Posted on 01/09/2004 3:49:40 PM PST by jim macomber
"Bush vs Dean makes it plain: a guy who wants to take the war to the terrorists and the states who sponsor, harbour and train them versus a guy who thinks its about, if anything, liaising with Interpol and serving injunctions."
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.co.uk ...
|
|
|
FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
|
It is in the breaking news sidebar! |
As trenchant a summary of the Democrats' electoral problem as I've ever seen.
They believe all of us are their intellectual inferiors. Their's is a toxic "misunderestimation" of the American people.
And it is why they will not only lose in 2004 -- they will get squashed like a bug.
Deservedly so.
The trouble is the unDean is different everywhere you look. In the Granite State, Laura and co. reckon the unDean is Kerry. In Iowa, its Dick Gephardt, the soporific 1970s union throwback. In Arizona, its General Wesley Clark, the pantomime stalking-horse entered by the Clintons. In South Carolina, it seems to be the Revd Al Sharpton, the distinguished race-baiter. And all these states are voting in the next month, which means, no matter how well he does, each unDean could be undone by some other unDean a couple of days later.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.