Skip to comments.
New Jersey Tells of Progress in Developing a `Smart Gun'
The New York Times ^
| January 7, 2004
| RONALD SMOTHERS
Posted on 01/13/2004 5:50:38 AM PST by Gritty
NEWARK, Jan. 6 State researchers on Tuesday unveiled their work so far on developing a childproof "smart gun," while members of the state's Congressional delegation said they would seek federal research grants to help advance the technology, which is intended to revolutionize gun safety.
(Snip)
... the current model of the handgun they have developed has 16 sensors built into the handle, which holds not a bullet clip, but electronics. The automatic handgun that they are developing uses electronically fired ammunition that is stored in the weapon's barrel rather than in the handle.
(Snip)
One key feature of the technology is that once a grip pattern is programmed into the battery-operated weapon, it activates the handgun only for the three-tenths of a second it takes to pull the trigger. Before and after that, the gun will not fire. Mr. Recce pointed out that other smart-gun technology that uses an owner's fingerprint actually turns the weapon on for up to three minutes when the print registers, thereby allowing anyone to fire it in that time period before it automatically turns off.
(Snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News
KEYWORDS: bang; banglist; smartgun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Excerpted, as this is a NYSlimes article. Make sure you read the entire article, as there is more information than in a couple of related articles. It can also be accessed from
HERE
1
posted on
01/13/2004 5:50:38 AM PST
by
Gritty
To: Gritty
it activates the handgun only for the three-tenths of a second it takes to pull the trigger.Not good enough. Will require a voice recording by the Surgeon General about the danger of guns before firing.
To: Gritty
That state has become about as worthless as it can get. Well, at least they still grow decent tomatoes.
To: Gritty
which holds not a bullet clipWhat the hell is a "bullet clip"? lol...dumba$$es.... it activates the handgun only for the three-tenths of a second it takes to pull the trigger.
"Hello...OnStar? I need you to activate my gun for me, someone's breaking into my house!"
(automated attendant) "Please hold...for our next available operator. Your call is very important to us..."
4
posted on
01/13/2004 5:59:06 AM PST
by
ItsOurTimeNow
("By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!")
To: Gritty
5
posted on
01/13/2004 6:03:17 AM PST
by
B4Ranch
(Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
To: B4Ranch
Smart gun, dumb state.
Now, if you'll excuse me I have to get into my transporter & get to work.
6
posted on
01/13/2004 6:10:14 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: Gritty
Now, if only they could develope safer bullets.
7
posted on
01/13/2004 6:12:37 AM PST
by
Piquaboy
To: Gritty
Hey, this is a Metalstorm firearm!
8
posted on
01/13/2004 6:15:11 AM PST
by
Little Ray
(Why settle for a Lesser Evil? Cthuhlu for President!)
To: Gritty
They might develop it but only an idiot would buy it!THE MORE TECH,THE MORE TO GO WRONG!This is a (pc)gun and will only drive up costs.
To: Gritty
Let them issue smart guns to cops, if they're so wonderful. We'll see what the cops have to say about 'em.
10
posted on
01/13/2004 6:34:16 AM PST
by
Indrid Cold
(He thrusts his fists against the posts and still insists he sees the ghosts.)
To: Gritty
If there's any state that need a "smart gun" law, it's New Jersey. I saw some news clips last night of drivers on the New Jersey Turnpike yesterday -- the first day they opened the new "Express EZ-Pass" lanes. I swear, the people of this state are dumber than bags of rocks. Motorists without EZ-Pass tags coming to a complete stop in the 55-mph lanes, and backing up to change to a cash toll lane.
11
posted on
01/13/2004 7:01:31 AM PST
by
Alberta's Child
(Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
To: Gritty
How will smart guns defend us aginst dumb people?
12
posted on
01/13/2004 7:02:25 AM PST
by
Only1choice____Freedom
(If everything you experienced, believed, lived was a lie, would you want to know the truth?)
To: Indrid Cold
Let them issue smart guns to cops, if they're so wonderful.They know what a turkey this law is and what they are trying to do with it.
The NJ Law specifically exempts the police from having to use these "smart" guns. You don't think they are stupid enough to have their lives depend on these gadgets, do you?
13
posted on
01/13/2004 7:15:34 AM PST
by
Gritty
("They sow the wind and reap the whirlwind"-Hosea 8)
To: Indrid Cold
Exactly. I'll consider buying one of these the day the presidential security detail is exclusively armed with them.
Until then it is a customized Colt 1911 that will ride behind my hip.
14
posted on
01/13/2004 7:22:22 AM PST
by
IGOTMINE
(All we are saying... is give guns a chance!)
To: Indrid Cold
"...Mr. Recce added that trials with the weapon so far at Picatinny Arsenal had shown that in live firing, the weapon, once programmed for a particular user, was not affected by sweat on the user's hands, the user's stress level, movement or gloves..."
How about if you're having a bad arthritis day? Or if you lost a finger? Or if you're wife needed to use it? Oh, hell, the list just goes on and on. I say we donate them to Al-Quaida (how the hell do you spell that, anyway?) and the PLO, batteries not included.
15
posted on
01/13/2004 7:23:07 AM PST
by
jim35
To: Indrid Cold; Gritty
The key to the worth of "smart guns" and the law that mandates them is the fact that the police are exempt. That flushes the worth of the whole concept down the toilet - where it belongs.
The project is being pursued for one reason, and one reason only: as soon as a workable "smart gun" is developed, no NJ civilian will be able to buy a "dumb gun"...i.e. there will effectively be handgun prohibition. I'd bet that any smart gun produced for public consumption will cost several thousand dollars and be riddled with reliability problems, and that supplies will be very limited due to "production problems."
To: *bang_list
Bang
To: dbwz
ping
18
posted on
01/13/2004 8:20:42 AM PST
by
basil
To: Ancesthntr
The project is being pursued for one reason, and one reason only: as soon as a workable "smart gun" is developed, no NJ civilian will be able to buy a "dumb gun"...It's even "funnier" than that.
All they need to implement the law is for ONE "production model" to reach the shelves in any state and the law takes effect. It has absolutely nothing to do with the contraption working or even being sold. Just "delivered".
This merely is a surrepticious way to permanently ban handguns for "civilians" in NJ. Then, this "model" law will head out to the other hopelessly Liberal states for implementation.
19
posted on
01/13/2004 9:48:00 AM PST
by
Gritty
("It's the blue states who constantly send lawyers to the red states to bother everyone-Ann Coulter)
To: Gritty
maybe i don't want to pull the trigger that soon after i pick it up... perhaps i'd like to aim at my target instead of shooting from the hip...
anyone who buys this will need a 100% reliable cell phone to call 911... there will be more dead zones because of the smart gun technology...
teeman8r
20
posted on
01/13/2004 9:52:46 AM PST
by
teeman8r
(i've got shot waiting on my smart gun... and bullet forwarding...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson