To: robertpaulsen
robertpaulsen wrote:
"I'm accurate -- just not quick on the draw."
______________________________________
You're also not fooling anyone Paulsen..
You support the 'right' of fed/state governments to 'regulate' damn near anything [guns included] to the point of prohibiting possession.
You've written:
"Your elected representatives in Congress concluded that an individual growing, manufacturing, trading, selling, bartering, ... whatever, illegal drugs wholly within that individual's state, has an effect on interstate trafficking (commerce).
Obviously, I agree, as I think most rational people would --- "
Paraphased:
--- Your elected representatives in Congress concluded that an individual manufacturing, trading, selling, bartering, ... whatever, 'illegal' weapons wholly within that individual's state, has an effect on interstate trafficking (commerce).
Obviously, I agree, as I think most rational people would ---
55 posted on
01/10/2004 11:21:32 AM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacher in me.)
To: tpaine
"You support the 'right' of fed/state governments to 'regulate' damn near anything [guns included] to the point of prohibiting possession."Hah! You're just pi$$ed that your precious recreational drugs are illegal. Poor baby.
Tell you what. You find where there's a constitutional "right" to do drugs (as there is to keep and bear arms) and I'll change my position.
Until then, stop mixing the two. I'll state if for you once again. I believe in the individual right to keep and bear arms (arms defined as those carried by the average soldier), including concealed carry.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson