Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?

CBS ^ | January 11, 2004 | CBS

[jim macomber]

“From the very beginning, there was a conviction, that Saddam Hussein was a bad person and that he needed to go,” says O’Neill, who adds that going after Saddam was topic "A" 10 days after the inauguration - eight months before Sept. 11.

[Capitalist Eric]

I'm not a Bush-basher or Bush-devotee...

I voted for him- not because I think he was the best man for the job, but because he was the best candidate on the ballot.

Now that he's here, I support him as much as I can... But such support doesn't extend to the increased nanny-state spending (the drug bill, etc.), nor do I care for his "let's give all the illegals a visa" stance. To me, such ideas are pure excrement, and I think anybody who espouses such idiotic ideas, is not thinking with a clear mind.

That being said, I still support Bush. Because he's there, he's doing a reasonably good job (except where noted).

But this knucklehead coming out, making such slanted, condescending remarks, demonstrates to me that he's an elitist, and didn't like having his elitist ideas brushed off... He didn't want to be ignored. Which also explains why he wrote the book: aside from the lack of class, it shows that he wants to be fawned over.

He'll get that... from the idiot DIMocrats.

[thesummerwind]

O'Neill is a frothing Bush hater.

What he has done and the way he has chosen to do it to Bush would have left P.O. relatively horizontal in Fort Marcy Park in earlier years. Here's thinking this administration may find more creative ways of dealing with this perfidious man's insolent treachery.