Skip to comments.
Lawmakers who back abortion, euthanasia told not to receive Communion
Catholic News Service ^
| 1/8/04
| Dan Rossini
Posted on 01/08/2004 2:58:44 PM PST by madprof98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
One down . . . how many more to go?
1
posted on
01/08/2004 2:58:46 PM PST
by
madprof98
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
47 |
Norway |
50.00
|
1
|
50.00
|
14
|
3.57
|
|
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: CAtholic Family Association; Salvation; cpforlife.org; nickcarraway
Ping!
To: madprof98
You Go Archbishop.
4
posted on
01/08/2004 3:07:51 PM PST
by
Dogrobber
To: madprof98
If it's sin in LaCrosse, it's sin in St. Louis, Chicago, New York and ... Rome.
Given that, shouldn't the message come from the top down instead of from the bottom up?
Where does the Pope stand in this matter?
5
posted on
01/08/2004 3:08:03 PM PST
by
thinktwice
(America is truly blessed ... with George W. Bush as President..)
To: thinktwice
The Pope is VERY clear on abortion and euthanasia. 100% consistent.
PING!!!
Let's get some more Bishops like him!!!
To: GOP_Thug_Mom
It's about time! ping
7
posted on
01/08/2004 3:14:44 PM PST
by
pax_et_bonum
(Always finish what you st)
To: thinktwice
Where does the Pope stand in this matter? Pay attention. He has been very clear about it, and released YET ANOTHER admonition in 2003 making it clear that Catholics can't be pro-abortion.
8
posted on
01/08/2004 3:14:59 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
(Abolish the food tax)
To: thinktwice
Given that, shouldn't the message come from the top down instead of from the bottom up? From the article:
That document reiterates the pope's teaching that Catholics involved directly in lawmaking bodies have a "grave and clear obligation to oppose" any measure that is an attack on human life. "For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them," it says.
The Pope has made it clear and it has always been up to the local Cardinals and Bishops to enforce Church doctrine which they have been reluctant to do until now.
9
posted on
01/08/2004 3:15:45 PM PST
by
Mat_Helm
To: madprof98
AXIOS!!!
May his tribe increase. May Catholic and Orthodox bishops follow his excellent lead.
10
posted on
01/08/2004 3:20:13 PM PST
by
don-o
To: don-o
And what happens to the gay priest who defies the ban and gives them communion anyway? The one who knows how many of his former lovers now work for the Chancery? What happens?
I'll believe the bishies are getting tough when I see the excommunicate their own priests for living vile lives. Then with the remainder, go after the politicos.
To: madprof98
A drop in the bucket
12
posted on
01/08/2004 3:24:10 PM PST
by
Saundra Duffy
(For victory & freedom!!!)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Javelina
Why don't they do that for those who support the death penalty? Isn't the Catholic church against that as well? No. The Church has consistently said the state has the right to administer the death penalty, for one thing. But in the judgement of the Pope, and many of the bishops, if you can afford to be merciful while still protecting society by giving life without parole, that is far preferable. Still, it's a matter of judgement, weighing the different factors of justice, mercy, and hope for the prisoner's salvation.
They're only applying this to clear-cut, major issues, like the murder of innocents (abortion and euthanasia). There's no expectation of legislation against contraception, for example.
14
posted on
01/08/2004 3:42:54 PM PST
by
JohnnyZ
(Abolish the food tax)
To: Javelina
Why don't they do that for those who support the death penalty? Isn't the Catholic church against that as well?
>>>
Death penalty. 125 guilty guys a year.
Abortion. 1,250,000 innocent babies a year.
Any more silly questions?
To: madprof98
About time.
In this country, nobody HAS to be a Catholic. If they don't agree with the Church, they can go join something else or simply become lifetime members of NARAL and the ACLU.
Time to fish or cut bait.
16
posted on
01/08/2004 3:59:48 PM PST
by
livius
To: madprof98
Wow, you go Bishop!
To: Javelina
No, it is not.
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
But,But,But the SCOTUS said that it is legal to murder innocent little babies for money.
19
posted on
01/08/2004 4:14:50 PM PST
by
chiefqc
To: madprof98
Right on , What has Teddy Kennedy's Bishop got to say about this?
20
posted on
01/08/2004 4:21:48 PM PST
by
sgtbono2002
(I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-31 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson