Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: 'Events' Don't Just Happen
The Jerusalem Post ^ | January 6, 2004 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 01/06/2004 5:34:56 PM PST by quidnunc

One of the most tediously over-venerated bits of political wisdom comes from the late British prime minister Harold MacMillan. It was his characteristically laconic Edwardian response as to what he feared most in the months ahead: "Events, dear boy, events."

It turns up in a gazillion books of quotations and 1,000 Fleet Street columns as if it's some brilliant insight.

It's not. It's an urbane banality. Even events come, so to speak, politically predetermined. If, for example, you have powerful public sector unions, you will be at the mercy of potentially crippling strikes. The quasi-Eastern European Britain of the 1970s was brought to a halt by a miners' strike in a way that would have been impossible in the United States.

A strike, of course, is man-made. But the best test of the political character of "events" is supposedly natural phenomena.

Six years ago this week an ice storm devastated my corner of the Eastern Seaboard. On the Vermont/New Hampshire side of the border folks were without power for a couple of days. On the Quebec side of the border some were without power for the best part of a couple of months.

Did God spot the frontier posts on His GPS monitor and decide to afflict Quebecers more? Doesn't seem likely. It's true the pictures of Montreal on the morning of the ice storm look much worse than those of Burlington, Vermont. But that's because in Montreal the streets were still clogged with uncleared snow from the previous week, thanks to the unionized municipal government's desultory approach to winter maintenance.

Here's a starker example: The two images that for me sum up the aftermath of September 11 — on the one hand, the New York firemen pounding up the stairs of the World Trade Center to rescue those in the towers; and, on the other, a fire in Mecca a few months later.

Some young Saudi girls were trying to flee a blazing school, but they were prevented from doing so by the mutaween — the religious police — who beat them with sticks and drove them back inside the building to perish in the flames. Why would they do such a thing? Because the girls, in their haste to escape the inferno, had neglected to put on their head scarves. Fifteen of them died.

It really is as basic as that: There are cultures that create civic institutions to rescue you from the fire, and there are cultures which create civic institutions to push you back in and be consumed.

Last year provided some especially salutary lessons in the political nature of "events:"

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at jpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: excerptmadness; marksteyn; steyn; stoptheexcerpts
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2004 5:34:56 PM PST by quidnunc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
This had to be exerpted why???? I hate giving anyone market data about myself - even the J Post.
2 posted on 01/06/2004 5:46:33 PM PST by corkoman (Logged in - have you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: corkoman
corkoman wrote; This had to be exerpted why????

It's called the federal copyright law.

I hate giving anyone market data about myself - even the J Post.

Go to SteynOnline and access the article from there.

3 posted on 01/06/2004 5:49:09 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc
The Federal Copyright Law also has something called "section 107," which states, among other things:

the fair use of a copyrighted work, ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.

Take a look around here on Free Republic, and you'll notice quite a bit of criticism, comment, and news reporting going on.

5 posted on 01/06/2004 6:01:37 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: seamole
LOL Now, there's a ping list I'm happy to be on!!!
9 posted on 01/06/2004 6:06:42 PM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
mvpel wrote: The Federal Copyright Law also has something called "section 107," which states, among other things: the fair use of a copyrighted work, ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. Take a look around here on Free Republic, and you'll notice quite a bit of criticism, comment, and news reporting going on.

Free Republic doesn't qualify for fair use: That precedent has been established in federal court.

10 posted on 01/06/2004 6:06:46 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
quidnunc is one of "those" who does things just to annoy people.
11 posted on 01/06/2004 6:08:43 PM PST by polemikos (Kool Aid -- The Breakfast of Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Harold MacMillan couldn't have been more wrong. "Events" are the least of it.

What MacMillan should have said he was afraid of were, "Consequences, dear boy, consequences."
We know what those are, right?  It is the difference in these that dictated attacking Iraq instead of Saudi
Arabia or North Korea.
12 posted on 01/06/2004 6:13:48 PM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: polemikos; mvpel; quidnunc
Hey, stop flaming quiddy -- he's a good guy. However, quidnunc, I also resent having to go through that palaaver to see the rest of the article when it's not necessary.
15 posted on 01/06/2004 6:20:37 PM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: seamole
seamole wrote: In the 9th Circuit, which I'm sure is your favorite. You do realize that it is legally impossible for Free Republic to ban you. Perhaps that's why you only post excerpted articles, and barely any replies to other threads: you'd hate to give the site owner any excuse to kick you out of his own home. How does it make you feel to intrude on another's private property only because you have the backing of a court? I'm honestly curious as to why someone would choose to live his life this way.

I have an idea: I'll go on about my business and you concentrate on minding your own.

I spend most of my time rummaging around on the Internet keeping abreast of current events, and when I find an interesting article I post it on several web sites.

If it is especially interesting I also post it on FR but unlike some I don't make this my sole venue.

16 posted on 01/06/2004 6:23:14 PM PST by quidnunc (Omnis Gaul delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Free Republic doesn't qualify for fair use: That precedent has been established in federal court.

If I'm not mistaken (and I may be), neither an admission of guilt nor a ruling took place; rather, an agreement between effected parties took place. Which means that the battle can be fought another day, hopefully in a friendlier atmosphere.

17 posted on 01/06/2004 6:28:29 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
If it is especially interesting I also post it on FR but unlike some I don't make this my sole venue.

Interesting. What other venues to you like to frequent?

18 posted on 01/06/2004 6:28:29 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Steyn hits another out of the park! I want this man cloned! Quickly!
19 posted on 01/06/2004 6:29:41 PM PST by wizardoz ("Crikey! I've lost my mojo!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wizardoz
Do you think we can have a "Mark Steyn" forum along with "General Interest (Chat)" and "News/Activism"?
20 posted on 01/06/2004 6:30:34 PM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson