Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ambrose
I haven't read the thread but I suppose it will be a typical animal rights activists dream re breed banning. These lists are usually done by an animal rights groups like the Humane society of the United States. They generally leave the easily frightened to the conclusion that certain "breeds" are excessively dangerous. (breeds is in parentheses because" breed" is usually defined by the whim of the study authors)

What they don't say is that the vast majority of dogs that bite are mutts yet mutts are never listed as dangerous dogs.
142 posted on 01/14/2004 6:21:01 PM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Varda
What they don't say is that the vast majority of dogs that bite are mutts yet mutts are never listed as dangerous dogs

Is that because most dogs are mutts?

149 posted on 01/14/2004 6:23:18 PM PST by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

To: Varda
Aren't the vast majority of dogs mutts, though? One would expect the majority of bites to be mutt-bites. Perhaps those are not newsworthy, or perhaps (as is likely) pitt bulls really do more than their fair share of biting!

I don't know what it would prove to include mutts in the statistics.
152 posted on 01/14/2004 6:24:44 PM PST by Triple Word Score
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson