Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: finnman69
Army officials acknowledged that the 30 mm cannons used by the Apache gunners were far bigger than what was needed to kill the men, but said it is the smallest weapon the Apaches have.

Okay, *which* reporter was stupid enough to actually ask the question which elicited this "acknowledgement"?

I can see it now. "But... isn't it barbaric to kill them with a bigger than necessary weapon? If you're going to kill them, shouldn't you use a weapon that's only as big as absolutely necessary?"

77 posted on 01/09/2004 7:47:16 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: Ichneumon
I can see it now. "But... isn't it barbaric to kill them with a bigger than necessary weapon? If you're going to kill them, shouldn't you use a weapon that's only as big as absolutely necessary?"

We need safer guns and safer bullets . . . 8-)

239 posted on 01/10/2004 5:16:49 AM PST by RansomOttawa (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson