Posted on 01/15/2004 2:29:13 PM PST by Dog
Yellowcake Found in Rotterdam Harbor May Have Originated in Iraq By Toby Sterling Associated Press Writer Published: Jan 15, 2004
AMSTERDAM, Netherlands (AP) - A recycling company found uranium oxide - a radioactive material also known as yellowcake - in a shipment of scrap steel it believes originally came from Iraq, the company said Thursday. Paul de Bruin, spokesman for Rotterdam-based Jewometaal, said that the shipment was passed on last month from a Jordan metal dealer who was unaware it contained any forbidden materials.
"I've dealt with this man for 15 years and he says he's sure it came from Iraq," De Bruin said. He said Jewometaal had been asked not to reveal the name of the Jordanian exporter while the find was being investigated.
Nuclear experts say that although not highly radioactive, uranium oxide can be processed into enriched uranium usable in a nuclear weapon - but highly advanced technology is needed.
The Dutch Environment Ministry confirmed Thursday that Jewometaal reported the unusual find on Dec. 16. After a preliminary investigation by a company that specializes in removing radioactive waste, the Dutch government decided to call in the International Atomic Energy Agency to investigate further.
A spokesman for the IAEA confirmed the agency had visited Rotterdam on Wednesday but had no further comment.
Environment ministry spokesman Wim van der Weegen said scrap metal companies in the Rotterdam port, which is Europe's largest, report around 200 findings of radioactive material per year, often from old hospital equipment or normal industrial uses.
But the finding of an estimated two pounds of uranium oxide is odd, Van der Weegen said.
Experts said that around 2 pounds of yellowcake, the amount found, would not be useful for either a bomb or fuel.
Dr. Alan Ketering, a researcher at the nuclear research plant at the University of Missouri-Columbia, said yellowcake contains less than 1 percent of U-235 used in nuclear weapons. He said it would need to be refined many times with sophisticated technology before it was dangerous - and the amount found in Rotterdam would not be nearly enough.
"Anybody can dig it up and purify it to make the yellow stuff," he said. "It's the separation of U-235 that people are concerned about."
However, he said there was no obvious non-nuclear industrial use for yellowcake and it would be strange to find it in random scrap metal.
The material was found in a small steel industrial container apparently used to connect pipes or electrical wires, Environment Ministry spokesman Van der Weegen said.
He said it wasn't yet known where the yellowcake originated.
"It could be from anywhere in the world," Van der Weegen said. After testing, the material was shipped to a nuclear waste plant in the Netherlands.
Jordan does not have any known nuclear power plants or weapons and is a signatory to the nuclear test ban treaty.
President Bush came under heavy criticism last year when he asserted in his State of the Union address that Iraq was shopping in Africa for uranium yellowcake - intelligence that turned out to be based on forged documents.
The original suspicions apparently came from a British dossier and Britain's Foreign Office continued to maintain Iraq was trying to buy uranium in Niger, although no evidence was offered.
Last year, the United States agreed to pay $3.4 million to install radioactivity detectors in Rotterdam to scan a fraction of the 6 million containers that pass through it annually for hidden radioactive material.
However, scrap metal companies are already outfitted with detectors, and Jewometaal found the radioactive material with its own equipment.
AP-ES-01-15-04 1719EST
Like you can't use "jellocake" for a dirty bomb and like everyone is walking around with the crap! Yeah. sure!.
"I ordered a yellow cake, and this is what they give me. I said, 'you cannot even eat this with green tea and felafel, what is this?' They said 'we do not know, great leader'. I said 'go out and get me a yellow cake, you fools. And go bury this stuff too'. Then I had the thieves put in a wood chipper to teach them a lesson."
Actually, since there were only 36 of them, Kofi Anan, the EU, the DNC, the Dimo Presidential candidates, and the US media decided that they were not worth talking about.
Was he threatening or expressing an opinion?
and what did Clinton know to allow him to threaten that?
Knowing poll results would probably have allowed him to threaten predict that. Many pundits did.
I'm saying Mr. Wilson had no way of knowing that because he never really looked.
What should he have done on his eight day visit that he didn't do? What did the CIA expect him to do on that visit that he didn't do?
I believe the Clintons suggested Mr. Wilson make the trip to Niger.
That is certainly not the idea Novak conveyed in his 14 July 2003 article.
"The CIA's decision to send retired diplomat Joseph C. Wilson to Africa in February 2002 to investigate possible Iraqi purchases of uranium was made routinely at a low level without Director George Tenet's knowledge."
and
"Two senior administration officials told me Wilson's wife suggested sending him to Niger to investigate the Italian report. The CIA says its counter-proliferation officials selected Wilson and asked his wife to contact him."
There is only one person who had the motive and opportunity to reveal that info.
That seems, to me, like a rather huge leap.
As to motive... Anyone who didn't like Ambassador Wilson or his yellowcake report had a motive to reveal the info.
As to opportunity... According to Novak's 1 October 2003 follow-up article, "it was not much of a secret." He writes that, "It was well known around Washington that Wilson's wife worked for the CIA." If it was well-known that she worked for the CIA, then lots of people had the opportunity to reveal the info.
If we take Novak at his word, then, "It was an offhand revelation from this [senior administration] official, who is no partisan gunslinger."
suddenly Novak is writing this article which says that someone from the admin (not the WH) told him that Wilson's wife is an operative for the CIA.
There is only one person who had the motive and opportunity to reveal that info.
I believe it was Hillary or someone of her choosing; ...The motive was still to embarrass the President and PM Blair and discredit the intel.
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you here... It sounds like you are claiming that Hillary (or someone of her choosing) 'outed' Wilson's wife to embarass Bush and Blair and to discredit the intelligence. Either I'm misreading your statements, or else I am just failing to grasp how releasing the info on Wilson's wife accomplished any of those goals.
I know this probably requires tinfoil, but that's okay. I just don't trust Hillary at all.
I don't trust Hillary either, but this requires more tinfoil than I have on my roll.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.