Skip to comments.
"Explicit statistical evidence of massive ballot tampering in Palm Beach, Fl"
reagan.com ^
| REPOST - 09 November, 2000
| Robert A. Cook, PE
Posted on 01/09/2004 6:31:24 AM PST by yoe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: yoe
A very convincing study!
We need good conservative poll-watchers in every precinct in America in November 2004.
I have an acquaintance in Albequerque, NM, who told me that she voted 3 times in the 2000 election. Her best friend, a dyed-in-the-wool Dem who was working at the polls, was letting all her Dem friends do this.
Fraud was widespread in 2000. We mustn't let it happen in 2004.
41
posted on
01/09/2004 6:19:34 PM PST
by
Palladin
(Proud to be a FReeper!)
To: TaxRelief
Democratic strategy for '04 bump
To: Palladin
And, strategically, notice that Abq. NM was ONE of the few places off-the-border, outside-the-inner-city, outside the northeast-union-vote that voted democratic (blue) for president.
The Taos/Abq region county stands by its lonesome in the middle of the red counties around it in every other state.
Indian/reservation fraud is implied as well.
43
posted on
01/09/2004 6:50:37 PM PST
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: yoe
President Bush was properly elected!Yes, he was, and this article is excellent.
It is well to remember, however, that just over 3 years ago, a cigar-store Indian environmental wacko and a nutty communist got TWO AND A HALF MILLION VOTES more than Bush.
It is proper to start off this election cycle thinking we are 2.5 million votes behind, rather than repeating idle fantasies abot a Bush landslide.
To: yoe
Bump for file
45
posted on
01/09/2004 7:27:19 PM PST
by
Bob Eimiller
(Kennedy..Kerry..Leahy...Pelosi..Kucinich.."Catholics" who Promote Partial Birth Abortion.)
To: So Cal Rocket
Better get to know the crew, zippy.
46
posted on
01/09/2004 7:44:00 PM PST
by
j_tull
(created by God and endowed by Him with certain inalienable rights which no civil authority may usurp)
To: yoe
bump
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
48
posted on
01/09/2004 7:48:46 PM PST
by
getmeouttaPalmBeachCounty_FL
(If you think you are too small to be effective, you have never been in bed with a mosquito.)
To: maica; Freee-dame; onyx; wardaddy; Eaker; Squantos; river rat; patton; Coop
It amazes me to this day that this story never attained significance.
It should have been the Democratic Watergate.
49
posted on
01/10/2004 12:06:23 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
To: Travis McGee; PhiKapMom; Howlin; Tamsey; FairOpinion; South40; gatorbait; woodyinscc; ...
Geeeezus gawd, how did I miss this the first time around?
Bookmarked. Thank you for this particular ping.
*PING*
50
posted on
01/10/2004 12:23:50 AM PST
by
onyx
(Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
To: yoe
Speaking of voter fraud -- let me repeat what I have said on several threads. Nursing homes are prime targets for groups like the "The League of Women Voters".
A letter to Dear Abby shortly after the 2000 elections expressed a former employee's concerns about various groups who make a habit of going into nursing homes and filling out absentee ballots for patients suffering from dementia, patients who have no clue who they are, much less whom they would choose to run the country. And these people are voting for them,
The employee was especially distressed at hearing the women laugh after "voting" for a comatose patient they knew would have voted differently.
I would love to see some FReeper set up some kind of surveillance camera and catch these women in the act.
Considering the population of nursing homes across the country, hundreds of thousands of fraudulent votes could be cast in every major election, with no one the wiser.
51
posted on
01/10/2004 12:46:02 AM PST
by
bjcintennessee
(Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
To: bjcintennessee
Bump to read again when i'm not so sleepy.
I did, however, read one leftist analyst who was using roughly the same data to claim it was Republicn fraud becuase, he reasoned, there would be no reason for so many people to vote Bush or Buchanan in a heavily Democrat precinct.
It must be in the eye of the beholder.
52
posted on
01/10/2004 1:06:12 AM PST
by
Tall_Texan
(Happy 2004 - the year we put Republicanism into overdrive.)
To: yoe
Great post!
Although thoroughly unsurprising (the Democrats perpetrate massive vote fraud - - surprise, surprise), it is always a good idea to get this kind of analysis ON THE RECORD forever. Hopefully it will someday be cited in the obituary for the scumbag Democrat Party.
To: Tall_Texan
I did, however, read one leftist analyst who was using roughly the same data to claim it was Republicn fraud becuase, he reasoned, there would be no reason for so many people to vote Bush or Buchanan in a heavily Democrat precinctWhile I can't imagine republicans doing this, I would condemn such actions on either side. But voter fraud seems to be the democRATS' domain and I would like to see their a$$e$ nailed to the wall.
Speaking of sleepy -- I'm off to bed here as well.
54
posted on
01/10/2004 1:29:19 AM PST
by
bjcintennessee
(Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
To: Robert A. Cook, PE
Excellent and damning analysis. But the writeup *really* needs to be worked over by a good editor. It's currently not nearly concise enough, and it tends to present its points scattershot.
It would also benefit immensely from some well chosen graphs and figures.
To: Travis McGee
It was born with significance; it just never attained noteriaty.
56
posted on
01/10/2004 3:40:45 AM PST
by
patton
(I wish we could all look at the evil of abortion with the pure, honest heart of a child.)
To: Travis McGee
It amazes me to this day that this story never attained significance. It should have been the Democratic Watergate.
There will never be a Democratic "Watergate." Republicans have to realize once and for all that actions are not treated equally when committed or omitted by the two sides.
Consider: President Bush41 kept quiet during the Clinton years; President Clinton STILL inserts into every public appearance the slander that Bush stole the election - and there is no public response to this slur.
To continue to lie and foment resentment is evil. The Dems fight very dirty, and we have to accept that. Newt Gingrich was blind-sided when he attempted to act as Majority Leader, because no one had yet realized how the Dems would behave when they lost the majority.
Now we have had ten years experience with their perfidy. We have to fight smarter.
57
posted on
01/10/2004 5:13:43 AM PST
by
maica
(Laus Deo)
To: ladyinred
then to turn it around and say the victim of their fraud is the one who cheated. But this is always the way to tell what Rats are up to: whatever they accuse the opposition of doing is exactly what they are doing themselves. It's the equivalent of the old sports saying "the best defense is a good offense."
58
posted on
01/10/2004 5:32:01 AM PST
by
Bernard Marx
("It is not socialism but the language of socialism that is dead." David Horowitz)
To: onyx
Check out Al Gore's REVIEW of Cast Away.
59
posted on
01/10/2004 8:38:56 AM PST
by
MeekOneGOP
(Howie Dean in the South !!: http://Richard.Meek.home.comcast.net/IowaRatsLastMealNewDeal.JPG)
To: Ichneumon
I totally agree about the editing workover. I think David Frum (sp?) is writing a book about voter fraud.
60
posted on
01/10/2004 8:45:24 AM PST
by
Travis McGee
(----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson