Skip to comments.
Fox Accepts Invitation To Bush Ranch
The Guardian (UK) ^
| 1-13-2004
| Eloy O. Aguilar
Posted on 01/12/2004 5:41:08 PM PST by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
1
posted on
01/12/2004 5:41:08 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
Brazen and disgusting, treason at 11.
To: blam
"But when Bush declined to halt the 2002 execution of a Mexican man accused of killing a police office, Fox protested by canceling a planned trip to Texas."
Why was it his uncle?
3
posted on
01/12/2004 5:43:57 PM PST
by
observer5
To: blam
He can sit in the same chair the Saudi did when the lambasted my nation for taking on terrorism.
Fox can now lambaste W on not taking more of money to help Fox stay in office.
Precedent set is that W will not say a word.
4
posted on
01/12/2004 5:44:03 PM PST
by
Kay Soze
(“The Bush immigration plan is heavily dependent on enforcement agencies we don't have”- WFBuckley)
To: blam
Maybe Bush 41 can have over too while he's up there, give him a trophy or something like he did Ted Kennedy.
5
posted on
01/12/2004 5:45:36 PM PST
by
putupon
(I'm being punished; I have to post "I will not call the President the J name 100 times))
To: blam
Although I don't agree with some of Fox's positions, it is important to remember that although he is not a PRI member, a majority of the Mexican legislative body is. They are prety much anti-American, and often circumvent Fox's intentions. Mexico has a slightly different balance of powers.
To: MissAmericanPie
Brazen and disgusting, treason at 11 JMo your above passage is more like, knee jerk and reactionary, mental breakdown at 11.
7
posted on
01/12/2004 5:53:46 PM PST
by
Dane
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: putupon
Kool Aid PING Oh sheesh a meeting of the Kool-aid fetishists.
9
posted on
01/12/2004 5:56:41 PM PST
by
Dane
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: MissAmericanPie
You are absolutely correct.
To: blam
Fox doesn't realize that W is planning a WORKING visit. Bush is gonna clear out the back forty and needs a hand. Fox might want to pack his chainsaw and leather gloves. There is a lot of brush that needs clearing.
After all, Fox admitted this weekend that his country can't provide Mexicans with a employment and must depend on America to feed his constituents. About time he gets a taste of the kind of labor he thinks his people are best suited for. (Please understand I am not slamming the workers, just the Prez. Shame on him!)
To: Miss Marple
A lot of posters think the two are in some plot together to create a common labor market in North America. In some ways, there is one now, albeit with frictions, and the "plot" is to make it frictionless. The problem is that few believe that Bush is serious about the "temporary" aspect of his immigration program. My suggestion to Bush is to provide some evidence that he is. But maybe that is a bad suggestion, since I suspect Bush's program even if enforced, would be very unpopular. Sometimes, voters can tolerate de facto more easily than de jure. And so it goes.
13
posted on
01/12/2004 5:59:57 PM PST
by
Torie
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: blam
Bush slams down beers with his drinking amigo while America goes to ruin under the weight of illegals.
To: Dane
Illegal Alien Killed This Little GirlClick here and here and here for more victims of cheap lettuce.
16
posted on
01/12/2004 6:00:34 PM PST
by
putupon
(I'm being punished; I have to post "I will not call the President the J name 100 times))
To: blam
Great now 43 is inviting the leader of the crush the USA border stampede to come on over! < /disgust >
17
posted on
01/12/2004 6:01:11 PM PST
by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: MissAmericanPie; blam
To: myprecious
Shame on Prez Fox.
To: blam
Oooh, does this mean that Fox will be photographed and fingerprinted? Or shall he take the method of entry that so many of his 'people' take into the United States?
I can not understand why we continue to pamper this guy - he's not allowed to remain as President beyond one term. It is not like we're investing in a future with him. Why can't we at least pander to the people who are an investment in the future.
20
posted on
01/12/2004 6:04:43 PM PST
by
kingu
(Remember: Politicians and members of the press are going to read what you write today.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-54 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson