The US taxpayer should not be subsidizing technology that law enforcement agencies will reject. New Jersey has to inflict its loony obsession on the rest of the country.
1 posted on
01/08/2004 3:37:51 PM PST by
neverdem
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
7 |
Maryland |
920.00
|
19
|
48.42
|
334
|
2.75
|
293.00
|
14
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
2 posted on
01/08/2004 3:39:33 PM PST by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: neverdem
Even if you could snap your fingers and invent perfect technlogy - how long would it take to penetrate the marketplace 100% - 80 years? I would look to anti-gunners to insist that all non-smart guns be turned in as soon as the allegedly smart ones hit the market.
3 posted on
01/08/2004 3:40:27 PM PST by
Wally_Kalbacken
(Seldom right, never in doubt!)
To: neverdem
Wouldn't it be better for the person holding the gun to be smart? I never trust any technology to make decisions for me. I trust it only to follow my orders. And with "smart guns," that trust is lost.
That's why I'll never own a "smart gun."
4 posted on
01/08/2004 3:40:46 PM PST by
Prime Choice
(Americans are a spiritual people. We're happy to help members of al Qaeda meet God.)
To: neverdem
Oink Oink
5 posted on
01/08/2004 3:41:59 PM PST by
aomagrat
(IYAOYAS)
To: neverdem
New Jersey has to inflict its loony obsession on the rest of the country. It's part of their incremental objective moving toward a total gun ban. I wonder if the cops would use such a system after they get blasted by quicker bad guys because of delays in the recognition system?
7 posted on
01/08/2004 3:46:35 PM PST by
demlosers
(Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
To: *bang_list
Bang
To: neverdem; All
9 posted on
01/08/2004 3:51:42 PM PST by
backhoe
To: neverdem
Police, of course, will be exempted from this "life saving" technology. Go figure.
13 posted on
01/08/2004 4:01:07 PM PST by
SJSAMPLE
To: neverdem
Oxymoron--" Smart gun reasearch sponsored by two of New Jersey's stupidest liberals"
17 posted on
01/08/2004 4:11:35 PM PST by
Renegade
To: neverdem
"Every day, a million children live and play in homes where there are loaded guns that they have access to," said Menendez, who inserted the grant into the federal spending billI'd like to know the source of that 'data'.
18 posted on
01/08/2004 4:17:36 PM PST by
paul51
To: neverdem
more pork for commies
19 posted on
01/08/2004 4:19:54 PM PST by
spunkets
To: neverdem
Exactly how many law enforcement agencies are going to adopt smart gun technology? I gauruntee you, zero. Why? Because cops know that the technology is dangerous and can render a gun useless in an emergency, self defense situation. Sweaty palms and a jittery hand will give prints rejected by nearly every fingerprint biometric device out there.
20 posted on
01/08/2004 4:28:32 PM PST by
Fun Bob
To: neverdem
What an amazing pile of steamy horses**t.
Hey, New Jersey.............a state that always chest-thumps about how tough you are, etc., etc., yada yada.................why do you put up with this barnyard matter?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson