1 posted on
01/10/2004 5:13:08 AM PST by
FSPress
To: *bang_list
Kansas CCW info
2 posted on
01/10/2004 5:14:05 AM PST by
FSPress
To: All
|
Do these guys look happy
at the possibility
SHE might someday be their
Commander in Chief? |
Don't
Let
This
Happen!!! |
 |
Support Free Republic!
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com |
|
SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC
Help Keep "Wonder Vermin" out of the White House! |
To: FSPress
I don't think the 2/3 vote will pass on Sebelius' veto. We couldn't even get it passed with Bill Graves as governor. (He vetoed as well)
4 posted on
01/10/2004 5:19:21 AM PST by
Crazieman
To: FSPress
It is always surprising to be reminded that Kansas has no conceal and carry. Kansans seem to be awfully quiet about it, though--so maybe it's just not a big issue with them.
Even though this lady is a democrat, she seems to have a good grasp of the Second Amendment. I wish her well.
5 posted on
01/10/2004 5:31:19 AM PST by
basil
To: FSPress
the second amendment says nothing about having to complete a safety and training course... it does say that the right to carry shall not be infringed....
my only problem with these right to carry democrats is that they will infringe by denying people completion of the course....
jmt teeman
6 posted on
01/10/2004 6:50:54 AM PST by
teeman8r
To: FSPress
"Sebelius, a Democrat, has said she would support a bill limited to allowing retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed guns because "they have the special training and the street smarts to deal with it.""
Translation: Cops are ubermensch
7 posted on
01/10/2004 6:51:53 AM PST by
Monty22
To: FSPress
But this is the year for passage, Ruff said. This is an election year.
The fun thing about this is the dems still haven't noticed the correlation behind supporting gun control and losing elections.
8 posted on
01/10/2004 7:50:36 AM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: FSPress
Jdege's map.
9 posted on
01/10/2004 7:53:34 AM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: FSPress
"Ruff said she had no desire to carry a weapon and was not a member of the NRA. She said her support was based on what she said was the constitutional right to carry a gun and protect oneself."
I wonder when the Supreme court is going to start thinking like Ruff.
11 posted on
01/10/2004 8:23:58 AM PST by
B4Ranch
(Wave your flag, don't waive your rights!)
To: FSPress
Once again I just don't understand why these politicians can't grasp the meaning and context of "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"
13 posted on
01/10/2004 10:01:28 AM PST by
ChefKeith
(NASCAR...everything else is just a game!)
To: FSPress
From a DEMOCRAT? Must be one of the rare Dingell ones still out there.
17 posted on
01/10/2004 5:30:01 PM PST by
Dan from Michigan
("And it's worth the sweat, and it's worth the pain, cause the chance may never come again" -)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson