To: HiTech RedNeck
Were you aware that most "drunk drivers" (by the technical legal definition) are not actually drunk enough to cause serious impairment under most traffic conditions?Where do you get your information from? Do you have any facts whatsoever to back that statement up, or is it just your personal opinion? Perhaps you should spend some time talking to an emergency room MD or nurse. There are a few here at FR.
28 posted on
01/13/2004 10:44:32 AM PST by
Hodar
(With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
To: Hodar
Those who end up in ERs are commonly high as a kite.
To: Hodar
Really, someone who is unaware (or professes to be unaware) of the move to force states to adopt a 0.08 blood alcohol standard in place of standards based on actual medical research (indicating that significant impairment starts at 0.12-0.15) is in no position to comment on the subject.
39 posted on
01/13/2004 11:06:33 AM PST by
steve-b
To: Hodar
Where do you get your information from? Do you have any facts whatsoever to back that statement up, or is it just your personal opinion? Perhaps you should spend some time talking to an emergency room MD or nurse. There are a few here at FR. Current DUI laws are a scam. They fill "rehab" with people who are not alcoholics. Our taxes pay for that. They jack up insurance rates. They employ more Barney Fifes to man checkpoints and pull overtime. They don't catch the blind drunks that actually kill people. Those people are on the road due to corrupt judges and fixer lawyers. 0.08BAC doesn't catch those criminals either.
68 posted on
01/13/2004 1:59:27 PM PST by
eno_
(Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson