Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lawmakers who back abortion, euthanasia told not to receive Communion
Catholic News Service ^ | 1/8/04 | Dan Rossini

Posted on 01/08/2004 2:58:44 PM PST by madprof98

LA CROSSE, Wis. (CNS) -- Archbishop Raymond L. Burke has formally notified Catholic lawmakers in the La Crosse Diocese that they cannot receive Communion if they continue to support procured abortion or euthanasia.

The four-paragraph canonical notification, published in the Jan. 8 edition of The Catholic Times, the La Crosse diocesan newspaper, called upon Catholic legislators in the diocese "to uphold the natural and divine law regarding the inviolable dignity of all human life."

"To fail to do so is a grave public sin and gives scandal to all the faithful," it said.

Archbishop Burke, who is to be installed Jan. 26 as St. Louis' new archbishop, released the canonical notification along with a 10-page pastoral letter to Catholics in the La Crosse Diocese about their political responsibility to uphold the value of human life.

He noted that the documents were issued while he is serving as diocesan administrator of La Crosse following his Dec. 2 appointment as archbishop of St. Louis. However, he said, the pastoral letter and the notification carry the full weight of his authority as bishop of La Crosse because both were signed Nov. 23, the feast of Christ the King.

"Catholic legislators who are members of the faithful of the Diocese of La Crosse and who continue to support procured abortion or euthanasia may not present themselves to receive holy Communion," the notification said. "They are not to be admitted to holy Communion, should they present themselves, until such time as they publicly renounce their support of these most unjust practices."

The two documents followed reports in the secular press in December that Archbishop Burke had sent private letters to three Catholic legislators in the diocese, warning them of the spiritual dangers of their votes against human life.

According to Archbishop Burke, the notification became necessary as an outcome of his correspondence with Catholic legislators. None of the three lawmakers to whom he wrote accepted his invitation for a private meeting to discuss their voting records, and in letters to the bishop indicated they were not open to changing their positions.

"After several exchanges of letters, it became clear in all three cases that there was no willingness to conform to the teaching of the church," he said. "So the notification became a necessity in order that the faithful in the diocese not be scandalized, thinking that it is acceptable for a devout Catholic to also be pro-abortion."

Archbishop Burke has declined to name the three politicians but secular news reports have identified two of them as state Sen. Julie Lassa and U.S. Rep. David R. Obey, D-Wis.

The archbishop said the simultaneous release of the two documents was a coincidence, since the pastoral letter had been in the works for months. "I'd been thinking about it for a long time, and working on it with the help of others, and we finally got it into its (final) form," he said.

"I've come to understand as bishop that there is a real confusion on the part of many people in the diocese with regard to the relationship of the moral law to our civil laws," he added. "So I wanted to write a letter to clarify this."

In the letter, titled "On the Dignity of Human Life and Civic Responsibility," Archbishop Burke said many Catholics misunderstand the concept of "separation of church and state," taking it to mean that church teachings have no application to political life.

The letter affirms, on the contrary, that Catholics have the obligation to form their political judgments from church teachings, "especially in what pertains to the natural moral law, that is, the order established by God in creation."

"If the Catholic Church insisted to legislators that they vote for laws that punish people who steal, no one would find anything objectionable in that," said the archbishop in the document. "People all recognize that to take someone else's property is a crime. The natural law teaches us that. So also it teaches that human life is inviolable."

The letter also addresses the position of some Catholic politicians who say their efforts to help the poor and marginalized make up for the fact they do not vote consistently in favor of protecting life, and that in a democracy legislators are bound to vote according to the will of the majority of their constituents.

The archbishop's notification on reception of Communion cites a passage from the "Doctrinal Note on Some Questions Regarding the Participation of Catholics in Political Life," issued by the Vatican Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in January 2003.

That document reiterates the pope's teaching that Catholics involved directly in lawmaking bodies have a "grave and clear obligation to oppose" any measure that is an attack on human life. "For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them," it says.

- - -

Editor's Note: The pastoral letter and the notification are posted on the Web site of the Diocese of La Crosse, www.dioceseoflacrosse.com.

END


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: catholicpoliticians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
One down . . . how many more to go?
1 posted on 01/08/2004 2:58:46 PM PST by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
47 Norway 50.00
1
50.00
14
3.57


Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/08/2004 3:00:06 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CAtholic Family Association; Salvation; cpforlife.org; nickcarraway
Ping!
3 posted on 01/08/2004 3:00:49 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
You Go Archbishop.
4 posted on 01/08/2004 3:07:51 PM PST by Dogrobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
If it's sin in LaCrosse, it's sin in St. Louis, Chicago, New York and ... Rome.

Given that, shouldn't the message come from the top down instead of from the bottom up?

Where does the Pope stand in this matter?

5 posted on 01/08/2004 3:08:03 PM PST by thinktwice (America is truly blessed ... with George W. Bush as President..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinktwice
The Pope is VERY clear on abortion and euthanasia. 100% consistent.

PING!!!

Let's get some more Bishops like him!!!

6 posted on 01/08/2004 3:12:17 PM PST by davidwendell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Thug_Mom
It's about time! ping
7 posted on 01/08/2004 3:14:44 PM PST by pax_et_bonum (Always finish what you st)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thinktwice
Where does the Pope stand in this matter?

Pay attention. He has been very clear about it, and released YET ANOTHER admonition in 2003 making it clear that Catholics can't be pro-abortion.

8 posted on 01/08/2004 3:14:59 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Abolish the food tax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: thinktwice
Given that, shouldn't the message come from the top down instead of from the bottom up?

From the article:

That document reiterates the pope's teaching that Catholics involved directly in lawmaking bodies have a "grave and clear obligation to oppose" any measure that is an attack on human life. "For them, as for every Catholic, it is impossible to promote such laws or to vote for them," it says.

The Pope has made it clear and it has always been up to the local Cardinals and Bishops to enforce Church doctrine which they have been reluctant to do until now.

9 posted on 01/08/2004 3:15:45 PM PST by Mat_Helm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
AXIOS!!!

May his tribe increase. May Catholic and Orthodox bishops follow his excellent lead.

10 posted on 01/08/2004 3:20:13 PM PST by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o
And what happens to the gay priest who defies the ban and gives them communion anyway? The one who knows how many of his former lovers now work for the Chancery? What happens?

I'll believe the bishies are getting tough when I see the excommunicate their own priests for living vile lives. Then with the remainder, go after the politicos.
11 posted on 01/08/2004 3:23:19 PM PST by Ronly Bonly Jones (the more things change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
A drop in the bucket
12 posted on 01/08/2004 3:24:10 PM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: Javelina
Why don't they do that for those who support the death penalty? Isn't the Catholic church against that as well?

No. The Church has consistently said the state has the right to administer the death penalty, for one thing. But in the judgement of the Pope, and many of the bishops, if you can afford to be merciful while still protecting society by giving life without parole, that is far preferable. Still, it's a matter of judgement, weighing the different factors of justice, mercy, and hope for the prisoner's salvation.

They're only applying this to clear-cut, major issues, like the murder of innocents (abortion and euthanasia). There's no expectation of legislation against contraception, for example.

14 posted on 01/08/2004 3:42:54 PM PST by JohnnyZ (Abolish the food tax)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
Why don't they do that for those who support the death penalty? Isn't the Catholic church against that as well?
>>>

Death penalty. 125 guilty guys a year.

Abortion. 1,250,000 innocent babies a year.

Any more silly questions?
15 posted on 01/08/2004 3:57:39 PM PST by Ronly Bonly Jones (the more things change...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
About time.

In this country, nobody HAS to be a Catholic. If they don't agree with the Church, they can go join something else or simply become lifetime members of NARAL and the ACLU.

Time to fish or cut bait.
16 posted on 01/08/2004 3:59:48 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Wow, you go Bishop!
17 posted on 01/08/2004 4:02:48 PM PST by RightWinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Javelina
No, it is not.
18 posted on 01/08/2004 4:14:47 PM PST by caisson71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
But,But,But the SCOTUS said that it is legal to murder innocent little babies for money.
19 posted on 01/08/2004 4:14:50 PM PST by chiefqc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: madprof98
Right on , What has Teddy Kennedy's Bishop got to say about this?
20 posted on 01/08/2004 4:21:48 PM PST by sgtbono2002 (I aint wrong, I aint sorry , and I am probably going to do it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson