Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass Immigration Said 'Swamping' U.S. Cities
NewsMax ^ | 12 Jan, 2004

Posted on 01/12/2004 7:33:52 PM PST by Happy2BMe

Mass Immigration Said 'Swamping' U.S. Cities

Jon E. Dougherty
Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2004
Mass immigration, most of it coming from south of the border, is "swamping" the United States, with six large U.S. cities now consisting mostly of foreign-born inhabitants, a new report warns.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), a Washington, D.C.-based group advocating tighter immigration restrictions, says 1.1 million immigrants will enter the U.S. this year alone. In its new report, FAIR says the immigrant population nearly doubled from 19.8 million in 1990 to 31.1 million a decade later.

"America's immigration policies have launched us into a risky experiment never tried by a modern day country," said Dan Stein, FAIR's executive director, in reference to the new numbers. "This demographic change is unlike anything this country has ever experienced, and is unprecedented in modern times."

FAIR says six large U.S. cities over 100,000 – Hialeah and Miami, Fla., along with Glendale, Santa Ana, Daly City and El Monte, Calif. – had foreign-born populations of more than 50 percent. The immigrant population constituted 41-50 percent of the total in four others: Los Angeles, East Los Angeles, and Garden Grove, Calif., along with Elizabeth, New Jersey.

Mexico accounted for about 9.2 million immigrants, or 30 percent of the total foreign-born population in the U.S., according to the Census Bureau's 2000 report, making it the leading country of birth. Next were China and the Philippines, with 1.5 million and 1.4 million respectively. They are followed by India, Vietnam, Cuba, South Korea, Canada, El Salvador and Germany.

In 2000, more than half the foreign born population lived in three states: California, New York and Texas, the Census Bureau found. The FAIR report said immigration was the greatest in the South, which saw its foreign born population grow by 90 percent, followed by 65 percent in the Midwest.

FAIR says the foreign-born population in the U.S. will swell to 45 million by 2010 if current immigration levels continue, "making this decade's wave of immigration the largest in U.S. history," the report said, adding California's foreign-born population alone is expected to swell to 12 million by decade's end.

Currently, the U.S. population is estimated at 291 million people, according to Census Bureau figures.

Though not all immigration is unhealthy for the country, FAIR says many regions of the U.S. are already struggling economically to provide basic services for people. Adding more numbers will simply make it more difficult – and expensive – to offer them, and that could lead to other troubles, the group claimed.

"What remains to be seen is if this country has the capacity to accommodate, and assimilate, an unending wave of mass immigration ¯ because failure to do so will result in a balkanized, fragmented, strife-torn and dysfunctional America," Stein said.

New Immigrant Initiatives

A number of surveys have shown a majority of Americans at odds with lawmakers who support high levels of immigration. Still, there are new immigrant-friendly initiatives being introduced and considered by Congress and the Bush administration.

For the first time since before the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks, the administration has hinted it is considering a new work-related legalization program for millions of aliens currently residing in the U.S.

A week ago in Miami, Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge told an audience the U.S. will have to "come to grips" with such an initiative, if for nothing else because of the sheer number of illegal aliens who here now or planning to come in the future.

"The bottom line is, as a country we have to come to grips with the presence of 8 to 12 million illegals, afford them some kind of legal status some way, but also as a country decide what our immigration policy is and then enforce it," Ridge said.

Legislatively, the Senate Judiciary Committee voted 16-3 in October to approve the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act of 2003, which would provide college opportunities for U.S.-born children of illegal aliens residing in the country – a vote hailed by immigrant and Latino support groups.

"The future of thousands of Hispanic children depends on the passage of this bill," said a statement by the National Council of La Raza, the nation's largest Hispanic civil rights group.

In clarifying Ridge's statement to reporters a few days later, President Bush said he has opposed, and continues to oppose, any "blanket amnesty" for illegal aliens. But, he echoed the Homeland Security chief's support for a work-related legalization plan.

"We need to have an immigration policy that helps match any willing employer with any willing employee," Bush told reporters Dec. 15. "It makes sense that that policy go forward. And we're in the process of working that through now so I can make a recommendation to the Congress."

Bush will travel to the Summit of the Americas in Monterrey, Mexico, next month, where he will likely discuss the issue with other regional leaders.

Some lawmakers, however, call such work-related plans little more than an amnesty program, and are opposed them on those grounds. Instead, they are pushing for stricter overall enforcement of existing immigration laws as well as a different approach to creating the so-called "guest worker" programs.

Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., head of the House Immigration Reform Caucus, says border legislation he introduced earlier this year aims to plug "gaping holes in both America’s porous borders and its dysfunctional guest worker programs."

Reform groups like FAIR maintain the first issue Washington should address is continued record-high immigration.

"Mass immigration has nothing whatsoever to do with the economic and social well-being of the United States or the American people," Stein said. "Immigration is entirely about the interests of the immigrants themselves, special interest ethnic groups, and business interests that want unlimited numbers of low-wage workers."


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: aliens; demographics; immigration; oas; swamp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: Happy2BMe
Shut up and support this wonderful president!!
22 posted on 01/12/2004 8:21:23 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (What is the point of fighting in Iraq if we surrender to Vicente?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jolie560
The problem is most new (illegal) immigrants don't want to meld, be it language or culture-wise. In other words, they don't aspire to become Americans. They want to set up their own culture here, live off of our social programs and all that can be gained from our, we the taxpayers, money.

Earlier, legal immigrants (my ancestors not so long ago) were eager to learn English, become an American citizen and become part of the great melting pot. Sad to say, but from my own personal experience, that is not the case today.
23 posted on 01/12/2004 8:22:30 PM PST by mplsconservative (I'm a South Dakota native, and darned ashamed of it, well, just the Tommy Daschle part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Paul McCartney was my favorite Beatle.

"Blackbird" is a beautiful song.

We really need to take the broken wings around here and learn to fly.

24 posted on 01/12/2004 8:23:24 PM PST by Happy2BMe (Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
Immigrants are required to pay state and federal taxes on wages earned in the US at the same rates as US citizens.

Contrast that with products made in the US which are sold overseas. State governments collect no sales tax from products exported to, and sold in, Europe, the far East, etc. (Note to self: double check if that's true) even though the state absorbs "the environmental stress" of producing those goods.

If you're thinking about public finance, free trade in the labor market looks like a win on the revenue side compared to free trade in goods.
25 posted on 01/12/2004 8:23:52 PM PST by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: mplsconservative
"The problem is most new (illegal) immigrants don't want to meld, be it language or culture-wise."

So if they dressed like you, talked like you, listened to the same kind of music as you, liked the same kinds of food as you, etc etc they'd be OK.

But they don't, so they're not?
27 posted on 01/12/2004 8:26:06 PM PST by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
[, I'm inclined to think immigration restrictions are just another example of protectionism]

You are correct, and if you have followed the free trade debate you will have noticed that one of the major objection to free trade is that it depresses American wages.

28 posted on 01/12/2004 8:26:44 PM PST by jpsb (")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
~ Take the FReeper Immigration Reform Poll ~

29 posted on 01/12/2004 8:27:42 PM PST by Happy2BMe (Liberty does not tolerate lawlessness and a borderless nation will not prevail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TomInNJ
And our president couldn't wait to kiss their fat butts.
30 posted on 01/12/2004 8:28:11 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (What is the point of fighting in Iraq if we surrender to Vicente?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jolie560
Bring em on--the more the better.

Do you ever miss Calcutta?

31 posted on 01/12/2004 8:28:40 PM PST by dagnabbit (Tell Bush where to put his Amnesty and Global Labor Pool for American Jobs - Tancredo in the primary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Send them back.

We have more than enough people, thank you.
32 posted on 01/12/2004 8:30:22 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative
There are a lot of English speaking people in Kenya. Maybe we should allow free movement of labor between Kenya and the US?

Or allow free movement of labor provided immigrants pass an English competency exam that 50% of Americans could pass?

I don't know if any of that is what you had in mind. I'm just trying to brainstorm some possibilities, letting you tell me what would be OK and wouldn't. That way I can work backwards from failed solutions and try to pinpoint the exact problem.
33 posted on 01/12/2004 8:30:30 PM PST by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Polls don't matter; the elite have spoken.
34 posted on 01/12/2004 8:31:06 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (What is the point of fighting in Iraq if we surrender to Vicente?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jolie560
Send them back.

We are overcrowded.
35 posted on 01/12/2004 8:31:44 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Age of Reason
"Send them back. We have more than enough people, thank you"

That's not what the business lobby is saying. Shouldn't we pursue a pro-business agenda?
36 posted on 01/12/2004 8:31:52 PM PST by ConsistentLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jolie560
We are an immigrant nation . . . .

We used to be a slavery nation, too.

But times change.

37 posted on 01/12/2004 8:33:24 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
ping
38 posted on 01/12/2004 8:34:02 PM PST by Pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConsistentLibertarian
Shouldn't we pursue a pro-business agenda?

We should pursue a freedom agenda, first.

39 posted on 01/12/2004 8:34:14 PM PST by Age of Reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TomInNJ
The boundless audacity!!! They're doing US a favor? Who do they think they're kidding?

Well, let's return the favor, empty our prisons, and send them to Mexico City.
40 posted on 01/12/2004 8:34:25 PM PST by DLfromthedesert (What is the point of fighting in Iraq if we surrender to Vicente?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson