You're welcome.
I'm fully willing to accept any conclusion in the final analysis so long as it's based on *all* the evidence (not just a 'conspiratorial excerpt' that supports some pet theory) utilizing the latest scientific processing/processes for (for evidence processing) and sound analysis of that evidence by a competent, assembled board of seasoned aeronautical experts.
Yeh, like the crowd they got together to deal with Flight 800? Really, let's get Kallstrom and those guys.