To: Dane
And you know that.
I certainly did....but choosing between UN driven Nation Building and NeoCon driven Nation Building is a toss up in my book. IMO, both entities are as morally corrupt and untrustworthy as it gets.....so I'm leaning towards opting for the UN.
246 posted on
01/13/2004 6:03:30 PM PST by
mr.pink
To: mr.pink
I certainly did....but choosing between UN driven Nation Building and NeoCon driven Nation Building is a toss up in my book. IMO, both entities are as morally corrupt and untrustworthy as it gets.....so I'm leaning towards opting for the UN Kofi Annan and Jacques Chirac thank you.
250 posted on
01/13/2004 6:05:05 PM PST by
Dane
To: mr.pink
.....so I'm leaning towards opting for the UN.You make a good point. At least with the UN the cost for these nation-building schemes might be spread out a little more.
To: mr.pink
but choosing between UN driven Nation Building and NeoCon driven Nation Building is a toss up in my book. IMO, both entities are as morally corrupt and untrustworthy as it gets.....so I'm leaning towards opting for the UN. "mr.-pink-turning-red" would be an appropriate new moniker, if you ever get knocked off.
325 posted on
01/13/2004 6:48:00 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson