Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Australia: missile pact angers China
The Australian ^ | January 15 2004 | John Kerin and Rebecca Di Girolamo

Posted on 01/14/2004 9:54:32 AM PST by knighthawk

CHINA has condemned Australia's decision to join the US's "son of Star Wars" missile defence project, warning that the move threatens to undermine security in the Asia-Pacific region.

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Canberra said yesterday that Beijing had expressed longstanding opposition to Washington's missile defence plans.

"Our position on this is clear and has been stated many times," the spokesman, Feng Tie, said.

Senior Chinese Foreign Ministry officials have over the past year repeatedly condemned the missile interception system, which it regards as damaging to global non-proliferation efforts.

China also fears the involvement in the system of regional powers such as Japan and Australia could render its own missiles obsolete.

Federal Opposition Leader Mark Latham expressed concern over China's reaction.

"We're very, very concerned and opposed to national missile defence, particularly in the context of adding to missile proliferation in our part of the world," Mr Latham said.

"We don't support son of Star Wars ... We don't support the son and if they get down to a grandson, I would very much doubt if our position would change."

But his position leaves the way open to support the position on theatre defence spelt out by Defence Minister Robert Hill on Tuesday, which commits Australia to fitting a future generation of warships with interceptor missiles known as SM3s to create a protective umbrella over any deployed forces.

This is the position he will take to the Labor Party's national conference in a fortnight.

Treasurer Peter Costello appeared to pour cold water on Senator Hill's enthusiasm for Australian involvement.

Mr Costello said no funds had yet been committed to the program.

Meanwhile, US and Australian officials have begun talks in Sydney on Australia's participation in the more modest theatre-defence form of the shield.

The US's parent national defence program is far more ambitious in its aim to protect the continental US as well as warships on patrol.

John Howard will meet US Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman General Richard Myers in Sydney tomorrow to discuss missile defence as well as the war in Iraq and regional security.


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: australia; china; missiledefence

1 posted on 01/14/2004 9:54:33 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...
Ping
2 posted on 01/14/2004 9:54:59 AM PST by knighthawk (Live today, there is no time to lose, because when tomorrow comes it's all just yesterday's blues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
If it ticks off the ChiCom's, it's probably a good thing to do.
3 posted on 01/14/2004 9:57:20 AM PST by facedown (Armed in the Heartland)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Someone tell shaggy eel that the chinese are coming, the chinese are coming.
4 posted on 01/14/2004 9:57:34 AM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
.

When the Reds complain about a nation being able to DEFEND itself from attack, they reveal their hostile true intention.

BTW, Funny how the Communist position on missile defense mirrors the liberal position on concealed carry: "How dare you be able to protect yourself!'

5 posted on 01/14/2004 10:00:15 AM PST by BenLurkin (Socialism is Slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cynicom; shaggy eel
The Chinese are coming
6 posted on 01/14/2004 10:00:41 AM PST by knighthawk (Live today, there is no time to lose, because when tomorrow comes it's all just yesterday's blues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Our position on this is clear and has been stated many times,"

Yeah, so? Does China think it owns the world? Guess what, a lot of people think they own the world.

7 posted on 01/14/2004 10:03:55 AM PST by RightWhale (How many technological objections will be raised?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
????...Stupid ChiComs. The Bush SDI is Defensive/political....ChiComs missiles are Offensive/political....What are the ChiComs afraid of?...No more technical aid (stolen secrets) from the Clintcrats?

BTW, How much $YAUN$ from the Chicoms has Shrillary collected so far.

8 posted on 01/14/2004 10:06:43 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Let me see if I understand this: China--one of the world's, greatest proliferators--is upset that we and others want to protect ourselves against the weapons they're responsible for exporting to rogue nations. Yeah...that makes sense.
9 posted on 01/14/2004 10:09:08 AM PST by cwb (ç†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk; cynicom; maui_hawaii; Brian Allen; Jeff Head; Travis McGee
,,, [yawn] let's see how they do with Taiwan first. Strategy is the key.
10 posted on 01/14/2004 11:42:10 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
,,, China's #1 trading partner in the Pacific is PNG.
11 posted on 01/14/2004 11:50:58 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
BTTT
12 posted on 01/14/2004 12:39:46 PM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: shaggy eel
Darwin better get started on a welcoming party. hehe
13 posted on 01/14/2004 2:37:02 PM PST by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
,,, you just keep buying all those cheap imports from China to finance it all.
14 posted on 01/14/2004 2:46:09 PM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson