Skip to comments.
Conservatives Should Support the President Now and in November Becauseā¦
Jewish World Review, January ^
| January 13, 2004
| Martha Zoller
Posted on 01/13/2004 1:38:02 PM PST by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 721-738 next last
To: Eris
FR has some of the smartest, funniest, insightful, and politically aware people in the country. The discourse here is like nothing you would find on liberal board. Bush's plan is just that, a plan! Its not a law. It is to be debated and then sent to the legislature. Im surprised so many posters are ignoring this fact! It can be stopped without allowing Dean in. C'mon people! I dont like this plan, either. Nor do I like that Kennedy Education foolishness. But politics are about compromise. A true liberal or conservative has to make too many deals to attain the leadership positions in this country. Thats just the way it is. Like Bill Clinton was forced to the center, so has Bush. And before you start with the Constitution party or the Libertatrians, rememebr that they too, will have to compromise. There is no such thing as a true blue conservative in the oval office; they have to make too many deals to get there. Im not willing to let Dean or Clark, or worse, Hillary in over this..
181
posted on
01/13/2004 5:37:27 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
To: ShadowDancer
You do nothing but continue to bury your head in the sand.I see. Because I don't agree with you, I have my head buried in the sand?
The worst of it is, and you can't seem to see it, is that you are exactly, exactly the type of woman you used to demonize during Clinton's presidency.
Well, since you've only been here since December 10, 2002, how on earth would you know that? Retread?
182
posted on
01/13/2004 5:37:30 PM PST
by
Howlin
(WARNING: If you post to me, Tard and Buttie Fred are gonna copy & paste it to LP!!!!!!!)
To: Dane
He never had a majority in the House.
So RR never had a majority in the branch where spending bills originate?...and if I remember correctly he had a senate for maybe half of his eight years.
That makes a bit of a difference in governing and spending, don't you think?
And please, don't start talking about Judges as Hillary is thoroughly kickin' Bush's butt up and down Constitution Avenue in that department.
183
posted on
01/13/2004 5:39:01 PM PST
by
mr.pink
To: quidnunc
Yada, yada, yada.
You will see the difference in the 2004 vote when we DO stay home or vote 3rd party.
184
posted on
01/13/2004 5:39:29 PM PST
by
Badray
To: Dane
Bush hasn't signed a tax increase like Reagan did. And Reagan never signed a piece of anti-abortion legislation.And by the way, I would take a tax increase for the military anyday. And only then. And, when was Reagan given an abortion bill to sign one way or the other?
To: sinkspur
Who did Bush and the RNC turn to when Gore and the Rats tried to hijack the Presidency?
Thousands, perhaps millions of die-hard conservatives and grass-roots Republican supporters across the country took valuable time off away from family and worked our butts off to support Bush against the Florida recount fraud.
Sinkspur, please don't paint those who criticize Bush as "Bush bashers" or "third-party whiners." We like Bush because he's a decent man and a strong wartime leader. If he'd just exert the same principles in his domestic policies there wouldn't be any of this beef here on FR. Get a clue!
To: N3WBI3
I will not be used the same way the Democratic party uses African Americans. Excellent point! Maybe we should start referring to the Bushbots and Limbots as 'house conservatives'.
187
posted on
01/13/2004 5:41:09 PM PST
by
Nanodik
(Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
Comment #188 Removed by Moderator
To: EagleMamaMT
Vote Dubya!
Because having a middle class lifestyle is SO 20th century!
189
posted on
01/13/2004 5:42:11 PM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
Comment #190 Removed by Moderator
To: cardinal4
He has a Republican House and Senate.
No more excuses.
191
posted on
01/13/2004 5:42:44 PM PST
by
Eris
To: TheFrog
Amendments to the Social Security Act designed to secure the program for several decades. I.e a hike in the Social Security Tax.
U.S. forces bombed Syrian targets in Lebanon - We haven't heard from them recently now have we!
And he cut and run after the Marine barracks bombing in 83. Also I guess you mean not hearing from them is because they are to busy in hiding saddam's WMD's.
Like I said I respect Reagan and think he was a great President but I also know that he had to deal with the politics of his day, just like Bush has to. I cut Reagan some slack, you guys would have a heart attack if you cut Bush any slack. Instead you all would rather help the demos.
192
posted on
01/13/2004 5:42:57 PM PST
by
Dane
To: Southern Federalist; ChadGore
The static we're hearing is from the Death-Before-Electability wingnuts.
They and their ilk kept the California GOP wandering in the electoral wilderness for years.
193
posted on
01/13/2004 5:43:27 PM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: Howlin
Well, since you've only been here since December 10, 2002, how on earth would you know that? God, don't embarrass yourself.
You have become the Bush version of the Clinton swooning soccer mom, plus years of course. Why? Why in God's name can't you admit when he's wrong?
To: Eris
He has a Republican House and Senate A Senate basically split down the middle.
No more knee jerk rants.
195
posted on
01/13/2004 5:44:12 PM PST
by
Dane
To: Nanodik
Maybe we should start referring to the Bushbots and Limbots as 'house conservatives'. And maybe we should refer to the recent influx of Bush bashers as "liberals"
196
posted on
01/13/2004 5:44:18 PM PST
by
Flyer
(Happy Birthday Houston Area Texans!)
To: quidnunc
The far-left lunatic fringe vote against Bush isn't going to amount to a pinch of sCENSOREDt. You are correct. It is the far-right vote that will do him in.
197
posted on
01/13/2004 5:44:20 PM PST
by
Nanodik
(Libertarian, Ex-Canadian)
To: The Old Hoosier
Conservatives Should Support the President Now and in November Because
I'm still waiting for a reason.
Me too
198
posted on
01/13/2004 5:44:25 PM PST
by
Leatherneck_MT
(Good night Chesty, wherever you may be.)
To: Sofa King
Way over the line, knock it off.
To: KantianBurke
LOL.
Better yet, to quote one of the Kool-Aid drinkers. (Soon to be Tampico drinkers)
Vote Bush because having a middle class is too hard.
200
posted on
01/13/2004 5:45:08 PM PST
by
riri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180, 181-200, 201-220 ... 721-738 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson