[JohnGalt]

I never suggested the author was anything but very sincere-- all too sincere. He does not care about socialism and merely supports the GOP because he is looking for a security welfare handout for his home area.

I suggested that he is a phony, which in the context of the article, implied phony Republican-- and I stated my point that I did not feel any relief about the authors context for supporting the liberal agenda of internationalism.

[thoughtomator]

The opinion he expressed with regards to internationalist security is widely held in the GOP. Far from being a phony Republican, his opinion squares with GOP policy well.