Skip to comments.
Saudi Man Charged for Firecrackers on U.S. Plane
Reuters ^
Posted on 01/05/2004 1:55:29 PM PST by Sub-Driver
Saudi Man Charged for Firecrackers on U.S. Plane Mon January 5, 2004 04:07 PM ET
BOSTON (Reuters) - A Saudi man was charged on Monday for carrying firecrackers in carry-on luggage on a plane from Germany, to Boston amid U.S. warnings of a possible attack bigger than the Sept. 11, 2001, hijacked plane strikes, officials said. U.S. officials in Boston said in a statement that Essam Mohammed Almohandis, 33, of Riyadh had "three small firecracker-type explosive or incendiary devices" in his carry-on luggage on a Lufthansa flight from Frankfurt on Saturday.
He told authorities at Boston's Logan International Airport that he was one a business trip and that the devices -- tubes about 1.5 inches long -- were artist crayons, U.S. attorney Michael Sullivan said.
Sullivan said Almohandis then said he did not know what they were or how they got in his backpack, which he told authorities was his only piece of luggage. He also told investigators his wife had packed his bag.
Almohandis had flown from Riyadh in Saudi Arabia to Frankfurt and then on to Boston, where the firecrackers were found in a search of his luggage.
He was arrested amid an air security clampdown that has seen the cancellation in the past week of two British Airways flights bound for Washington, D.C., one of the targets of the Sept. 11 attacks. The British airline also halted its service to Saudi Arabia last week, but resumed it earlier on Monday.
The United States raised its security alert stance to high on Dec. 21 because intelligence reports raised fears of a possible attack that could be bigger than the Sept. 11 hijacked airliner strikes on America that killed nearly 3,000 people.
Almohandis was charged with carrying explosive or incendiary devices on an airplane, which is prohibited by federal law. If convicted, he could face up to 10 years in prison for carrying the firecrackers on board a plane, up to 5 years on charges of making false statements and a fine of $250,000.
Almohandis was scheduled to appear in court on Thursday for a hearing during which a federal judge will determine if there is probable cause to further pursue the case and if Almohandis is to remain in federal custody.
TOPICS: Germany; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; airsecurity; almohandis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: U S Army EOD
See post 17. (Sounds from the article like they're talking about something like M-80's)
--Boot
To: Stallone
oh yeah...
</michael moore, leftist morons, media, Hollywood, EuroNazis, Chomsky, Dems>
22
posted on
01/05/2004 2:49:24 PM PST
by
Stallone
(Warrior Freepers Rule The Earth)
To: TruthNtegrity
re: your post 307 on the SHE BOMBER thread... ping!
23
posted on
01/05/2004 2:51:35 PM PST
by
glock rocks
(Support Free Republic)
To: Sub-Driver
But did he have burnt siena in his luggage??
24
posted on
01/05/2004 2:51:37 PM PST
by
tracer
To: Sub-Driver
A Saudi man was charged on Monday for carrying firecrackers in carry-on luggage on a plane from Germany, You mean security failed ? Good heavens what is next ??
25
posted on
01/05/2004 2:52:18 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(Resolve to perform what you must; perform without fail that what you resolve.)
To: Sub-Driver
26
posted on
01/05/2004 2:52:42 PM PST
by
BunnySlippers
(Help Bring Colly-fornia Back ...)
To: NonValueAdded
Here's a wager for you:
They'll further analyze the "crayons," which appeared to be made of a wax-like material -- as crayons are -- and discover that they in fact were made of a plastique-type explosive.
You heard it first here, along with a repeat of my prediction that Lieberman will be a Republican within three months.......
27
posted on
01/05/2004 2:57:59 PM PST
by
tracer
To: NonValueAdded
See my #27 above.....
28
posted on
01/05/2004 3:02:35 PM PST
by
tracer
To: NonValueAdded
No fire cracker wouldn't set off C4, please don't get the she bomber started again, I'm already in enough trouble.
29
posted on
01/05/2004 3:10:00 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
To: Boot Hill
Smaller than M80's probably just some harmless lady fingers left over from New Years. I doubt if there is really anything to this.
30
posted on
01/05/2004 3:12:40 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
To: Sub-Driver
He should NEVER be allowed on another plane!! Obvious he was up to no good.
To: tracer
Now why would Little Joe go and do that?
32
posted on
01/05/2004 3:18:05 PM PST
by
NonValueAdded
("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
To: TaxPayer2000
It would have done more for aircraft safty to shoot the man instead of asking him why and what and whatever, No, no, no
Drug him, interrogate him, and exploit the INTEL. We can always execute him after he is no further use, depending on how the facts develop.
To: U S Army EOD
Well, since the comments I saw were aimed at your ex, I can't imagine what kind of trouble you are in.
And you helped me with some guys on an Intel board who usually don't pay any attention to what I say. Between quoting you and verification of effect by a friend on there, I finally gained credibility. Thanks!
FReepmail me the answer if you don't want to post it on here for all to see!
Truthy
34
posted on
01/05/2004 3:38:20 PM PST
by
TruthNtegrity
(I refuse to call candidates for President "Democratic" as they are NOT. They are Democrats.)
To: Sub-Driver
"three small firecracker-type explosive or incendiary devicesHopefully,Someone is checking inside these to make sure they are what they look like.
A crayon sized piece of modern explosives can still do some pretty good damage to an aircraft in flight.
35
posted on
01/05/2004 3:43:53 PM PST
by
HP8753
(Some companies should be happy with four sigma)
To: Sub-Driver
I'd imagine that even a small incendiary device stowed inside luggage could produce a raging fire in the cargo bay. A bundle of greasy rags wrapped around the device could start an unstoppable fire inside the aircraft at altitude.
Do modern passenger jets even have Halon extinguishers in the cargo compartment?
Our Aerospace Freepers may be able to answer this question.
36
posted on
01/05/2004 3:43:54 PM PST
by
The KG9 Kid
(Semper Fi)
To: Sub-Driver
Blasting Cap and fuse
To: DainBramage; cardinal4
Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't "mohandis" in Arabic mean "engineer?"
38
posted on
01/05/2004 4:21:35 PM PST
by
Ax
To: U S Army EOD
Are they certain that it was a firecracker and not a blasting cap made to look like a firecracker?
39
posted on
01/05/2004 4:24:58 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(Nine out of the ten voices in my head told me to stay home and clean my guns today)
To: SauronOfMordor
I would be willing to bet it was some left over fireworks from New Years.
40
posted on
01/05/2004 4:28:32 PM PST
by
U S Army EOD
(When the EOD technician screws up, he is always the first to notice.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson