A key piece of Clinton's (and Clark's) Kosovo genocide evidence is crumbling.
This is a fascinating bit. I can see that it's being shaped to undermine the USA Today, which is one paper vehemently opposed by the single party state party (the "Democrats"). The NY Times meanwhile pushed (-es?) story after story with lies about global warming, and also had their own little Jason running around lying in person and in print.
The Kosovo intervention was another "wag the dog" operation.
It obviously didn't lead toward better ties with Moslems. Our "ally" Greece backed Serbia, while helpful Turkey elected Erdogan et al, and our "allies" in Europe again gave the cold shoulder to Turkish membership in the EU despite the
backing of its membership by both Greece and the nonmember US.
The reprehensible Noam Chomsky is another vehement critic of the Kosovo intervention, but I wouldn't say his position is the same as most folks here who opposed it.
One thing the US intervention has done is given Europe a glimpse of what things would be like if we were not around. But look at the election results in France and Germany since we helped stop a major war on European soil. Talk about ingratitude.
Clinton's lame excuse was, "we had to do something." I guess arranging humanitarian aid (such as an airlift of tents, blankets, food, and water, using the US military) wasn't as good as bombing the crap out of the very people he said he wanted to help.