To: thesummerwind
I would think they would have timed the crash for someplece besides the RED SEA for maximun damage
9 posted on
01/05/2004 12:51:28 PM PST by
uncbob
To: uncbob
I would think they would have timed the crash for someplece besides the RED SEA for maximun damagepoor planning or expediency........what do you expect of ragheads?
12 posted on
01/05/2004 12:55:52 PM PST by
thesummerwind
(Images of broken light which dance before me like a million eyes)
To: uncbob
I would think they would have timed the crash for someplece besides the RED SEA for maximun damage I think that 140 plus body parts floating around at sea is maximum enough for me. And then you realize we are not dealing with rational people here.
We can't wear our scarves, okay then we will blow you out of the skys.
15 posted on
01/05/2004 1:04:04 PM PST by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: uncbob
>I would think they would have timed the crash for someplece besides the RED SEA for maximun damage
Britain's Tony Blair
and his family were there,
on a holiday,
in Egypt. I bet
this plane took off, did something
seen as threatening,
and was shot right down.
Rather than spark French/British
tensions in public,
this is being played
as a technical glitch, not
an "intervention."
To: uncbob
It is possible that the passengers fought to stop the plane from being taken over and it was crashed, ala United 93. All French are not cowards. The cockpit voice recorder is going to be key here.
To: uncbob
I would think they would have timed the crash for someplece besides the RED SEA for maximun damage
Just a thought here, maybe they wanted to avoid Arab/Muslim casualties. Take it down over the Red Sea and only the passengers die.
47 posted on
01/05/2004 4:21:29 PM PST by
BJClinton
(If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would be in power today, not in prison)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson