Skip to comments.
"No President has ever done more for human rights than I have."
New York Daily News ^
| 1/12/04
| Lloyd Grove
Posted on 01/12/2004 1:30:57 PM PST by Stone Mountain
W & aides broadcast media hate
He didn't free the slaves.
He didn't rid the world of Hitler.
He didn't even - like his father - preside over the destruction of the Berlin Wall.
Yet George W. Bush tells New Yorker writer Ken Auletta: "No President has ever done more for human rights than I have."
With stunners like that, no wonder he spends so little time with journalists.
The President's eyebrow-raising assertion comes during some Oval Office chitchat after Auletta - writing about the testy relations between the Bush White House and the news media - sits in on an interview with a British newspaper reporter.
In the latest New Yorker, Auletta reports that Bush and his minions have little use for the Fourth Estate.
Political guru Karl Rove claims that the job of journalists is "not necessarily to report the news. It's to get a headline or get a story that will make people pay attention to their magazine, newspaper or television more."
And Chief of Staff Andy Card scoffs: "[The media] don't represent the public any more than other people do. In our democracy, the people who represent the public stood for election."
Card argues that it's not the responsibility of top White House policymakers to provide reporters with facts.
"It's not our job to be sources. The taxpayers don't pay us to leak!" Card tells Auletta. "Our job is not to make your job easy."
Predictably, the reporters who cover Bush aren't happy. The Washington Post's Dana Milbank complains: "My biggest frustration is that this White House has chosen an approach ...to engage us as little as possible." And the New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller grouses: "Too often they treat us with contempt."
Free the White House press corps!
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Diddle E. Squat
I agree with your doubts too. Lloyd Grove (the author of the NY Post piece) is listed there as a "Gossip Columnist". You be the judge...
41
posted on
01/12/2004 2:21:57 PM PST
by
AndrewB
To: Diddle E. Squat
duhh...NY Daily News that is.....
42
posted on
01/12/2004 2:22:49 PM PST
by
AndrewB
To: Ohioan
So you really think the President is going to install a democracy in Iraq? So far, we're going against the majority's wishes of free elections, and insisting that the new leaders are chosen by the parliamentary body (or whatever they call it in Iraq), not by a direct election by the people of Iraq. Wouldn't a democratic vote result in a Shiite Islamic government?
43
posted on
01/12/2004 2:25:45 PM PST
by
CalKat
To: marvlus
So doesn't the freedom of Afghanistan and Iraq count? If you live in those countries, I suppose. Or Mexico. Bush has has somewhat the opposite affect in his own country.
44
posted on
01/12/2004 2:29:28 PM PST
by
GingisK
To: MissAmericanPie
Wow. You'd fit in nicely with the conversation George Soros and Wolf Blitzer are having on CNN right now. You voting for Dean or Clark?
45
posted on
01/12/2004 2:35:25 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: dead
Doh!
46
posted on
01/12/2004 2:40:49 PM PST
by
KarlInOhio
(Plate Teutonics: The theory that Germans are moving the continents.)
To: Liberty Valance
Constitution Party
To: Howlin
Most likely never will hear it. But if he did say it- under what context? Was this an exact quote or one of those . . . quotes that omits key qualifying statements? For example:
"No President has done more for Human Rights, since Carter, than I have?" or:
"No President has done more, on the issue of nuclear proliferation while trying to balance that for Human rights than I have?"
Not far fetched at all. It happens more than you think. For a recent example of this- see the wholesale butchering and misquoting of Cardinal Martino.
48
posted on
01/12/2004 2:47:03 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: CalKat
They certainly didn't hesitate to report O'Neill's comments but trotted out several pundits to support the sour grapes theory.
49
posted on
01/12/2004 3:37:57 PM PST
by
CholeraJoe
(I'm a Veteran. I live in Montana. I own assault weapons. I vote. Any questions?)
To: CholeraJoe
O'Neill reminds me of David Stockman from the Reagan era- a sour grapes opportunist whose "dire predictions" later turned out to be completely wrong.
50
posted on
01/12/2004 5:27:53 PM PST
by
Burkeman1
("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
To: Stone Mountain
Predictably, the reporters who cover Bush aren't happy. The Washington Post's Dana Milbank complains: "My biggest frustration is that this White House has chosen an approach ...to engage us as little as possible." And the New York Times' Elisabeth Bumiller grouses: "Too often they treat us with contempt."Snicker..
51
posted on
01/12/2004 5:29:30 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
To: Diddle E. Squat; Jeff Gannon
was wondering the same thing, harboring the same well-experienced doubts.
I don't take ANYTHING the media says at face value, and even less than that during an election cycle.
52
posted on
01/12/2004 9:41:12 PM PST
by
King Prout
("Islam" is to "Peace" as a Zen Koan is to a binary logical "if-then" statement)
To: Stone Mountain
1-800-SNIVEL ALERT! I only hope and pray the press is dissed by this administration every day. and i hope it's painful! they treat the President with contempt and they expect respect??? bite me.
53
posted on
01/12/2004 9:55:06 PM PST
by
suzyq5558
(WARNING! this tagline does not dial 911..........)
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
To: howlingmadhowie
Newbie, are you?
55
posted on
01/14/2004 4:35:35 AM PST
by
marvlus
To: Steve_Seattle
If the WBTS was fought today (ignoring that GWB being from Texas would likely not be the northern President) it is probable that the northeastern elitists would support that war for any reason out of their hatred for the south, even without slavery or segregation.
To: RWR8189
I believe that just about every President hates the press. What upsets the media the most about President Bush's administration is that they do not go out of the way to kiss thier arse. Remember when President Bush went to Iraq for Thanksgiving? The black reporter onf FNC that covers him was visibly upset when Bush did this. Whether he was upset that he was not in the loop, was not invited to go, or that the administration succeeded in keeping this information secret, I cannot say - but he was upset.
57
posted on
01/14/2004 4:45:18 AM PST
by
7thson
(I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
To: howlingmadhowie
mm, i don't see any more freedom in Afghanistan or iraq now that the us-military has leveled the countries (and in the case of afghanistan, left without clearing up the mess). if anything, the situation seems to be worse regarding the civil rights of the populations. Yea... Those plastic shredders are runnin' full bore since the removal of Saddam. Iraq is in rubbles *snicker* and Afghan women still are in full burkas and getting raped for being out without their men *cough*. <P
58
posted on
01/14/2004 4:53:40 AM PST
by
smith288
(Secret member of the VRWC elite forces)
To: Stone Mountain
W. in effect has said...
Please come into our country illegally. Then through social progarms we'll put you people ahead of the rest of the country. And we'll give you and your folk more political clout then the natives who built and bled for the country.
I would agree, W. has given away more to anybody who wants it, then any other person in history.
59
posted on
01/14/2004 4:53:42 AM PST
by
Vision
(Always Faithful)
To: howlingmadhowie
You strayed off course here... Try typing this in after www. D e m o c r a t i c u n d e r g r o u n d .com - they'll appreciate your liberal drivel much more than we will.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson