Skip to comments.
For Afghans, words must silence guns (Femenism and Gun Control to Save Afghanistan?)
Boston Globe ^
| 1/5/2004
| Sima Wali
Posted on 01/05/2004 5:54:15 AM PST by Lance Romance
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:11:19 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
THE DEBATE raging between extremist Islamists and moderate Afghans over a new constitution for Afghanistan misses a vital link -- the connection between America's heightened national security concerns and Afghan women's struggle.
During the past two decades, extremists hijacked Afghanistan's maturing democracy movement through the power of the gun. Now the extremists are doing it again -- justifying their actions with claims of Islam and culture. Yet, the argument against women's rights or democracy is neither Afghan nor Islamic.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: afghanconstitution; afghanistan; southasia
Apparently, she want to dictate who and who cannot participate in the Constitutional process. How Un-Constitutional.
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
41 |
Delaware |
50.00
|
1
|
50.00
|
23
|
2.17
|
|
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
2
posted on
01/05/2004 5:55:59 AM PST
by
Support Free Republic
(Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
To: Lance Romance
It id, however, the discussion of these matters, particularly the dysfunctionality of the kind of strict, supposedly Islamic code that gives women no right to ever move out of the house, that is important. As Attaturk pointed out years ago, one of the stupidest aspects of this kind of supposedly strict, return to the 600's Islam, is that it throws away half of a people's human resources.
3
posted on
01/05/2004 6:00:08 AM PST
by
AmericanVictory
(Should we be more like them, or they like us?)
To: Lance Romance
It is no surprise that Afghan women are again leading the movement to establish an open and tolerant Muslim society About as big an oxymoron as you can get...
4
posted on
01/05/2004 6:03:12 AM PST
by
2banana
To: Lance Romance
Now that there is a chance for reconstruction, the United States must deliver on its promises.So according to this peace activist, the only use of the USA should be to support and supply Afghanistan reconstruction. Who pays for this? Who keeps it up? I tell ya, some of these "peace activists" are really ignorant.
5
posted on
01/05/2004 6:12:25 AM PST
by
Ken522
To: Lance Romance
Apparently she is well aware that if some of these chauvinistic thugs are allowed to hold power, they will continue to brutally oppress her sex.
Sounds like a smart woman to me.
To: 2banana
tolerant Muslim society Bwhahahaha... is that like a 6 sided circle?
To: StatesEnemy
looks like an uphill battle to me.
To: StatesEnemy
From Another Article:
Under the new constitution, Afghanistan is an "Islamic republic" whose president will rule alongside a national assembly. The document goes to some lengths to spell out the rights of minority groups and of women -- giving women equal rights as citizens before the law and awarding them about one-fifth of the seats in the lower house of congress.
So, what's this crank complaining about?
To: Lance Romance
awarding them about one-fifth of the seats in the lower house of congress. Wow, that's mighty white of 'em.
To: StatesEnemy
Hate to say this but women will only have power where men allow them to have power. Islamist men are thugs. American men are chumps.
11
posted on
01/05/2004 7:02:21 AM PST
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of AMERICAN anger.)
To: StatesEnemy
Hate to say this but women will only have power where men allow them to have power. Islamist men are thugs. American men are chumps.
12
posted on
01/05/2004 7:02:27 AM PST
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of AMERICAN anger.)
To: johnb838
The only reason why American Men are chumps is because they insist on impregnating women without first making sure they're not money grubbing shrews.
To: StatesEnemy
Good point. Still, the only ones they have to blame for being emasculated is themselves.
14
posted on
01/05/2004 7:32:30 AM PST
by
johnb838
(Understand the root causes of AMERICAN anger.)
To: Lance Romance
"Throughout the 23 years of war that began with the Afghans siding with the United States to defeat communism, champions for Afghan democracy remained confident that following their period of darkness, America would stand strong in helping to establish democratic institutions. But the defeat of the Soviet Union brought only abandonment. Now with America again wavering, the time has come to decide what exactly it is trying to accomplish in Afghanistan."
Classic left wing political wedge propaganda says that the gender gap in the U.S.A. electorate can be exploited anytime the West tries to improve the conditions of Muslims anywhere. Notice how the author's history starts only 23 years ago, coincidently when America had strategic reasons to be in Afghanistan. But a die-hard feminist - who married an Afghani and lived in Afghanistan named Phyllis Chesler, says that Afghan culture has treated woman as second class citizens for centuries.
15
posted on
01/05/2004 8:03:30 AM PST
by
reed_inthe_wind
(That Hillary really knows how to internationalize my MOJO.)
To: StatesEnemy
Amen to that brother!
16
posted on
01/05/2004 9:30:31 AM PST
by
Cardini
To: StatesEnemy
Reminds me of the adage that the reason most women hate prostitutes is because the prostitute only wants an hourly rate, all the rest are out for 50% of the gross!
17
posted on
01/05/2004 9:32:44 AM PST
by
Cardini
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson