Replies

I didn't hear Dimitrius make the comments you quoted, but I did hear the remark you quoted by Ted Rowlands.

I saw one part where a caller called in and asked, "who is paying for the defense now?" And King just was very dismissive, in that someone on his panel said shortly, "The Petersons have money", and he repeated that, "The Petersons have money." He might have said "Period" after that, b/c that's the tone in which he said it.

Larry King makes me vomit. He is such a smarmy liberal ass; usually it doesn't matter, b/c he just sits there like the milquetoast he is. But every now and then one sees that little undercurrent of anger that he carries for anyone who doesn't fully embrace his liberal views.

I know that it's not necessarily a liberal thing to defend Scott, but I assume that the reason Larry is so squarely pro-Scott is b/c Scott is represented by one of Larry's good friends, a fellow Clinton-era libnut--Mark Geragos.

I find it extremely difficult to watch Larry because *spittle* settles in the corners of his mouth. My brain keeps screaming "Somebody hand that guy a tissue!!!" and I end up missing the show anyway.

What WAS that comment about the bald spot? I did see it in the transcript. They were referring to Larry's bald spot? And someone who was dropped on their head? Confusing.

Your post #15 - A BIG AMEN!! I really cannot stomach Larry King any longer. I have begun to even dislike Demtrius. She will work for ANY scumbag for $$!! None of these people have any principles. I'm sure Geragos has told everyone (who incidentally are under a GAG ORDER) to be very confident as IF they have some ground breaking news. Bull$hit!!

I have never understood how Larry King ever got his job! He is the worst interviewer going, and so biased it is sickening.

The judge of course fell for the bogus no fair trial in Modesto BS of the slime lawyer. It is the people who can't get a fair trial these days, not the big media defendant.