Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Simkanin guilty of 29 counts of tax violations
Fort Worth Star-Telegram ^ | 1/8/2004 | Max Baker

Posted on 01/08/2004 5:56:20 AM PST by sinkspur

FORT WORTH - After deliberating for more than 13 hours over two days, a federal jury Wednesday convicted Bedford businessman and tax protester Richard Simkanin on 29 counts of violating U.S. income tax laws.

The jury of six men and six women delivered its verdict shortly after 8 p.m. They remained deadlocked on two counts within the indictment, leading U.S. District Judge John McBryde to declare a mistrial on those charges.

Simkanin stood silently with his hands behind his back, showing no emotion, as a court clerk read the 29 guilty verdicts. Some supporters in the courtroom dabbed their eyes; others glared at the judge.

Simkanin, 59, is scheduled to be sentenced April 30, Assistant U.S. Attorney David Jarvis said. He can get up to five years on each of the 25 felony counts and up to a year on each of the four misdemeanor charges.

"Justice was served, and we're pleased that the jury understood that no one is above the law," Jarvis said.

Arch McColl, the Dallas lawyer representing Simkanin, said his client was denied a fair trial because McBryde did not allow him to present key evidence on whether Social Security, Medicare and income taxes are voluntary.

McColl said he expects to win on appeal, but he added that it is time for Americans to pay attention to what happened in court.

"I'm terribly disappointed," McColl said. "It was not a fair trial in accordance with the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution that includes the fundamental right to present evidence on your own behalf."

Robert Schulz, founder of We the People Foundation for Constitutional Education, a group that questions the validity of the nation's tax laws, told Simkanin's supporters that the defendant was prepared for the worst.

"His spirits are fine. His faith is strong," Schulz said.

This is the second time Simkanin has gone on trial. In November, McBryde declared a mistrial when jurors who deliberated for eight hours said that they were deadlocked and could not reach a unanimous verdict.

Simkanin is almost considered to be a political prisoner by groups that question the validity of the nation's tax laws. They contend that most Americans are not required to pay income taxes.

They are particularly hostile toward the Internal Revenue Service, an agency that, they say, is not an official government entity.

Simkanin's supporters came from around the country. They held a vigil at the courthouse, at one time praying in the hallway. They often gave him a thumbs-up gesture as he entered the courtroom. Once, Simkanin got a standing ovation.

During the trial, Simkanin testified that he didn't withhold employees' taxes for Medicare and Social Security benefits because his research did not produce a law showing that participation in the programs was mandatory.

But Simkanin backed away from some of his anti-government comments, saying they were a mistake. He once wrote to the U.S. Treasury secretary saying that he had repatriated himself from the United States to the "Republic of Texas."

When McColl tried to query witnesses on legal definitions of "employee" and "wages," McBryde cut him off. The judge told jurors they could not question the constitutionality of the tax code.

Prosecutors put 11 witnesses on the stand to show that Simkanin knew what he was doing when he stopped withholding and paying taxes. Under federal tax laws, ignorance of tax codes can be used as a legal defense.

Jurors sent out seven notes during their 11 hours of deliberations Wednesday.

They asked for legal definitions and whether they had to review evidence on who does have to pay taxes.

McColl said his client's company, Arrow Custom Plastics, is in deep financial trouble because of his fights with the government. Simkanin has been in jail since June.

Simkanin was convicted on 10 felony counts of failing to withhold about $139,000 in taxes from employees' wages and 15 felony counts of filing false tax refund claims for about $235,000.

He also was found guilty of four misdemeanor counts of not filing individual income tax returns from 1998 to 2001. Simkanin had an estimated gross income of about $410,000 during those years, according to the indictment.

Dottie Harrison, a Simkanin supporter from Houston, said his allies will continue to fight.

"I'm in shock, but the determined energy everyone feels to overturn this injustice will be a catalyst that will expose the entire IRS fraud," she said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: bobschulz; dicksimkanin; givemeliberty; schulz; simkanin; taxhonesty; taxprotest; taxprotester; wethepeople
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-334 next last
To: Dead Corpse
Early on he said he was not in agreement with those who thought government caused problems. I took him at his word on that. I didn't vote for him then, and I won't now.
61 posted on 01/08/2004 7:26:54 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Well, let me ask, what if Simkanin was right? What if the witholding is a violation of the Constitution? And that "lawful tax collection" isn't so lawful after all? What if? We won't know because the judge decided the case before it was ever presented. Denying motions without even reading them is judicial arrogance. Sustaining objections not even made is judicial malprudence. Preventing the defense from even presenting a case, forget presenting it's case, is judicial abuse. Refusing to answer questions under oath because you know the judge won't bother you about it is arrogance and smacks of buyoffs. The whole thing doesn't pass the smell test. It stinks to high heaven.
62 posted on 01/08/2004 7:26:56 AM PST by spacewarp (Visit the American Patriot Party and stay a while. http://www.patriotparty.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
Speak for yourself.
63 posted on 01/08/2004 7:27:51 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Wake up!
You don't seem to get it, that in our Republic, the people are the final arbiters. They have the Constitutional right to step in and make necessary corrections.

I sometimes get the impression that if the government said the sky is orange, you would say: "Oh, I'm starting to see it now...yes!"

Of course, the jury, and the people can eliminate bad law, why do you think you can still buy a mixed drink today, if your so inclined?

We can fix the problem of bad government if enough of us want to. Don't wait for government to admit their wrong, we won't live long enough to see that happen!
64 posted on 01/08/2004 7:28:04 AM PST by citizenx7 ("The people...are the only sure reliance for the preservation of our liberty!" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: 31R1O
Couldn't people file a class action lawsuit against the IRS.

That's EXACTLY what needs to be done.

U.S.C., TITLE 18,Part I, Chapter 13, SECTION 242
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

One of the primary foundations in the establishment of our country is that we have an unalienable right to the fruits of our labor.

65 posted on 01/08/2004 7:28:51 AM PST by MamaTexan (If ya cain't bark with the big dogs, get off the front porch (:- p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
but the alternative is to have voluntary payment of taxes.

Nonsense. There are many alternatives. But they do not suit the needs of the rulers. Or their apologists.

66 posted on 01/08/2004 7:29:12 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: spacewarp
The courts have already ruled on the matter. This guy is guilty of falling for a scam based on lies. It's no different than the people who fall for the Nigerian scam.
67 posted on 01/08/2004 7:29:19 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Speak for yourself.

I will if you will.

You spoke for the whole forum with this line;
Here at FreeRepublic we do not cheer fraud and abuse in government, and neither do we do so in citizens.

68 posted on 01/08/2004 7:32:22 AM PST by Protagoras (When they asked me what I thought of freedom in America,,, I said I thought it would be a good idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: spacewarp
What if the witholding is a violation of the Constitution?

It's not. The USSC has decided it.

And that "lawful tax collection" isn't so lawful after all? What if?

It is lawful. Same USSC.

We won't know because the judge decided the case before it was ever presented.

The judge does not have to allow settled law to be argued in a courtroom.

That's all you tax protesters have, to put the law on trial instead of the perp.

If you don't like the law, change the law! I'll help you. I'll give money to you.

But if I've got to pay taxes and witholding, Simkanin's got to pay taxes and witholding.

And the idjit would, apparently, rather go out of business and put people out of work than pay the taxes he owes!

69 posted on 01/08/2004 7:32:46 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: spacewarp
Everyone is entitled to do whatsoever they want to, so long as they accept the consequences of their freewill actions. Henry David Thoreau was once jailed for refusing to pay a poll tax he thought was unjust. A friend came to visit him and asked him, "What are you doing in jail?" to which Thoreau replied, "And what are you doing out of jail?"
70 posted on 01/08/2004 7:32:57 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
I'm still trying to figure out what my alternatives are. Democrat/Green was never an option. The LP has lost its mind over the Terrorist issue. The Constitution party was always a bit too southern Baptist for my pagan tastes. I could vote for Tancredo or Paul on a Republican ticket. But pigs will fly first before the GOP gives up on their golden boy George.

