To: mr.pink
but choosing between UN driven Nation Building and NeoCon driven Nation Building is a toss up in my book. IMO, both entities are as morally corrupt and untrustworthy as it gets.....so I'm leaning towards opting for the UN. "mr.-pink-turning-red" would be an appropriate new moniker, if you ever get knocked off.
325 posted on
01/13/2004 6:48:00 PM PST by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: sinkspur
"mr.-pink-turning-red" would be an appropriate new moniker, if you ever get knocked off.
Is that your best counter?....playing FR name games?...Although I don't always agree with you, I know you bring a lot more to the table than that laziness.
When I see Perle, Gingrich, Bennett, Frum, or Horowitz on the tube, I can't help but realizing that I have absolutely nothing in common with them and I am in fact completely repulsed by them.
As so many of the current leading " neo conservative" spokespeople are merely "fiscal conservatives", one would think they'd actually appreciate using the UN as a means to cut expense of their Nation Building follies.
As I said before on this thread, the return of James Baker is giving me some hope that the Administration is changing for the better.
598 posted on
01/14/2004 5:12:51 AM PST by
mr.pink
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson