Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Southack
handled *without* raising taxes

Notice I said deficits = deferred taxes not deficits = raised taxes. If you owed me money and I said you did not have to pay me, instead I'll just take your car in payment, would you argue that you got away without paying me?

685 posted on 01/14/2004 9:32:31 PM PST by Nanodik (Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 683 | View Replies ]


To: Nanodik
"Notice I said deficits = deferred taxes not deficits = raised taxes."

So you did. Point taken.

And for the most part you are correct, however, there are *technical* exceptions which, though hardly popular, permit exceptions to your "rule" above (e.g. defaulting on debt, leasing unused federal land, running printing presses, etc.).

Thus deficits do not have to equate to deferred taxes. Those who loaned money to Iraq back in the 1990's are certainly learning that lesson today...

688 posted on 01/14/2004 9:36:40 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 685 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson