To: MainFrame65
"Militarizing this border would probsbly require about 50 men per mile, plus support personnel, "
Nonsense. In the rural areas, you put up a fence and could man it with about 1-2 persons per mile, making sure the integrity of the fence is maintained. A team of 20 could be well-covering a 10 mile stretch round the clock. Add in UAVs and cameras and motion-detectors, and you're all set.
build a fence and you will need only 20,000 men/women to man the borders.
As for Canada, it is much less of a problem anyway.
306 posted on
01/08/2004 11:40:18 AM PST by
WOSG
(Freedom, Baby! Yeah!)
To: WOSG
Ah, but if you seal the Mexican border, then wouldn't the Canadian border become a problem?
Or is the issue not about national security, but about MEXICANS?
How much will this fence cost?
314 posted on
01/08/2004 11:49:25 AM PST by
Pan_Yans Wife
(Freedom is a package deal - with it comes responsibilities and consequences.)
To: WOSG
"In the rural areas, you put up a fence and could man it with about 1-2 persons per mile, making sure the integrity of the fence is maintained. A team of 20 could be well-covering a 10 mile stretch round the clock."A man alone is a target - and with a guarded border, the value of penetration rises. And how many hours - and days - are these soldiers going to work? Also, consider the closed borders that are penetration targets today, like the one between Egypt and Gaza, as well as in the Southern California area. New tunnels are being dug all the time, probably faster than we can find them. Guarding the fence is not enough.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson