Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mvpel
mvpel wrote: The Federal Copyright Law also has something called "section 107," which states, among other things: the fair use of a copyrighted work, ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Take a look around here on Free Republic, and you'll notice quite a bit of criticism, comment, and news reporting going on.

Free Republic doesn't qualify for fair use: That precedent has been established in federal court.

10 posted on 01/06/2004 6:06:46 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: quidnunc
Free Republic doesn't qualify for fair use: That precedent has been established in federal court.

If I'm not mistaken (and I may be), neither an admission of guilt nor a ruling took place; rather, an agreement between effected parties took place. Which means that the battle can be fought another day, hopefully in a friendlier atmosphere.

17 posted on 01/06/2004 6:28:29 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson