Skip to comments.
Ready for a laugh? - Global warming could destroy 15-37% species by 2050: Study
Nature Journal ^
| 01-08-2003
| Reprinted in Press Trust India
Posted on 01/08/2004 5:18:46 PM PST by Brian_Baldwin
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: RightOnline
This stupid article was in the NY Times today. My quasi-liberal friend pointed it out to me and said, "See leading scientists predict eradication of up to 30% of all species by 2050". So, I picked up the paper and read the article and then pointed out to him that none of these so called scientists were from any leading scientific instituion recognized for global climate study. There were only 19 of them anyway, not what I would call a consensus in the scientific community but since it was written in the NY Times well then it must be literally translated as if it was gospel. Many other misleading headlines appeared in today's NY times, too. Nothing new here...
To: inspector
The world by 2012:


For a more detailed view click on the continents.
To: Brian_Baldwin
I thought this was a Ted Danson prediction. He said about 10 years ago that in 10 years the oceans would be devoid of life. It seems to me it's smarter to make these predictions far enough out so we will all be dead before thinking people realize how dumb and stupid the original prediction was.
43
posted on
01/08/2004 7:48:34 PM PST
by
stevem
To: nuconvert
I Googled the guy, and he's an ECOLOGIST, but more exactly, a "conservation biologist".
Maroon who wrote the article didn't even get that right lol
To: Brian_Baldwin
Is there a line in Vegas or this happening? I bet that you could get odds of 1000 to 1.
45
posted on
01/08/2004 7:55:44 PM PST
by
glorgau
To: Brian_Baldwin
Evolution BABY! Darwins rule: Survival of the fitest!
To: somemoreequalthanothers
LOL thats funny!
To: Brian_Baldwin
Send Chris Thomas to the Northern latitudes in the summer and let the mosquitoes have at him.
Then he can report back on the "massive" number of species lost.
48
posted on
01/08/2004 8:21:29 PM PST
by
eleni121
(Preempt and Prevent)
To: SubMareener
The world by 2012:
Hey, I clicked on the map for North America and it looks like I'm set up to own waterfront property!
To: Brian_Baldwin
Do the Democrats qualify as a species?
50
posted on
01/08/2004 8:48:28 PM PST
by
Hotdog
To: visualops
he's an ECOLOGIST, but more exactly, a "conservation biologist".
LoL.. Oh sheesh. economist, ecologist, whatever......
I imagine he's none too happy with the writer......
Still, doesn't change my mind about him being a kook.
51
posted on
01/08/2004 9:05:57 PM PST
by
nuconvert
("This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it.")
To: SubMareener
Thanks for the funny link. The author, Scallion, claims his Matrix Institute knows events years in advance of the rest of the world. Too bad he didn't invest in this company when it was founded by this motley crew...
I guess you can't know everything, huh?
To: SwinneySwitch
But you forget the Bush administration's "gutting of environmental protection laws" - the additional toxins that will be dumped into the air and water will cause enough mutations to more than offset the projected losses. See, we're way ahead on this!!!
53
posted on
01/09/2004 12:12:47 PM PST
by
talleyman
(It takes a village to raise an idiot.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson