a generous gift is not always a disincentive to other potential donors. Sometimes, say some fundraisers, it can instead inspire others to do the same.

Since Ms. Kroc lived in San Diego and was a local subscriber, the city's KPBS, which includes a television division, received its own funds from the Kroc estate ($5 million).

Although such a large amount going directly to a station might be expected to hurt its fundraising, general manager Doug Myrland says listeners and television viewers might instead see the gift as a huge endorsement, one that will only spur more financial support.

"That's certainly been our experience locally," says Mr. Myrland.

Although KPBS won't hold its next radio pledge drive until Feb. 6, he notes that the station's 17-day television pledge drive last month exceeded its goal by more than 10 percent.

"The gift enables people to understand that we're worthy of significant gifts," says Myrland.

But the average listener doesn't give "significant gifts," and that's why Mr. Kendall finds Myrland's logic a little fuzzy.

"I don't think listeners will give more money because a corporation or an estate has given them millions - that's ridiculous," he says. "I think most listeners will take the opportunity to give less, and maybe use the money differently this year."

Still, Davis says he had great success in the final days of KPCC's drive when the station altered its pitch.

"Then we started saying, 'Mrs. Kroc made an extraordinary gift to NPR, but she also recognized that the gift would not benefit her local station in San Diego. So she made a generous gift to her local station as well. And therefore, let Mrs. Kroc's generosity to her local station inform your support of KPCC.' "

It wasn't enough to raise KPCC to its goal, "but our last-day syndrome was huge," says Davis.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: defundnpr; defundpbsnow; joankroc; npr; nprschadenfreude; schadenfreude
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: sarcasm
Maybe if they weren't so busy making certain liberal pals rich -- Bill Moyers, for instance -- they wouldn't have to beg.
41 posted on 01/15/2004 8:37:10 PM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destro
That's a fairly keen observation right there. How much does PBS eat up, incidentally? Could chopping them off knock out the other half?
42 posted on 01/15/2004 8:58:24 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
I need help to. Money I can use to pay my rent is being taken away from me in taxes to pay for this lefist NPR crap.
43 posted on 01/15/2004 9:00:10 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("And it's worth the sweat, and it's worth the pain, cause the chance may never come again" -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
are you saying Digital Channel 43 ... low band VHF frequency

CH 43 is in the UHF spectrum (I thought that was evident by the CH # designation). That facility (CH 43) does not seem to be active at the moment (no digital signal on that channel). Daystar is currently enjoying the exercise of their First Amendment rights and the privilege to broadcast on their new CH 2 - in analog form.

The local PBS affiliate *has* possesed an active digital transmission facility - CH 14. It is currently active. They also posses CH 13 analog - a channel they have held for quite a while now and formerly their only TV transmission channel (before CH 2 and long before digital).

It looks like the PBS affiliate also transferred the CH 43 license to Daystar *but* there exists *no* actual antenna or transmitter for CH 43. I don't know. It appears the proper paperwork has been filed with the FCC on CH 43 by Daystar already; there is a filing for both a CP (construction permit) and a station 'Application' (separate processes with the FCC for commercial licensees). I don't know more than that since I haven't pulled up a copy of the actual CP or App paperwork yet ...

44 posted on 01/15/2004 9:01:46 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
It appears, as of 12/15/2003, that NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING, INC. had filed a change to an existing CP (Construction Permit) that had been extended at least once and possibly twice before - I think think they were running out of time and rather than 'lose the license' they bargained with it.

Futher investigation shows that the original filing for a CP for the DTV (CH 43) station occurred back in 2000. Last year they filed for *2* CP extensions.

45 posted on 01/15/2004 9:22:13 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Ann Coulter speaks on gutless Liberals (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Angelus Errare
cut all funding for the arts and kill boondoggles like the crusader and osprey and we can go to the moon and mars on this current budget.
46 posted on 01/15/2004 10:40:02 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Destro
I have little doubt that's likely true ... if only there were a politician who had the guts to stand up and say it.
47 posted on 01/15/2004 10:48:37 PM PST by Angelus Errare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
You have mounted a spirited and well argued defense of the price that the PBS affiliate got for the sale. I salute you for that.

While you have not convinced me that they did not get snookered on the deal, if an investigation does ensue, they would be well served in retaining you to assist them in their defense, as your points could well convince the fact finder.
48 posted on 01/16/2004 10:05:43 AM PST by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson