CAIR Seething Over FBI Nuke Defense Program
The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a Washington-based civil rights and radical Islamic front group, is very upset tonight about the FBI’s program that monitors mosques for increases in radiation levels that might signal the presence of nuclear weapons: FBI Official Defends Radiation Monitoring. link: 255 comments If the FBI WAS NOT looking at these mosques it would a dereliction of duty of the highest order. There are well-known terror mosques where hatred of Christians, Jews, and Jihad are preached, openly.There are well-known terror mosques who's regular attendees have been arrested in notorious terror plots: The Al-Qods Mosque in Brooklyn (1993 WTC bombing, Blind Sheik Abdul Rahman, various 9/11 plotters); the Lodi Cell Mosque, the Lackawanna Mosque, etc.
You bet the muslims are being "targeted" just for being muslims.
After all, we infidels are targeted just because we're infidels.
So the muslims should get used to it.
"It is certainly true that not all Muslims are terrorists, however, sadly we say that the majority of terrorists in the world are Muslims." Abd al-Rahman al-Rashid, September 23, 2004
Why do we allow muslims and mosques in America if they must be monitored for possible nuclear threats?
| #265 |  |
Jim Rockford 12/24/2005 02:19AM PST |
|
Zombie -- What the NSA program is quite simply is brilliant. A lot of the non-reaction to Able Danger now becomes unsurprising by GWB. I have more respect for him than ever. If I understand the NYT article correctly and it's reported properly; the actual phone calls and contents of emails were not screened or recorded. Instead the Data connections themselves were analyzed in massive quantities to find "which of these things is not like the other" on a massive scale. We're talking about Petabytes of data; statistically analyzed (and various other mathematical analysis) to find things that don't fit ordinary behavior but do fit terrorist comms or other actions. Brilliant. Simply put the NSA put together a massive org chart of Al Qaeda based on their comms cleverly plucked out of all the phone and e-mail traffic going through US phone company switches. Admin pushed telecom companies to get more international traffic just so they could match up the linkages. Brilliant. NO WONDER Al Qaeda went up against the best of the anti-terrorism best and won every time. India, UK, Turkey, Spain, Jordan and Tunisia all had extensive experience beating other terrorists, and got spanked by Al Qaeda. After 9/11 not us. Why? Because we did what Al Qaeda could not even conceive of doing, what no other nation could. We used technology, money, and the best minds on the planet to find out where Al Qaeda was, who they were, and isolate them and destroy them. GWB must be one of the most brilliant men to take the White House. To understand this effort and push it forward. Like a lot of engineers and MBA types he's not highly verbal ala Clinton and Marketing folks, but quite brilliant in his own way. Clinton in fact killed the predecessor Able Danger. Bush made it bigger. Which guy is smarter? Is this effort legal? Not a lawyer but it doesn't look illegal to me. Note CONTENTS of phone calls due to volume were not recorded. Merely who called whom and who that person called. Probably not even linked to names and identities here in the USA but to people abroad where the controllers and money men are. Purpose to construct an Al Qaeda relationship chart. This is the new Manhattan Project; Bletchley Park, and Magic Intercepts all rolled into one. Of course Dems will kill it; and inevitably we will have a huge smoking hole where a city used to be. Then shortly thereafter it will become very clear to ordinary people: 1. Libs and Dems and the Media have no value for ordinary lives of ordinary Americans, in fact they are hostile to them. Dems do not believe (out of wishful thinking and denial of Al Qaeda's activities abroad) that 9/11 can be repeated and even admire sub-rosa the terrorist murders. See Norman Mailer. 2. Libs and Dems have sacrificed their lives for civil liberties absolutes. And have controlled the Government to the point where it has no concern with the mass murder of Americans. 3. The unarguable truth that if there are no Muslims in America they cannot carry out terror against Americans at home. I loathe and despise the Mob and fear it too; but if Dems deliberately set out to create one post super-9/11 with 1.6 million dead they could not do a better job. People WILL be safe one way or another. Limited technical solutions like Bush's brilliant plan or the mob burning down every Mosque and chasing every Muslim out of the nation. To the poster questioning why not surveil the KKK and such? I'm sure they are. However terror-hate Mosques such as the Al-Farooq Mosque in Brooklyn (1993 WTC bombing, Blind Sheik bridge-tunnel bombing plot; poison gas subway plot; Kahane Assassination etc) are as well known as advocating terrorist violence Klan rallies and currently FAR more dangerous. If they were not under constant surveillance it would be like giving Gotti a pass in the 80's cause his social club had great Canoli on the menu. |
Here, for any DU or Kos lurkers, I present, once again, your death warrant including the relevant passages from the Qur'an.
1998 fatwa
| #171 | |
Rayra 12/23/2005 11:01PM PST |
|
#139 Egfrow 12/23/2005 09:54PM PST Also looks like a deliberately staged media campaign. Only Reality hasn't stuck to the script. The NYT's opening schwerpunkt failed miserably. Today's USNWR article was supposed to increase the public outrage, all building towards the planned attempt at Impeachment of GWB. Deranged Iranian Political Analysts Courtesy of MEMRI TV, another glimpse into the world of Iranian television; a world in which “political analysts” calmly share their insights into the timely topics of Holocaust denial and Jewish blood libel.
(Click picture to play video. Requires Windows Media Player.)
|