Not voting, joining the other 51% of the population who can't be bothered or no longer believe in the system, is not an option either. It has long been my belief that apathy does more harm than good in the long run.

Something has got to give eventually....

71 posted on 01/08/2004 7:33:40 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: citizenx7
They have the Constitutional right to step in and make necessary corrections.

Yes. Through their elected representatives.

Of course, the jury, and the people can eliminate bad law, why do you think you can still buy a mixed drink today, if your so inclined?

Yes. That was done through a constitutional amendment, not through juries deciding that people could have stills in their back yards.

72 posted on 01/08/2004 7:35:05 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
That is true. There are anarcho-ideologues and social-Darwinists who cheer the corruption of the populace, the corrosion people's ability to self-govern, and the shirking of personal responsibility as some kind of sacred rights. But when I said 'FreeRepublic' I excluded those self-marginalized types from my statement.
73 posted on 01/08/2004 7:36:18 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Protagoras
That is true. There are anarcho-ideologues and social-Darwinists who cheer the corruption of the populace, the corrosion of people's ability to self-govern, and the shirking of personal responsibility as some kind of sacred rights. But when I said 'FreeRepublic' I excluded those self-marginalized types from my statement.
74 posted on 01/08/2004 7:37:00 AM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Stoptaxing
All I've gotta say is that they can't jail all of us.

Um, wrong. With RFID technology and Matrix records-crossreferencing, they are coming up with dandy ways to jail us while we seem to be free.

75 posted on 01/08/2004 7:37:19 AM PST by Lazamataz (I stole this tagline from Conspiracy Guy. I beat him up and took it. That's because I can.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
The judge told jurors they could not question the constitutionality of the tax code.

A juror does not have to listen to anything the judge has to say.
76 posted on 01/08/2004 7:37:30 AM PST by microgood (They will all die......most of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
So the USSC has said the US Constutition allows for withholindg?

Article. XVI. [Proposed 1909; Questionably Ratified 1913]
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

They must be using a different copy of the Constitution. Where does it say the government can make an employer a defacto IRS agent by forcing them to withhold income taxes? Or is this another thing like Roe V Wade where the USSC is somehow granted authority, from somewhere, to WRITE law?

77 posted on 01/08/2004 7:38:57 AM PST by Dead Corpse (For an Evil Super Genius, you aren't too bright are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: microgood
A juror does not have to listen to anything the judge has to say.

That's absolutely true. If anything, Simkanin ought to kick his defense attorney, Arch McColl, for not getting the right jury.

78 posted on 01/08/2004 7:39:05 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Marbury vs. Madison sets the precedent that the USSC decides the constitutionality of laws.

And the Constitution empowers the Congress to set exceptions to areas of review by the Supreme Court. Furthermore, nothing in Marbury v. Madison says that juries cannot examine and use as criteria their own judgement about the constitutionality of laws. If so, surely you could point it out. In fact, John Jay, first Cheif Justice of the USSC wrote in the decision Georgia v. Brailsford, "The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy."

If you weren't aware of this, that's fine, no one could or should expect omniscience in their fellow man. But to deny this upon learning of it is to deliberately maintain ignorance in the face of evidence, ergo you are unreasonable. I won't bother trying to reason with you anymore.

79 posted on 01/08/2004 7:40:04 AM PST by Gunslingr3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Dead Corpse
Well come visit our site and take a look. The American Patriot Party is a young and growing party. We're harnessing the power of a positive message of change and a return back to the limited government our country was founded on. We oppose the IRS, DOE, and many other of the alphabet soup for the government departments. We believe there is too much fraud and waste in our government and are willing to fight to get things done about it. We are conservative for the most part, but we also have the platform that the government should stay our of our personal lives as long as we're not hurting anyone. I guess the easiest way to describe our philosophy is "Government out of our pocketbook and bedroom."

The American Patriot Party is found at http://www.patriotparty.us Paul

80 posted on 01/08/2004 7:40:34 AM PST by spacewarp (Visit the American Patriot Party and stay a while. http://www.patriotparty.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-334 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson