Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/14/2004 10:08:32 AM PST by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: NorCoGOP

2 posted on 01/14/2004 10:10:50 AM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
We're not bullying anybody. If they want to enter our airspace, they conform. If they don't enter our airspace, there's no obligation.
3 posted on 01/14/2004 10:13:53 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
The U.S. administration has harangued countries into its version of "protecting" the world, one from which we may in fact need protection.

IDIOT! We are protecting ourselves from the world! NEWSFLASH! There are people who want to kill us. They are willing to take large airliners and fly them into buildings. They are willing, given the chance, to disperse chem or bio agents into our cities, even willing to detonate, God forbid, a nuclear bombb. THEY WANT US DEAD! They don't want to be friends. We will never make them happy. THEY WANT US DEAD!!!!!

What part of THEY WANT US DEAD do people not get?

4 posted on 01/14/2004 10:15:06 AM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
And the unpleasant ordeal of 11 hours spent panicking about the possibility of being on board a plane with a man with a gun

I'm sure we can find him a box-cutters-only flight. Try Air France.

I wonder if this pinhead realizes just how idiotic he sounds here - as if being on a plane with an armed federal agent is somehow more of an ordeal than being on a plane being flown into a building.

5 posted on 01/14/2004 10:15:24 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Da Silva told The Guardian that the decision was "absolutely brutal, threatening human rights, violating human dignity, xenophobic and worthy of the worst horrors committed by the Nazis."

Un-friggin' believable.

6 posted on 01/14/2004 10:16:50 AM PST by dirtboy (Howard Dean - all bike and no path)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
It's funny how the cataclysm of 9/11 has reduced the sneering, enlightened left to mere dinosaurs.
7 posted on 01/14/2004 10:20:18 AM PST by zarf (..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I do not, however, find the fingerprint and photograph policy nearly as threatening as the combination of a pressurized cabin and a gun.

Cabin pressurization 101. First forget what you see in the movies. Airline cabins are constantly leaking, this is how you get fresh air in them (I know it doesn't seem like it by the air quality, but it happens). Several air pumps supply fresh pressurized air to the cabin at the rate needed to maintain cabin pressurization. In the case of a bullet hole in the cabin, the pumps simply put more replacement air to the cabin.

Yes it'll be loud and a few people might lose some napkins to the bullet hole, but otherwise the passengers will be safe and pressurized, and the aircraft will continue to fly normally.

Friggin' ignorant fear mongers with an agenda piss me off.

8 posted on 01/14/2004 10:21:37 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I do not, however, find the fingerprint and photograph policy nearly as threatening as the combination of a pressurized cabin and a gun.

The author obviously wrote this before last weekend. Myth Busters showed that a bullet is not going to cause explosive decompression, even if it goes through a window. Another show, on Fox I think, as well as a story in USA Today, told of the very specific information received about the flights indicated.

The author also forgets that he/she is a visitor to this country, with no absolute right to be here. We can apply and always have, as have other countries, conditions for permission to enter our country.

9 posted on 01/14/2004 10:23:54 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

So stay home or take a boat, Miss Rosamund.

10 posted on 01/14/2004 10:24:17 AM PST by Valpal1 (Impeach the 9th! Please!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Da Silva told The Guardian that the decision was "absolutely brutal, threatening human rights, violating human dignity, xenophobic and worthy of the worst horrors committed by the Nazis."

Oh, yeah, just like the Nazis. F*&%##) idiots.

11 posted on 01/14/2004 10:27:11 AM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
"For some, such as Brazilian judge Julier Sebastio da Silva, the decision to photograph and fingerprint visitors is more than an embarrassing and inconvenient experience. Da Silva told The Guardian that the decision was "absolutely brutal, threatening human rights, violating human dignity, xenophobic and worthy of the worst horrors committed by the Nazis."

Fingerprinting people to insure they are not terrorists, for the purpose of enhancing airline safety and saving lives, is equivalent to killing millions of innocent people in concentration camps? This judge is a complete imbecile, and so is Rosamund for thinking the judge is profound.
12 posted on 01/14/2004 10:28:21 AM PST by Steve_Seattle ("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I'm stunned at how many people are ignorant about the rules of airspace. I don't expect everyone to be geniuses, but countries are well within their right to set their airspace requirements as they see fit. ATC can forbid you from entering controlled airspace for any reason they deem fit. In Class A airspace, where probably 95% of jet travel takes place, you can't do anything without permission from center. Why is this kind of thing so hard to fathom?
13 posted on 01/14/2004 10:29:22 AM PST by sirshackleton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Poor baby...a little inconvenience is just not her cup of tea. 9/11 happened and could happen again if we are not vigilant at all times, especially at points of entry like airports. We – America – is at war with war time restrictions to help a nation with blinders like yours to thwart the terrorists.

Air Marshals and armed pilots are de rigueur for many foreign airlines and have been for years. We are at WAR with an unseen enemy who knows people like you will whine and complain none stop, hoping some politician will lift security just a bit for your vote, then the murderous terrorist can get next to you undetected and blow you and those around you up!

Rosamund de Sybel...sounds a little French or maybe Spanish...I could be wrong, maybe likes turbans.............

14 posted on 01/14/2004 10:32:30 AM PST by yoe (Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest............the Clark mantra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Similarly there have been countless incidents of police officers' guns being used against them on the ground

This thing's full of it! That happens rarely, and when the person is identified as a police officer and after a physical struggle ensues. I am sure these air marshals are instructed to remain anonymous and maintain proper distance in an incident.

16 posted on 01/14/2004 10:36:01 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
Every foreigner entering the country ought to be required to fill out a questionnaire that probes his attitude toward America, islam, socialism, France, etc. I don't know what the cut off line would be, but people like this stupid #$%#$ should clearly be refused entry. They have no business coming here.
18 posted on 01/14/2004 10:39:45 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
If he doesn't like it, he can stay home!

Tia

19 posted on 01/14/2004 10:39:51 AM PST by tiamat ("Just a Bronze-Age Gal, Trapped in a Techno World!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
I wonder if this child realizes that another terrorist crash and mass death will change America, and cause a massive collapse of most of the airline industry in America? Probably not.

Besides, some of us have a game simulator at home where there is a hostage situation and you're a marshall on a plane, and have to "plink" the baddies. It's quite a challenge.

21 posted on 01/14/2004 10:45:07 AM PST by Maigrey (Cows: The perfect Animal. Eat their meat, boil their bones for Soup, and Wear their Skin for Clothes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
He goes on to state his feeling "panicky" for the 11 hour flight!

Which is it unneeded or needed security?

He does not consider that the saftey is not only for the passengers but for people on the ground.

Entering an aircraft is like entering a resaturant.

If you don't like the way your treated... dont go back!
23 posted on 01/14/2004 10:48:29 AM PST by Kay Soze (“The Bush immigration plan is heavily dependent on enforcement agencies we don't have”- WFBuckley)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
The unilateralist U.S. administration is once again exporting its policies and deciding how the world is to be policed.

Don't want to be rude however I find this offending and selfish and against us. We have no other choice. We have to protect our self after all we do not go and put suicide people on airplanes and try to kill innocent people. This person should appreciate security precaution being taken by our government.

24 posted on 01/14/2004 10:48:51 AM PST by brazucausa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NorCoGOP
The only problem I see with this is demanding that foreign air carriers place sky marshals aboard, while not placing them on our domestic flights....and not pushing for armed pilots.

Hello?

26 posted on 01/14/2004 10:51:02 AM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson