Posted on 01/12/2004 7:46:07 AM PST by kellynla
If George Bush’s amnesty for between 8 million and 14 million illegal aliens is enacted, you can kiss the old America goodbye.
Consider what the president is saying with his amnesty. He is telling us that he cannot or will not do his constitutional duty to defend the states from invasion. He is saying that he simply cannot or will not protect our borders or enforce our immigration laws. He is saying he will no longer send illegal aliens back.
Not long ago, this would have produced calls for impeachment and cries that, “If Bush won’t enforce our laws, let’s elect a president who will.”
By offering amnesty and residency to millions who broke in line, broke our laws and broke into our country, Bush is not only rewarding wholesale criminality, he proposes to legalize it.
His amnesty will send this message to the world: the candy store is open, and the Americans cannot protect it. Now is the time to bust in.
As there must be billions of people willing to come and work for a fraction of our minimum wage—and exploit our social safety net—the number who could come under the Bush guest-worker program is almost infinite.
Imagine a car wash that employs 40 African-American, Latino, and white working-class folks at $8 an hour each. A new car wash down the street opens up, offering 40 new jobs at $5.15 an hour. No Americans apply. Under Bush’s proposal, that employer would be free to go to Asia, Africa, and Latin America, round up workers, and bring them in.
The new car wash with its foreign workers then drives the old car wash with its American workers out of business. Taxpayers are then forced to subsidize the newly unemployed—and pay for the medical care, food stamps, rent supplements, welfare, and schooling of all the new immigrants and their families, provide legal services when they get in trouble and pay for more cops to police their neighborhoods.
And every child born of a guest worker would, under our 14th Amendment, become an American citizen, automatically entitled to all the benefits of citizenship. Meanwhile, Bush’s amnesty will do nothing to halt the illegal invasion that continues to this hour. If you would know what America’s social, cultural, and fiscal future will look like, take a ride through Los Angeles, capital of Mexifornia.
But why did President Bush pick now to propose as explosive an idea as amnesty, when it seemed he was holding a winning hand on the issues of taxes, national security, the economy, and gay marriages?
One sees here the cynical ploy of “Boy Genius” Karl Rove. With the filing deadlines for the Republican primaries having passed and no GOP opponent, with no Third Party challenger from the Right, and with Dean the likely Democratic nominee, Rove knows conservatives are boxed in. In the old cliché, “The conservatives have nowhere else to go.”
So Rove is executing an “apertura a sinistra,” an opening to the Left, pandering to Hispanics and Mexican President Vicente Fox, to whom Bush is to pay a visit.
But Rove may be too clever for the president’s good. For there is no hard evidence that Hispanics, other than those militants who detest Republicans, are demanding amnesty. And with Bush’s spending on foreign aid soaring, his deficits rising, and the White House refusing to veto a single spending bill, Rove & Co. may have stretched conservative loyalty to the breaking point.
For some conservatives, this amnesty will snap it. They may just get on their hind legs and fight, for huge majorities have repeatedly registered opposition to any amnesty for illegal aliens. How is the president helped by a bloody battle with his political base in an election year?
Half a century ago, Dwight Eisenhower, informed there were a million illegals in the United States, most of them from Mexico, ordered them sent back. The project was called “Operation Wetback.”
Ike was a strong president. But in George W. Bush, we have a leader unwilling to pay the political price of doing his duty and enforcing the immigration laws of his country because he fears the reaction from the media elite and Mexican-Americans.
When it comes to standing up to truly powerful ethnic lobbies—the Hispanic Lobby, the Cuban-American Lobby, the Israeli Lobby—Bush wilts and folds every time. Nor is it a healthy sign for the future of our republic when its president offers an amnesty to law-breakers, rather than doing his painful duty to protect his country from what has now become an unstoppable foreign invasion.
The real threats to America’s survival do not come from the Sunni Triangle. They come from within, and unfortunately we have a president who either does not understand them or will not look them in the face.
OPERATION WETBACK - Handbook of Texas
Operation Wetback - Google Search
despite the fact that every poll shows about eighty per cent of citizens want the borders closed to the invasion, the rulers have no intention of listening to their subjects.
An interesting comment. If true how much more has been done despite the wishes of the electorate and what kind of government do we really have?
Not my choice. They can't stand me. :)
Since the President is expected to uphold and defend the Constitution. Some of us are going to hold him accountable to his oath. I am sorry you do not feel the need to do so.
Fine. I guess its time for the Four Questions:
Explain to me how expanding Medicare to include the non means-tested "Prescription Drugs for Seniors" (a 450 BILLION DOLLAR entitlement) benefits the country.
Explain to me how his refusal to veto even one single bill like "Campaign Finance Reform" is good for the country.
Explain to me how his signing on the dotted line of a bloated Farm Bill and Education Bill benefits the country.
And lastly, Explain to me how bringing in illegal aliens that refuse to assimilate and either want to turn the Southwest into a Mexican state (La Raza, MeCHa) or ship home their $$ benefits the country.
I can think up more questions if you like. Not too hard to do with this President.
DO NOT mistake me as a "one-issue voter."
If they are not willing to do that, they should stay home.
The correct word for what Bush proposed isn't pandering, it's treason. Under his proposal, not only would the act of illegally entering into the country be rewarded, there would be no effort to enforce our laws or defend our borders. And there are no limits at all on the number of new low-wage, Third World immigrants who could come here, driving down the wages of working Americans and creating many more foreign enclaves in our midst. This scheme, if enacted, would have a ruinous impact on America and Americans.
Even if Bush only intended this as a sop to the Hispanic lobby and Big Business, this proposal will move the debate on immigration dramatically to the left and will enhance the chance that the Hispanic lobby and the Cheap Labor lobby will get a similar bill through Congress. Given his speech, Bush could never veto such a bill--even if he had summoned the courage to veto ANY bill prior to this.
Such monumentally poor judgment does not deserve to be rewarded at the ballot box.
But they won't because home is really crappy. So what's to be done about them?
And that is exactly what should be ringing everyone's bell.
It's unfortunate, and very damaging that some continue to put their beltway party, or candidate before country.
The ones that will not adopt American values often bring their crappiness with them.
And that makes my home crappy.
On a cost/benefit analysis, my contention is that deportation wins.
Yes, could be.
I'd support mass deportation and militarization if that's what the Administration proposed...as long as I thought they well understood the worst-case scenario and made it clear to at least the thinking portion of the population (a la the National Security Strategy).
All of them if they successfully curtail immigration and/or result in mass deportations.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.