Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ready for a laugh? - Global warming could destroy 15-37% species by 2050: Study
Nature Journal ^ | 01-08-2003 | Reprinted in Press Trust India

Posted on 01/08/2004 5:18:46 PM PST by Brian_Baldwin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: RightOnline
This stupid article was in the NY Times today. My quasi-liberal friend pointed it out to me and said, "See leading scientists predict eradication of up to 30% of all species by 2050". So, I picked up the paper and read the article and then pointed out to him that none of these so called scientists were from any leading scientific instituion recognized for global climate study. There were only 19 of them anyway, not what I would call a consensus in the scientific community but since it was written in the NY Times well then it must be literally translated as if it was gospel. Many other misleading headlines appeared in today's NY times, too. Nothing new here...
41 posted on 01/08/2004 6:53:24 PM PST by inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: inspector
The world by 2012:


For a more detailed view click on the continents.

42 posted on 01/08/2004 7:45:44 PM PST by SubMareener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
I thought this was a Ted Danson prediction. He said about 10 years ago that in 10 years the oceans would be devoid of life. It seems to me it's smarter to make these predictions far enough out so we will all be dead before thinking people realize how dumb and stupid the original prediction was.
43 posted on 01/08/2004 7:48:34 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I Googled the guy, and he's an ECOLOGIST, but more exactly, a "conservation biologist".
Maroon who wrote the article didn't even get that right lol
44 posted on 01/08/2004 7:52:33 PM PST by visualops
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
Is there a line in Vegas or this happening? I bet that you could get odds of 1000 to 1.
45 posted on 01/08/2004 7:55:44 PM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
Evolution BABY! Darwins rule: Survival of the fitest!
46 posted on 01/08/2004 8:17:00 PM PST by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers
LOL thats funny!
47 posted on 01/08/2004 8:19:09 PM PST by KingNo155
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
Send Chris Thomas to the Northern latitudes in the summer and let the mosquitoes have at him.

Then he can report back on the "massive" number of species lost.

48 posted on 01/08/2004 8:21:29 PM PST by eleni121 (Preempt and Prevent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
The world by 2012:

Hey, I clicked on the map for North America and it looks like I'm set up to own waterfront property!
49 posted on 01/08/2004 8:43:12 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Brian_Baldwin
Do the Democrats qualify as a species?
50 posted on 01/08/2004 8:48:28 PM PST by Hotdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: visualops
he's an ECOLOGIST, but more exactly, a "conservation biologist".

LoL.. Oh sheesh. economist, ecologist, whatever......
I imagine he's none too happy with the writer......
Still, doesn't change my mind about him being a kook.
51 posted on 01/08/2004 9:05:57 PM PST by nuconvert ("This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
Thanks for the funny link. The author, Scallion, claims his Matrix Institute knows events years in advance of the rest of the world. Too bad he didn't invest in this company when it was founded by this motley crew...

I guess you can't know everything, huh?

52 posted on 01/08/2004 9:47:53 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SwinneySwitch
But you forget the Bush administration's "gutting of environmental protection laws" - the additional toxins that will be dumped into the air and water will cause enough mutations to more than offset the projected losses. See, we're way ahead on this!!!
53 posted on 01/09/2004 12:12:47 PM PST by talleyman (It takes a village to raise an idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson