Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Judge says most women enjoy being abused and ask to get “smacked around”: Resigns
NYS Commission on Judicial Conduct

Posted on 01/07/2004 10:46:21 AM PST by 1Old Pro

 

The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct has completed formal proceedings against Robert Hamley, a former justice of the Hunter Village Court, Greene County.  Pursuant to a stipulation, which the Commission approved on December 11, 2003, the proceedings were discontinued and the case was closed.

Under the terms of the stipulation, Judge Hamley waived the statutory provision of confidentiality applicable to Commission proceedings, to the limited extent that the stipulation would be made public.  The stipulation indicates the following:

bullet

The Commission served a Formal Written Complaint on Judge Hamley dated July 17, 2003, containing two charges;

bullet

One Charge alleged that Judge Hamley made improper statements about the victims of domestic violence, including telling one alleged victim that all domestic violence cases are a “waste of the court’s time” and telling a trooper that most women enjoy being abused and ask to get “smacked around”;

bullet

The other Charge alleged that Judge Hamley took jurisdiction of two traffic charges that were pending before another court, engaged in prohibited ex parte communications with the defendant and the mayor of Hunter about the cases, and improperly disposed of the cases;

bullet

A hearing in the matter was scheduled to commence on November 18, 2003, before a referee, Joseph A. Barrette, Esq.;

bullet

Judge Hamley acknowledged that he could not successfully defend the charges against him; and

bullet

Judge Hamley resigned on November 17, 2003, effective immediately, and agreed that he would neither seek nor accept judicial office at any time in the future.

The stipulation and the Commission’s order closing the case can be found at the Commission’s website:   www.scjc.state.ny.us.  (On the home page, click on “Recent Decisions,” then click on “2003 Decisions.”)


TOPICS: Government; US: New York
KEYWORDS: judicialconduct; notpc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 01/07/2004 10:46:22 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
What did he do wrong?
2 posted on 01/07/2004 10:49:00 AM PST by ChadsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Wow, This guy should never have been a Judge.
3 posted on 01/07/2004 10:49:37 AM PST by passionfruit (passionate about my politics, and from the land of fruits and nuts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
What did he do wrong?

Violated the NYS commission on judicial conduct guidlines.

4 posted on 01/07/2004 10:51:23 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
Well, I wonder if, had she been alive, he would've said this to a client of ours. She was stabbed 14 times by her husband in their front yard. She probably asked for it, right?
5 posted on 01/07/2004 10:51:54 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Kidding.
6 posted on 01/07/2004 10:52:22 AM PST by ChadsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ChadsDad
please please please tell me you're joking ... please
7 posted on 01/07/2004 10:54:23 AM PST by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Ha! This judge knows nothin' 'bout dames.
"most women enjoy "... cooking and cleaning!
8 posted on 01/07/2004 10:56:31 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Did Mrs, Hamley issue a statement of support for her husband?
9 posted on 01/07/2004 10:58:06 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
anyone know who appointed this guy
10 posted on 01/07/2004 11:01:49 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
She was probably enjoying a gag order.
11 posted on 01/07/2004 11:01:59 AM PST by Lee Heggy (When truth and logic fail high explosives are applicable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
Did Mrs, Hamley issue a statement of support for her husband?

If she didn't she's just asking for it, I guess.

12 posted on 01/07/2004 11:02:08 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DM1
anyone know who appointed this guy

The voters.

13 posted on 01/07/2004 11:03:15 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
He was noted voted in, he was appointed.
14 posted on 01/07/2004 11:10:09 AM PST by Righter-than-Rush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I believe the judge was influenced by his observation of not-infrequent cases in which the female victim asks that her assailant not be arrested or refuses to sign a complaint against him if he is arrested, sometimes after repeated assaults. The judge did choose the wrong words to characterize such women who do not like their abuse but are psychologically unable to take the steps necessary to extricate themselves from the situation.
15 posted on 01/07/2004 11:10:35 AM PST by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: passionfruit
There are many judges who never should rise above dog catcher.

I was once in traffic court to have a speeding ticket reduced and was asked by the judge when was the last time I received a moving violation. My answer was seventeen years and he told me that he didn't believe me and only reduced the fine a small amount. He did the same for the man after me, who like me was new to the area. Then a local came up and he asked how long they had lived in the area, reduced the fine by half and stated that, we locals have to stick together.
16 posted on 01/07/2004 11:16:37 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
And there is the case of the controlling woman whose favorite game is prodding and provoking the weak husband to some kind of action, even if it be violence. Have you seen that?
17 posted on 01/07/2004 11:19:07 AM PST by Hidgy (LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Ol' judge isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer, that's for sure.
18 posted on 01/07/2004 11:20:54 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
Proof that RUH reads FR
19 posted on 01/07/2004 11:24:53 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro
I mean RUSH, he's reading this now.
20 posted on 01/07/2004 11:25:15 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson