Skip to comments.
Unusual Looking Martian Rock
NONE
| 1-9-04
| Orion78
Posted on 01/08/2004 10:04:57 PM PST by Orion78
The original image from NASA is HERE
Location of Rock in Question
Close Up
TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: mars; martianrock; mera; rock; spirit; sushi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 521-534 next last
To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Hehe... Are you trying to post a picture of the WTC guy on Mars? If so, you must have missed my version that I posted back at the begining of the thread. I'll repost it for you.
401
posted on
01/18/2004 12:01:42 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
To: Joe Hadenuf
Thanks! =)
402
posted on
01/18/2004 12:02:55 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
To: FireTrack
Great image!
403
posted on
01/18/2004 12:08:55 PM PST
by
Joe Hadenuf
(I failed anger management class, they decided to give me a passing grade anyway)
To: LPM1888
It does look like petrified wood or like others have said, petrified bone. I had a dream the night Spirit landed that the first picture returned showed a stand of petrified tree stumps. I am not saying this means anything, just wanted to share.
I am very pleased that the latest pictures show it is more than just a trick of light and shadow. If it had been, then my thread would have died and disapeared. Nothing like putting tons of effort into a thread that hits triple digit posts only to watch it go down the tubes. =)
404
posted on
01/18/2004 12:17:23 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
To: Joe Hadenuf
Thanks, I sure wish NASA would announce when they're going to enlighten us on all these strange objects we're seeing.
I know they must be way ahead of us on this and the silence tends to make one think that the scientists at NASA are in shock.
To: FireTrack
Oh, I agree. If I was a NASA scientist reading this thread, I would be in shock also.
Good grief, it is a shadow!
406
posted on
01/18/2004 12:35:30 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Orion78
Do not get too "proud" about a thread that keeps going.
Eventually, as the rover explores it's environment, your statements will eventually look rather foolish.
Then, we will hold you accountable for your statements and failure to follow the most basic of scientific principles.
Until then, I have enjoyed the laugh.
407
posted on
01/18/2004 12:42:29 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Hunble
"Good grief, it is a shadow!" Surely you can forgive a little foolish conjecture? If not, perhaps you should find another thread where there are others with little imagination as yourself.
To: Orion78
You have done excellent work with this thread!
It appears that Spirit may have found far more than just signs of water. That's probably why NASA isn't commenting more than they have. They won't say anything until they have triple checked themselves in as many ways as possible. Given the limitations of the Spirit's onboard equipment it's going be extremely interesting to see what can be proven.
Premonitions can be eerie!.
Keep up the great work.
409
posted on
01/18/2004 1:29:37 PM PST
by
LPM1888
(What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
To: Hunble
Ok, why don't you explain how I have not followed the most basic of scientific principles, and also while you are at it, why don't you explain which of my statements will look rather foolish. Or are you afraid to stick your neck out?
410
posted on
01/18/2004 1:33:19 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
To: Hunble
Also, when you get a chance, why don't you point out what is creating this rectangle shaped "shadow"..
411
posted on
01/18/2004 1:35:50 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
To: Orion78
Now Orion78, do I need to insult your intelligence?
What side of the image are the shadows being cast? Left or Right?
That "square hole" is a shadow, and that fact can not be disputed.
What is so unusual about a rocks (notice, most of the Mars rocks are rather sharp and blocky) casting a square shadow?
Why is this image considered unusual?
Curious minds would like to know...
412
posted on
01/18/2004 1:42:30 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Joe Hadenuf
Btw, those are some great images on your profile!
To: Orion78
Square and blocky is what I expected to find on Mars.
What is interesting is the rounded rock to the left of that image. How was that rock rounded?
414
posted on
01/18/2004 1:47:27 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Hunble; Orion78
Orion78 has done great work in posting and enlarging the Spirit pictures and allowing all of us to attempt to analyze the pictures. If you have a different opinion of the analysis then, by all means, post it. But if you are here to just be a disruptive jerk then go jerk somewhere else. So far you haven't impressed anyone with your intelligence or wit, but unless you post an attempt at an analysis your ignorance and intent will be displayed clearly to everyone.
415
posted on
01/18/2004 1:49:33 PM PST
by
LPM1888
(What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
To: Hunble
Have you looked at the images in post #369? If so please explain what is casting the shadow. I await your explanation or apology to Orion78.
416
posted on
01/18/2004 1:55:16 PM PST
by
LPM1888
(What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
To: LPM1888
Sir, I also enjoy and study the images that Orion78 does provide. If anything, I am rather upset that NASA has not done a better job of providing those images to all of us.
Orion78 has an interesting point-of-view, but I have not accepted his interpretations as factual data points for scientific debate.
Sorry, I guess that I have not been programed by ABC/CBS/NBC and CNN on how properly think yet.
417
posted on
01/18/2004 1:59:39 PM PST
by
Hunble
To: Miss Marple
Thank you. I am fascinated as well. Like AppauledAtAppeasementConservat I am a space junkie and I am very interested in geology so when you put the two together... !
I am sure that even if they don't find water or evidence of past water on Mars there is still much we can learn from the rock record. Even finding layers that are created by volcanic ash and dust deposits will tell us many things.
I have always thought that if we could study the geologic time line of Mars, that we would find correlations between Earth and Martian climates. I wouldn't be at all surprised to learn that Mars has gone through "ice ages" at the same time as the Earth. Also, Martian geology combined with Earth and Lunar geology could tell us much about cratering. For example, was the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs just a rogue rock, or was it part of a larger cratering event that effected other bodies in the inner solar system.
Anyway, thank you for the encouraging comments, and I have added you to my Update Ping List.
Orion78
418
posted on
01/18/2004 2:00:56 PM PST
by
Orion78
(Only a slave can work with no right to the product of his effort.)
To: Hunble
Post #369 appears to show that this is not the result of a shadow. The sun is pretty clearly coming from the other direction, yet the same formation is still visible.
FWIW, I don't have the slightest clue what this could be.
419
posted on
01/18/2004 2:03:55 PM PST
by
NittanyLion
(E-A-G-L-E-S - Eagles!)
To: Orion78
From the way the shadows are facing on the other rocks, it could be just a raised surface casting its shadow on itself.
420
posted on
01/18/2004 2:05:10 PM PST
by
man of Yosemite
("When a man decides to do something everyday, that's about when he stops doing it.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 521-534 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson