Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE RETIRED GENERAL. Tape Shows General Clark Linking Iraq and Al Qaeda.
The New York Times ^ | January 12, 2004 | By EDWARD WYATT

Posted on 01/12/2004 11:36:34 AM PST by .cnI redruM

MANCHESTER, N.H., Jan. 11 — Less than a year before he entered the race for the Democratic nomination for president, Gen. Wesley K. Clark said that he believed there was a connection between the Iraqi government and Al Qaeda.

The statement by General Clark in October 2002 as he endorsed a New Hampshire candidate for Congress is a sign of how the general's position on Iraq seems to have changed over time, though he insists his position has been consistent.

"Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said in 2002. "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to Al Qaeda, that there would be some Al Qaeda there or that Saddam Hussein might even be, you know, discussing gee, I wonder since I don't have any scuds and since the Americans are coming at me, I wonder if I could take advantage of Al Qaeda? How would I do it? Is it worth the risk? What could they do for me?"

At numerous campaign events in the past three months and in a book published last year, General Clark has asserted that there was no evidence linking Iraq and Al Qaeda. He has also accused the Bush administration of executing "a world-class bait-and-switch," by using the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, as an excuse to invade Iraq.

At a town hall meeting here on Jan. 4, for example, General Clark said, "There was no imminent threat from Iraq, nor was Iraq connected with Al Qaeda."

"If Iraq had been there as the base of Al Qaeda to organize and train everybody, then maybe we could have justified the attack on Iraq," he added.

In an interview, General Clark said his more recent remarks were not inconsistent with what he said in 2002. In those remarks, he said, he was trying to explain that based on his knowledge of how the intelligence community works, low-level contacts almost certainly existed between Iraq and Al Qaeda, But, he said, that does not mean that Iraq had anything to do with the Sept. 11 attacks.

The 2002 comments, he said, were based in part on a letter to Senator Bob Graham, Democrat of Florida and chairman of the Intelligence Committee, from George J. Tenet, director of central intelligence, which said that the C.I.A. had credible reporting that Al Qaeda leaders sought contacts in Iraq who could help them acquire weapons of mass destruction. The content of the letter was reported in a front-page article in The New York Times on Oct. 9, 2002, the day that General Clark made the comments at the New Hampshire endorsement.

"I never thought there would be any evidence linking Sept. 11 and Saddam Hussein," General Clark said. "Everything I had learned about Saddam Hussein told me that he would be the last person Al Qaeda would trust or that he would trust them."

"All I was saying is that it would be naïve to say that there weren't any contacts," he said. "But that's a far cry from saying there was any connection between the events of 9/11 and Saddam Hussein."

In his most recent book, "Winning Modern Wars," (Public Affairs, 2003), General Clark states, "No evidence thus far suggests any link between Saddam Hussein and the terrorists of Al Qaeda."

On Thursday, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said that despite his assertions to the United Nations last year, he had no concrete evidence of a link between the terrorist organization and Iraq.

The general's 2002 comments appeared on a home video of the press conference in Nashua at which he endorsed Katrina Swett for New Hampshire's Second Congressional District. A copy of the videotape was made available by a rival presidential candidate's campaign.

General Clark's appearance with Ms. Swett has come up before in the presidential race. He advised her at the time that if she were in Congress, she should vote for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq. Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut used that statement to accuse General Clark of inconsistency on Iraq. General Clark subsequently said that at the time he did not understand exactly what was in the resolution and would have voted against it.

Similarly, on the first day of his campaign, General Clark said that he probably would have voted for the resolution on Iraq. He later said he "bobbled" the question and has asserted that he made clear well before the start of the war his belief that Iraq was not an imminent danger to the United States and, therefore, that an attack was not justified at that time.

General Clark had known Ms. Swett and her husband, Richard N. Swett, a former congressman and ambassador to Denmark, when they lived in Denmark and General Clark lived in Belgium as Supreme Allied Commander of NATO.

In an interview, Ms. Swett, who is a national co-chairwoman of Mr. Lieberman's campaign, said she recalled General Clark as "saying pretty unequivocally" that a link existed between Iraq and Al Qaeda.

Within days of the endorsement, General Clark was reported to be considering a run for the Democratic nomination. He had come to New Hampshire as a guest of George Bruno, a former ambassador to Belize who is now a co-chairman of General Clark's campaign in that state.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2002; 2004; alqaedaandiraq; barracksemperor; clark2004; flipflop; weasleyclark; whataweasel
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Yep. He's just as pathetic as Hatred-Powered Howard.
1 posted on 01/12/2004 11:36:36 AM PST by .cnI redruM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
"Certainly there's a connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda," he said in 2002. "It doesn't surprise me at all that they would be talking to Al Qaeda...."

Gee, I guess Clark use to watch too much Fox news....

2 posted on 01/12/2004 11:39:41 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
I used to think that Dean was unbeatable for the title of "Most Beatable Dem" but now I'm thinking Clark might just be better.

What better way to demoralize the Dem base than for the Bush team to dig up and play all Clark's flip flops, followed up by tapes of him praising Bush and his team?

Whoever it is, the Bush team is going to go all sorts of Liza on their wimpy David Gest ass.

3 posted on 01/12/2004 11:40:31 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
I keep saying Clark is loonier than Dean. Dean's just a dick. Clark is a psycho!
4 posted on 01/12/2004 11:45:02 AM PST by Huck (Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
In an interview, General Clark said his more recent remarks were not inconsistent with what he said in 2002.

How much more Clinton can he be? Were I a dem voter and heard all his quotes before becoming a candidate, I would think the guy was Dick Cheney.

5 posted on 01/12/2004 11:45:37 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
The demos can't keep their disinformative "memes" straight.

Wesley will dodge this one by defelcting to a Saddam-9/11 connection that nobody in the govt proposed.
6 posted on 01/12/2004 11:45:50 AM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dead
Hey, guess what I found on my bookshelf yesterday when I was looking for some PJ O'Rourke?
7 posted on 01/12/2004 11:46:54 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Huck
I'd like to see them fist fight for the nomination.

Although he's a short spoiled brat, my money would still go on Dean. The politically incorrect term "fights like a retard" comes to mind. Furious screaming, kicking and wildly swinging arms - impossible to defend against.

8 posted on 01/12/2004 11:49:03 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Could it be????

It’s been a long time since I plugged that one! Thanks!

9 posted on 01/12/2004 11:51:25 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dead
It sure can. Well-read and autographed.

Could you please throw yourself off some cliff in a funk-inspired angst so it's value will go up?

;^)

10 posted on 01/12/2004 11:53:30 AM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dead
I prefer Dean. He's funnier than Clark.
11 posted on 01/12/2004 11:57:46 AM PST by Huck (Was that offensive? I hope that wasn't offensive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dead
"fights like a retard"

ROTFLMBO. Don't forget the dreaded retard strength that was depicted so well in "Something about Mary".

12 posted on 01/12/2004 12:03:31 PM PST by MattinNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
That's not a bad idea, career-wise!
13 posted on 01/12/2004 12:05:07 PM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: dead
Watch out for that sudden stop at the end....

It didn't do diddly squat for Doug Kenney, though.

14 posted on 01/12/2004 12:06:37 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (© 2003, Ravin' Lunatic since 4/98)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
What a two-faced blooming idiot! Just as loony as the "big O" (O'niel).
15 posted on 01/12/2004 12:07:10 PM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: .cnI redruM
Well, well, well . . the (g)eneral pain in the ar$e Clark has seen the light now that he wants to be president.

How special.

16 posted on 01/12/2004 12:12:46 PM PST by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo
Paul "The Artificial Deal" O'Niell?
17 posted on 01/12/2004 12:15:04 PM PST by .cnI redruM (if this guy wants to insult our president and call him evil, he can just join the Democrat Party ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: dead
I'm still hoping Dean. 1) He's very beatable, and 2) the Clinton's hate him. His nomination would be a "two-fer".
18 posted on 01/12/2004 12:20:28 PM PST by My2Cents (Visual World Peace....Through American Military Superiority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
Right, and he'll hammer away that Saddam didn't constitute an "imminent threat" to the US -- something nobody in the government proposed either.
19 posted on 01/12/2004 12:22:04 PM PST by My2Cents (Visual World Peace....Through American Military Superiority)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Some demos are even recycling "rush to war" and "containment." They're dupes. Those talking points were created and funded by the various OPEC/French/Russia/EU financial interests against removing Saddam and UN sanctions. But the Demos believe the points were some valid, "principled", foreign policy decision.
20 posted on 01/12/2004 12:34:42 PM PST by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson