Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: adam_az
If that's the case, why the made up case of WMD? The non-existent imminent threat? Why did it have to be sold?
146 posted on 01/10/2004 8:44:16 AM PST by cory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: cory
In her book Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein´s Unfinished War against America, Dr. Mylroie provided substantial evidence implicating Saddam's involvement in four terrorist attacks: the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing; the 1995 bombing in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, the 1996 attack on the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, and the 1998 bombings of two African embassies.



http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=11647
148 posted on 01/10/2004 8:50:25 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: cory
If that's the case, why the made up case of WMD?

It wasn't made up; every intelligence service in the world said Iraq had WMDs.

149 posted on 01/10/2004 8:50:51 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: cory
If that's the case, why the made up case of WMD? The non-existent imminent threat? Why did it have to be sold?

What makes you think the WMD case was made up? The Iraqis were good at deception. It took months to find Saddam, whose to say what happened to the WMD at this point. We know he had deception ops going on as late as 1998, when the inspectors pulled out. Then he had a few years with no inspections to do... whatever with the rest. Clinton apparently believed he had WMD, as did the Rats. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/983916/posts?page=36#36 "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998 "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...." Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003 Now the Rats claim that Bush "lied" about Saddam having WMD? Gimme a break.
150 posted on 01/10/2004 8:53:41 AM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: cory
The non-existent imminent threat?

SIGH!

Some have said we must not act until the threat is imminent. Since when have terrorists and tyrants announced their intentions, politely putting us on notice before they strike? If this threat is permitted to fully and suddenly emerge, all actions, all words, and all recriminations would come too late. Trusting in the sanity and restraint of Saddam Hussein is not a strategy, and it is not an option.

Bush State of the Union Address, January 28, 2003

153 posted on 01/10/2004 8:56:15 AM PST by eyespysomething (Another American optimist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

To: cory
why the made up case of WMD?

You have no basis for stating Iraq's possession of WMD's was "made up".

The non-existent imminent threat?

President Bush wanted to act *before* they were an imminent threat. Where did you get the erroneous idea that anybody in this administration declared them an imminent threat?

217 posted on 01/10/2004 12:13:55 PM PST by cyncooper ("The evil is in plain sight")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson