Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: 'Events' Don't Just Happen
The Jerusalem Post ^
| January 6, 2004
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 01/06/2004 5:34:56 PM PST by quidnunc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
1
posted on
01/06/2004 5:34:56 PM PST
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
This had to be exerpted why???? I hate giving anyone market data about myself - even the J Post.
2
posted on
01/06/2004 5:46:33 PM PST
by
corkoman
(Logged in - have you?)
To: corkoman
corkoman wrote;
This had to be exerpted why????It's called the federal copyright law.
I hate giving anyone market data about myself - even the J Post.
Go to SteynOnline and access the article from there.
3
posted on
01/06/2004 5:49:09 PM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
Comment #4 Removed by Moderator
To: quidnunc
The Federal Copyright Law also has something called "section 107," which states, among other things:
the fair use of a copyrighted work, ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
Take a look around here on Free Republic, and you'll notice quite a bit of criticism, comment, and news reporting going on.
5
posted on
01/06/2004 6:01:37 PM PST
by
mvpel
(Michael Pelletier)
Comment #6 Removed by Moderator
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: seamole
LOL Now, there's a ping list I'm happy to be on!!!
9
posted on
01/06/2004 6:06:42 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
To: mvpel
mvpel wrote:
The Federal Copyright Law also has something called "section 107," which states, among other things: the fair use of a copyrighted work, ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Take a look around here on Free Republic, and you'll notice quite a bit of criticism, comment, and news reporting going on.Free Republic doesn't qualify for fair use: That precedent has been established in federal court.
10
posted on
01/06/2004 6:06:46 PM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: mvpel
quidnunc is one of "those" who does things just to annoy people.
11
posted on
01/06/2004 6:08:43 PM PST
by
polemikos
(Kool Aid -- The Breakfast of Democrats)
To: seamole
Harold MacMillan couldn't have been more wrong. "Events" are the least of it.
What MacMillan should have said he was afraid of were, "Consequences, dear boy, consequences."
We know what those are, right? It is the difference in these that dictated attacking Iraq instead of Saudi
Arabia or North Korea.
12
posted on
01/06/2004 6:13:48 PM PST
by
gcruse
(http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: polemikos; mvpel; quidnunc
Hey, stop flaming quiddy -- he's a good guy. However, quidnunc, I also resent having to go through that palaaver to see the rest of the article when it's not necessary.
15
posted on
01/06/2004 6:20:37 PM PST
by
expatpat
To: seamole
seamole wrote:
In the 9th Circuit, which I'm sure is your favorite. You do realize that it is legally impossible for Free Republic to ban you. Perhaps that's why you only post excerpted articles, and barely any replies to other threads: you'd hate to give the site owner any excuse to kick you out of his own home. How does it make you feel to intrude on another's private property only because you have the backing of a court? I'm honestly curious as to why someone would choose to live his life this way.I have an idea: I'll go on about my business and you concentrate on minding your own.
I spend most of my time rummaging around on the Internet keeping abreast of current events, and when I find an interesting article I post it on several web sites.
If it is especially interesting I also post it on FR but unlike some I don't make this my sole venue.
16
posted on
01/06/2004 6:23:14 PM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: quidnunc
Free Republic doesn't qualify for fair use: That precedent has been established in federal court.If I'm not mistaken (and I may be), neither an admission of guilt nor a ruling took place; rather, an agreement between effected parties took place. Which means that the battle can be fought another day, hopefully in a friendlier atmosphere.
17
posted on
01/06/2004 6:28:29 PM PST
by
meyer
To: quidnunc
If it is especially interesting I also post it on FR but unlike some I don't make this my sole venue.Interesting. What other venues to you like to frequent?
To: seamole
Steyn hits another out of the park! I want this man cloned! Quickly!
19
posted on
01/06/2004 6:29:41 PM PST
by
wizardoz
("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
To: wizardoz
Do you think we can have a "Mark Steyn" forum along with "General Interest (Chat)" and "News/Activism"?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson